After the mRNA onslaught, rates of senior citizen arrythemia , myocarditis and blood pressure issues rose exponentially. Did they not? Why not implement a mass populace statin and heart medication campaign ? Gosh. How convenient.
I highly recommend people take a look at the following article then survey all ''outspoken COVID critics'' to see who has covered the main issue raised (care homes) with any sense of urgency and consistency the past 18 months THEN you can decide who is REALLY fighting for THE truth. Personally, i don't see anyone. I only see distractions from discussing and therefore highlighting what matters most.
- there are viruses but no fiddling with viruses could make them dangerous
- and anyways McCullough is controlled opo
I dunno man. The last bullet if you feel it true is just insane, like literally. Its like where no one ever can match your exact version of truth, and are therefore opposition? McCullough did HUGE things to public opinion, put his career and reputation on the line, spoke against the jabs from the beginning, before they were even rolled out. His impact was to I dunno convince 40 million americans to never take another mRNA jab? Something like.
Dont be so sure the boys behind the scenes might not be able to engineer an actually lethal something or other, it bears watching. Pay attention, it starts crossing from one mammal to another thats a bad sign.
“GoF” is a BS story intended to fool us to carry on funneling billions into pandemic preparedness. Like “climate science”.
Whether “viruses exist” is a facile question. The more interesting and useful question is “how robust is the generally accepted model of viral contagion?”
Not very IMO.
You’d know all of the above if you’d perused what I’ve written so far.
This is a reply I made to a friend on similar subject, so w/o re-writing I am using it again: ‘Yes Fauci is a liar and has a long history as a con-artist, getting government monies/funding to keep playing in his labs… unfortunately the GOF/BSL3 and 4 level labs simply do the testing with animal tissues to make their serums/vaccines for big pharma. They are all in bed with each other lining their pockets at the expense of the people in more ways than just money, as in keeping us a guinea pigs within the cartel$ of big pharma/big medicine/big gov’t/big ag, sick & diseased, less quality of life/shortened life…. THE WHOLE DEAL with a virus being leaked from a lab is simply ‘controlled opposition as this is not possible other than via injections which is what they work on, blood transfusions possibly, and we make our own viruses to rid ourselves of our own disease state/level of toxicity… the ‘covid’ was a psyop, using one of the common cold coronaviruses we humans have!knowing most are not aware of that! Instill fear and you can get lots of indoctrinated people to do anything! Like mask up, vaccinate, take meds, etc… 😩’
I disagree there could never be a pandemic, you could seed something lethal in a 100 places at once and it would qualify probably
Im sorry I was rude. My basic point is McCullough whether he agrees with you on even some basic points, is STILL a powerful ally who put a lot on the line, and (wild guess) convinced 40 million americans to never take another mRNA jab. He's a good guy.
If you seed something in 100s of places and it causes harm within those locales that’s mass poisoning, not a pandemic, or certainly not a pandemic within the context of what was sold to us, and what they are using to justify an entire “pandemic preparedness” industry.
To be clear, the essence of their claim is person to person spread from a point source, not simultaneous mass poisoning.
Let me ask you: do you think that we (ie humanity) need to be taking steps to prepare for the next pandemic, and what steps do you think those should be?
I told you already I dont believe there was a pandemic in 2020. It would certainly appear to be one you seed multiple places something lethal. I agree the rest is political.
Yes he is an aggressive self promoting man. After he was stripped of 2 editorships, banned from practising somewhere, I forget the details, lambasted as a conspiracy theory maniac, he stuck it out and has recouped some of that.
Like to Jonathan I apologize for my rude tone. But my basic question stands, while you disagree about much would you THEREFORE say he is controlled oppo, an antagonist? Does convincing God knows how many millions to stop or never take an mRNA jab count for anything? Divide and conquer, the globalists approve?
You and Jonathan both pushed on my comment, thats fine. But neither answered my principle point, does an ally have to agree on all your held truths to be an ally? Or flip it, if they dont agree on stuff are they enemies? If McCullough is subject to such strong criticism what do you think of Malone? Another guy who attracts enemies from his side and yet like McCullough has countless millions off the juice forever.
Both of them stick to some variation of truthiness that lets them get on MSM. They got to speak by not pushing the envelope too far, perhaps that has been and is a sound strategy. Who on this planet has saved more folk from the dangerous juice? Yeadon had the credentials and the stature to do the same but he spent it by pushing the envelope too far. He got sidelined immediately and still is to a large extent. He was right and irrelevant at the same time. Who helped us more? Yeadon was definitely right about more and McCullough did more good.
I think the phrase controlled opposition is simplistic. Most of the people who are pushing the ideas which bolster the need for a pandemic preparedness industry are doing so honestly, without some sort of ulterior agenda.
Most of them don’t understand enough to see how harmful their assertions are.
Most people want a simple story, with a few scapegoats, and it’s quite attractive to be able to blame a few individuals for “creating the virus that killed millions”.
I have, however, seen enough of McCullough’s output to believe that this is not the case with him.
That is not to say that what he does, he does so entirely willingly.
Your two last sentences, well there we are? You hint at co-option.... I feel you are dodging, has McCulloughs influence considered in total, been beneficial or harmful to humanity? I say clearly beneficial, obviously so. I disagree with a lot he says, that doesn't change the above.
Do you think McCullough has done more good than harm? Is he an ally?
EDIT I press the point because the 'feel' of your posting is McCullough is a bad man as must be pushed back on. You dont say for eg "while P McCullough has clearly pushed back on the jab agenda and the jabs themselves, to great and lasting effect, I disagree his views on ..... XYZ". It doesn't 'feel' you are arguing with an ally, it 'feels' you are suggesting co-opted evil at play. To be histrionic. Why I argue.
EDIT2 sry man gotta say - just looked the McCullough website and they are celebrating the HHS pronouncement jabs for chickens would be a bad thing. And the McCullough website was early and often saying we need to stop the useless slaughter I dunno 150 million chickens. YES, they use the language of blah blah blah you dont agree with, sure. But Kennedy would fail your test? And here we are, and regardless the framing, perhaps we stop killing chickens and promoting chicken jabs.... that would be GOOD right?
Wow man. OK. I said my piece, I appreciate I have the forum to do so. I also count you an ally, despite all of the above. You feel McCullough is helping set us up for pandemic 2.0? Perhaps thats not fair, that you think that.... it feels that though. You also are refusing to discuss his net benefit, its go forward only. Don't you feel past behaviour is relevant? How many millions do you have to save before you are not a bad guy? 50 million? Is it a billion? Nope go forward, I dont want to discuss the past?
Note the chickens haha. Go well friend. Find YOUR friends. Its a broad brush, we aren't going to agree.
If not occupied personal this or that, I will come back and grovel I see McCullough et al promoting anything like pandemic 2.0? Not that my or your view matters much in the big scheme. I just find fracturing within the resistance is a thing. Perhaps YOU are the controlled opo, hahahaha. That would be ironic.
No need to apologize. Your tone is fine and I don't tone police in general.
My previous points stand. Yes, on the US side, I believe McCullough and a few others were very much used from the beginning, with or without their full knowledge at the time, elevated and rewarded - with the aspects you mentioned being intentional.
I don't say "Controlled Op." I've said Approved Voices and (more recently, with Jonathan) Permitted/Promoted Dissent, which helps take the focus off of specific individuals or organizations/groups and onto the positions held. (Part 1 here https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/false-binaries-that-limit-the-spectrum ; Part 2 to follow and will address Early Treatment as Permitted Dissent)
I come from an academic background, where competition between views and groups/teams of people is the norm, with alliances around specific topics or questions, depending on purpose (e.g., writing an article, doing a presentation). From that POV, I can't be an ally of someone I don't know, but the person and I could have views that are congruent.
Part of our point about "False Binaries" (whether intentionally planted or emerged) is illustrated by your comments. Letting the public act as though there are only two categories (Pro/Anti Govt Narrative) mostly serves to keep people away from views that question whether something was suddenly spreading at all.
I am pretty sure I am starting to waste bandwidth here. I find what you say above comforting and compelling.
What I disagree with is this fracturing of the resistance, infighting not debating? Jonathan just told me pretty directly McCullough is to be fought, because he feels McCullough is supporting a nefarious agenda. I'm kinda guessing here.... OK, could be. It takes McCullough, whom I respect as someone who has managed to 'out' the whole mRNA thing as few others have, who has gotten (broken record) say 50 million people to resist and never take another mRNA jab, and frames him as 'bad'.
I agree you argue truth with peers. I dont agree you frame them as bad you dont agree. You dont mind my 'tone', OK, but 'tone' still counts?
Proof and pudding? McCullough website currently celebrating pushback on jabs for chickens, and the ridiculous, inhumane, 150 million chicken cull.
If McCullough supports pandemic 2.0 I WILL change my mind. Its the tone, "McCullough bad", it drives me nuts. Hardly a person on the planet as has done more. I agree he is nuts to assume there was ever a pandemic... However he talks disease X constantly, with a view to defusing the fear. He uses language as would be acceptable MSM, where certain things are not true are assumed as true... Are we reading different articles?
Our job, if there is one, is to wake up the max number of normies. You gotta speak a language they can accept, you start talking there was no pandemic you start losing bandwidth, reach? McCullough uses normie language, you guys haggle with McCullough, but DONT say he is evil. That is nuts. Tone counts. Yeadon is perhaps more right than McCullough, but McCullough influenced more normies, did more good?
I'm a fast typer. And absurdly repeating myself. Godspeed. Someone's gotta say the pandemic was a plandemic, for sure.
"For the pundits, we are calling this crisis before it happens and have been giving practical recommendations so people around the world can protect themselves, particularly farm workers. That’s not “fear-porn” that’s responsible pandemic preparedness."
So your position is mRNA could never provide benefit even decades down the road? Are you saying that McCullough says current mRNA offerings are safe and should be used?
You got an agenda man. I personally think that at some point down the road, mRNA may have some uses. Isn't that what he said? I looked the link.
I dunno about statins, you got J Battacharya saying I dunno too. I guess just no one agrees all your points, its all corruption and co-opted folk and what? Your view is complete, clear, correct.
Bad dissenters! Its a bad feel. I see now you've been against McCullough as 'not enlightened enough' for quite a while now, I was not aware. I'll leave you to it. We are not going to have any meeting of the minds. You couldn't be a good and Godly enough person to meet requirements, hereabouts.
OK you're suggesting I'm not a live human being, free on the earth, rather a troll. Fine. You won't hear from me again, that might be more comfortable for you? Cause McCullough bad, objective evidence to the contrary re millions will never take another mRNA anything thanks to him.
"Paranoia strikes deep. Into your life it will creep." You prob know the song, and yes Buffalo springfield was likely coopted. They accidentally wrote some great words.
Your point is worth consideration. The dangers of "naming things" in this bizarre moment in history is that by all accounts from the rational minority , "names" are being leveraged for sociopolitical means, and agenda operations. "Virus" has since it's origin refered to poison. I'm talking from the Latin. If that's the case indeed , "gain of function" is no joke .
Are you saying that making sure gain of function research is happening is the whole point because it is insane and scares the shit out of us, and their intent is primarily to have us believe that a crazy lab created pathogen is on the loose, rather than to have us actually threatened by a sicko lab created pathogen?
Is it that every part of a pandemic preparedness infrastructure is founded on bullshit and the true underlying purpose is to enslave us?
I have a hard time swallowing that many terrible illnesses aren't contagious and aren't able to be made more contagious and more deadly.
GoF has always been directed at vaccine development and is standard process in virology. There are many reasons to defund GoF, but its ability to create super scary pathogens that "leak" or are released into thin air and circumnavigate the globe isn't one of them. https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/sunetra-guptas-view-on-the-origins
If it was “GOF’ed” they did a pretty crappy job didn’t they? Lamest bioweapon ever. It’s like Monty Python’s Spanish Inquisition with the comfy pillows. Then ask yourself, which is easier to do if your intent is to exert massive control over much of the globe: A:engineer a virus that even tho it is untested in the wild (because it can’t be) is somehow able to traverse the globe killing many (yet at the same time not be concerned that it will attack its creators and promoters) or B: Just create a scary story and control the narrative and hence the public through massive propganda and various Psyops. Since we know the activities for B were occurring…
Of course they're not fighting for the TRUTH because the majority of them are part of that same false paradigm of medicine that they claim they are opposing; the false paradigm of allopathic medicine which has been sustained and imbedded into everyone's consciousness for at least 150 years; extremely difficult to accept the fact that your reputation and profession have been built on lies, deception and fake science and that you have been actively complicit (in one way or another) in promoting the ultimate lie of doing no harm.
McCullough was also pushing statins as good to prevent dementia by linking a bullshit study 😂.
But then, cardiologists that push pills are just bringing repeat customers.
(Statins at the top of the post)
https://robc137.substack.com/p/mccullough-pushing-bird-flu-paranoia
After the mRNA onslaught, rates of senior citizen arrythemia , myocarditis and blood pressure issues rose exponentially. Did they not? Why not implement a mass populace statin and heart medication campaign ? Gosh. How convenient.
Not surprised by Dr. McCullough's continued gas lighting and lies.
Early treatment protocol for a confirmed psyop.
Thank you for shedding more light on these grifters.
Truth, Love, Justice and Freedom.
Dr. Mike Yeadon exposing the Covid crime below.
contagionhoax.com
I highly recommend people take a look at the following article then survey all ''outspoken COVID critics'' to see who has covered the main issue raised (care homes) with any sense of urgency and consistency the past 18 months THEN you can decide who is REALLY fighting for THE truth. Personally, i don't see anyone. I only see distractions from discussing and therefore highlighting what matters most.
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newpandemic-limited-focus-of-debate
Gain of function = better functioning injectable nano technology. S protein is bs.
I do not understand. Is your position that
- there are no viruses
- there are viruses but no fiddling with viruses could make them dangerous
- and anyways McCullough is controlled opo
I dunno man. The last bullet if you feel it true is just insane, like literally. Its like where no one ever can match your exact version of truth, and are therefore opposition? McCullough did HUGE things to public opinion, put his career and reputation on the line, spoke against the jabs from the beginning, before they were even rolled out. His impact was to I dunno convince 40 million americans to never take another mRNA jab? Something like.
Dont be so sure the boys behind the scenes might not be able to engineer an actually lethal something or other, it bears watching. Pay attention, it starts crossing from one mammal to another thats a bad sign.
My position is:
There was no pandemic.
Pandemics are sociopolitical events.
“GoF” is a BS story intended to fool us to carry on funneling billions into pandemic preparedness. Like “climate science”.
Whether “viruses exist” is a facile question. The more interesting and useful question is “how robust is the generally accepted model of viral contagion?”
Not very IMO.
You’d know all of the above if you’d perused what I’ve written so far.
This is a reply I made to a friend on similar subject, so w/o re-writing I am using it again: ‘Yes Fauci is a liar and has a long history as a con-artist, getting government monies/funding to keep playing in his labs… unfortunately the GOF/BSL3 and 4 level labs simply do the testing with animal tissues to make their serums/vaccines for big pharma. They are all in bed with each other lining their pockets at the expense of the people in more ways than just money, as in keeping us a guinea pigs within the cartel$ of big pharma/big medicine/big gov’t/big ag, sick & diseased, less quality of life/shortened life…. THE WHOLE DEAL with a virus being leaked from a lab is simply ‘controlled opposition as this is not possible other than via injections which is what they work on, blood transfusions possibly, and we make our own viruses to rid ourselves of our own disease state/level of toxicity… the ‘covid’ was a psyop, using one of the common cold coronaviruses we humans have!knowing most are not aware of that! Instill fear and you can get lots of indoctrinated people to do anything! Like mask up, vaccinate, take meds, etc… 😩’
I agree on the pandemic
I disagree there could never be a pandemic, you could seed something lethal in a 100 places at once and it would qualify probably
Im sorry I was rude. My basic point is McCullough whether he agrees with you on even some basic points, is STILL a powerful ally who put a lot on the line, and (wild guess) convinced 40 million americans to never take another mRNA jab. He's a good guy.
Is that your view?
If you seed something in 100s of places and it causes harm within those locales that’s mass poisoning, not a pandemic, or certainly not a pandemic within the context of what was sold to us, and what they are using to justify an entire “pandemic preparedness” industry.
To be clear, the essence of their claim is person to person spread from a point source, not simultaneous mass poisoning.
Let me ask you: do you think that we (ie humanity) need to be taking steps to prepare for the next pandemic, and what steps do you think those should be?
I told you already I dont believe there was a pandemic in 2020. It would certainly appear to be one you seed multiple places something lethal. I agree the rest is political.
"McCullough did HUGE things to public opinion"
Yes, like support the govt's story about a novel spreading virus from China. The rest of the Early Treatment regime did the same thing
https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/what-do-i-think-about-ivermectin
"put his career and reputation on the line"
When? How? On the contrary, PMC became a household name and did very well, thank you very much. Got coverage in the WSJ, no less. All press is good press. https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/peter-mccullough-is-a-pandemicist
Yes he is an aggressive self promoting man. After he was stripped of 2 editorships, banned from practising somewhere, I forget the details, lambasted as a conspiracy theory maniac, he stuck it out and has recouped some of that.
Like to Jonathan I apologize for my rude tone. But my basic question stands, while you disagree about much would you THEREFORE say he is controlled oppo, an antagonist? Does convincing God knows how many millions to stop or never take an mRNA jab count for anything? Divide and conquer, the globalists approve?
You and Jonathan both pushed on my comment, thats fine. But neither answered my principle point, does an ally have to agree on all your held truths to be an ally? Or flip it, if they dont agree on stuff are they enemies? If McCullough is subject to such strong criticism what do you think of Malone? Another guy who attracts enemies from his side and yet like McCullough has countless millions off the juice forever.
Both of them stick to some variation of truthiness that lets them get on MSM. They got to speak by not pushing the envelope too far, perhaps that has been and is a sound strategy. Who on this planet has saved more folk from the dangerous juice? Yeadon had the credentials and the stature to do the same but he spent it by pushing the envelope too far. He got sidelined immediately and still is to a large extent. He was right and irrelevant at the same time. Who helped us more? Yeadon was definitely right about more and McCullough did more good.
I think the phrase controlled opposition is simplistic. Most of the people who are pushing the ideas which bolster the need for a pandemic preparedness industry are doing so honestly, without some sort of ulterior agenda.
Most of them don’t understand enough to see how harmful their assertions are.
Most people want a simple story, with a few scapegoats, and it’s quite attractive to be able to blame a few individuals for “creating the virus that killed millions”.
I have, however, seen enough of McCullough’s output to believe that this is not the case with him.
That is not to say that what he does, he does so entirely willingly.
My feeling is that McCullough was sincere at the beginning.
Your two last sentences, well there we are? You hint at co-option.... I feel you are dodging, has McCulloughs influence considered in total, been beneficial or harmful to humanity? I say clearly beneficial, obviously so. I disagree with a lot he says, that doesn't change the above.
Do you think McCullough has done more good than harm? Is he an ally?
EDIT I press the point because the 'feel' of your posting is McCullough is a bad man as must be pushed back on. You dont say for eg "while P McCullough has clearly pushed back on the jab agenda and the jabs themselves, to great and lasting effect, I disagree his views on ..... XYZ". It doesn't 'feel' you are arguing with an ally, it 'feels' you are suggesting co-opted evil at play. To be histrionic. Why I argue.
EDIT2 sry man gotta say - just looked the McCullough website and they are celebrating the HHS pronouncement jabs for chickens would be a bad thing. And the McCullough website was early and often saying we need to stop the useless slaughter I dunno 150 million chickens. YES, they use the language of blah blah blah you dont agree with, sure. But Kennedy would fail your test? And here we are, and regardless the framing, perhaps we stop killing chickens and promoting chicken jabs.... that would be GOOD right?
I’m not just looking at what has happened but what is likely to happen if certain scenarios play out.
Much of what he says now (on the GoF topic) appears to make it easier for those who just faked one pandemic to do it again.
I have no idea what his motive for doing this is.
Wow man. OK. I said my piece, I appreciate I have the forum to do so. I also count you an ally, despite all of the above. You feel McCullough is helping set us up for pandemic 2.0? Perhaps thats not fair, that you think that.... it feels that though. You also are refusing to discuss his net benefit, its go forward only. Don't you feel past behaviour is relevant? How many millions do you have to save before you are not a bad guy? 50 million? Is it a billion? Nope go forward, I dont want to discuss the past?
Note the chickens haha. Go well friend. Find YOUR friends. Its a broad brush, we aren't going to agree.
If not occupied personal this or that, I will come back and grovel I see McCullough et al promoting anything like pandemic 2.0? Not that my or your view matters much in the big scheme. I just find fracturing within the resistance is a thing. Perhaps YOU are the controlled opo, hahahaha. That would be ironic.
No need to apologize. Your tone is fine and I don't tone police in general.
My previous points stand. Yes, on the US side, I believe McCullough and a few others were very much used from the beginning, with or without their full knowledge at the time, elevated and rewarded - with the aspects you mentioned being intentional.
I don't say "Controlled Op." I've said Approved Voices and (more recently, with Jonathan) Permitted/Promoted Dissent, which helps take the focus off of specific individuals or organizations/groups and onto the positions held. (Part 1 here https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/false-binaries-that-limit-the-spectrum ; Part 2 to follow and will address Early Treatment as Permitted Dissent)
I come from an academic background, where competition between views and groups/teams of people is the norm, with alliances around specific topics or questions, depending on purpose (e.g., writing an article, doing a presentation). From that POV, I can't be an ally of someone I don't know, but the person and I could have views that are congruent.
Part of our point about "False Binaries" (whether intentionally planted or emerged) is illustrated by your comments. Letting the public act as though there are only two categories (Pro/Anti Govt Narrative) mostly serves to keep people away from views that question whether something was suddenly spreading at all.
I am pretty sure I am starting to waste bandwidth here. I find what you say above comforting and compelling.
What I disagree with is this fracturing of the resistance, infighting not debating? Jonathan just told me pretty directly McCullough is to be fought, because he feels McCullough is supporting a nefarious agenda. I'm kinda guessing here.... OK, could be. It takes McCullough, whom I respect as someone who has managed to 'out' the whole mRNA thing as few others have, who has gotten (broken record) say 50 million people to resist and never take another mRNA jab, and frames him as 'bad'.
I agree you argue truth with peers. I dont agree you frame them as bad you dont agree. You dont mind my 'tone', OK, but 'tone' still counts?
Proof and pudding? McCullough website currently celebrating pushback on jabs for chickens, and the ridiculous, inhumane, 150 million chicken cull.
If McCullough supports pandemic 2.0 I WILL change my mind. Its the tone, "McCullough bad", it drives me nuts. Hardly a person on the planet as has done more. I agree he is nuts to assume there was ever a pandemic... However he talks disease X constantly, with a view to defusing the fear. He uses language as would be acceptable MSM, where certain things are not true are assumed as true... Are we reading different articles?
Our job, if there is one, is to wake up the max number of normies. You gotta speak a language they can accept, you start talking there was no pandemic you start losing bandwidth, reach? McCullough uses normie language, you guys haggle with McCullough, but DONT say he is evil. That is nuts. Tone counts. Yeadon is perhaps more right than McCullough, but McCullough influenced more normies, did more good?
I'm a fast typer. And absurdly repeating myself. Godspeed. Someone's gotta say the pandemic was a plandemic, for sure.
Well here he is proposing that mRNA COULD be made safe, which is to disregard the quite obvious structural design issues:
https://sanityunleashed.substack.com/p/could-transfecting-mrna-products
Here he is saying (in respect of "bird flu" that:
"For the pundits, we are calling this crisis before it happens and have been giving practical recommendations so people around the world can protect themselves, particularly farm workers. That’s not “fear-porn” that’s responsible pandemic preparedness."
https://sanityunleashed.substack.com/p/mccullough-is-a-next-pandemicist
And he says:
"One has to wonder why anyone would downplay strong messaging coming from Dr. Jeremy Farrar, Chief Scientist at the World Health Organization.”
Here he is discouraging people stopping statins:
https://sanityunleashed.substack.com/p/peter-mccullough-now-propping-up
So your position is mRNA could never provide benefit even decades down the road? Are you saying that McCullough says current mRNA offerings are safe and should be used?
You got an agenda man. I personally think that at some point down the road, mRNA may have some uses. Isn't that what he said? I looked the link.
I dunno about statins, you got J Battacharya saying I dunno too. I guess just no one agrees all your points, its all corruption and co-opted folk and what? Your view is complete, clear, correct.
Bad dissenters! Its a bad feel. I see now you've been against McCullough as 'not enlightened enough' for quite a while now, I was not aware. I'll leave you to it. We are not going to have any meeting of the minds. You couldn't be a good and Godly enough person to meet requirements, hereabouts.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning
OK you're suggesting I'm not a live human being, free on the earth, rather a troll. Fine. You won't hear from me again, that might be more comfortable for you? Cause McCullough bad, objective evidence to the contrary re millions will never take another mRNA anything thanks to him.
"Paranoia strikes deep. Into your life it will creep." You prob know the song, and yes Buffalo springfield was likely coopted. They accidentally wrote some great words.
Your point is worth consideration. The dangers of "naming things" in this bizarre moment in history is that by all accounts from the rational minority , "names" are being leveraged for sociopolitical means, and agenda operations. "Virus" has since it's origin refered to poison. I'm talking from the Latin. If that's the case indeed , "gain of function" is no joke .
Naming is indeed everything.
https://sanityunleashed.substack.com/p/sars-cov-2-whats-in-a-name-everything
Kaboom
Not sure what you're getting at here.
Do you support gain of function virus research?
No, it is wasteful. But that doesn’t mean it’s not being weaponized to enslave us.
Do you support “pandemic preparedness”?
Still not sure what you're message is.
Are you saying that making sure gain of function research is happening is the whole point because it is insane and scares the shit out of us, and their intent is primarily to have us believe that a crazy lab created pathogen is on the loose, rather than to have us actually threatened by a sicko lab created pathogen?
Is it that every part of a pandemic preparedness infrastructure is founded on bullshit and the true underlying purpose is to enslave us?
I have a hard time swallowing that many terrible illnesses aren't contagious and aren't able to be made more contagious and more deadly.
GoF has always been directed at vaccine development and is standard process in virology. There are many reasons to defund GoF, but its ability to create super scary pathogens that "leak" or are released into thin air and circumnavigate the globe isn't one of them. https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/sunetra-guptas-view-on-the-origins
If it was “GOF’ed” they did a pretty crappy job didn’t they? Lamest bioweapon ever. It’s like Monty Python’s Spanish Inquisition with the comfy pillows. Then ask yourself, which is easier to do if your intent is to exert massive control over much of the globe: A:engineer a virus that even tho it is untested in the wild (because it can’t be) is somehow able to traverse the globe killing many (yet at the same time not be concerned that it will attack its creators and promoters) or B: Just create a scary story and control the narrative and hence the public through massive propganda and various Psyops. Since we know the activities for B were occurring…
Of course they're not fighting for the TRUTH because the majority of them are part of that same false paradigm of medicine that they claim they are opposing; the false paradigm of allopathic medicine which has been sustained and imbedded into everyone's consciousness for at least 150 years; extremely difficult to accept the fact that your reputation and profession have been built on lies, deception and fake science and that you have been actively complicit (in one way or another) in promoting the ultimate lie of doing no harm.