I remember being bemused by the flippant reference by Boris Johnson as to who knows what is happening in Italy. This was his reasoning for us to start doing the bizarre covid rules. I read these articles and thank you for reassuring me that I wasn't wrong to question what was happening, it didn't make sense. One of my sons was quite upset by my reluctance to believe. He has never since acknowledged that it may not have been as he thought.
Yes, none of it made sense. It was a competence test, gradually increasing in insanity to see just how far people would go before realising they had been well and truly 'had'. From my WordPress site.
I have also written an article about Italy and Bergamo. I can agree with you that it can't just be a virus from an epidemiological point of view. This would have to have been isolated first anyway.
In my opinion, the causes of the deaths lie in the too early intubations / medical treatments with off-label drugs and, above all, in the lockdowns / visiting bans, especially for nursing homes. This is having an extreme impact in Italy, the country with the oldest population in the EU.
The lack of under-mortality after the curve can be explained by the fact that it was an exceptional situation, whereby people who would have died in 2, 3.. years' time, for example, also died. The fact that the vaccinations only came in the following years means that this is not noticeable, as the vaccination contributes to excess mortality.
My current assessment is that the lack of under-mortality after the peak is a statistical anomaly, whereby the actual events are somewhat neglected.
And the fact that the same curves also exist in other cities around the world can be used as an argument for both sides; on the one hand that the statistics have been manipulated or that they have actually taken place as a result of the measures. In my opinion, the coordinated manipulation of figures is a bold hypothesis.
Thank you for directing us to your analysis. We will take a look.
Our interest is in spring 2020 as an event on its own and largely divorced from actual definitions of excess (which are usually assessed on an annual basis) and from vaccine deployment, except to note (as we have) the seeming lack of impact of the COVID shot and boosters on daily ACM. My overall emphasis in analysis re: spring 2020 has been on smaller geographical units (cities, provinces/counties).
Re: "lack of under-mortality after the peak is a statistical anomaly, whereby the actual events are somewhat neglected" - "statistical anomaly" is not an explanation. It's a sign that something isn't quite right. :)
Coordinated manipulation is, indeed, a bold hypothesis. I do not make it lightly or without much consideration.
By ‘exceptional situation’ I meant the exceptional closures or visiting bans and isolation in nursing homes as well as the increased intubation (incl. offlabel use of medication). I am also looking for concrete figures on when, where and how many people died during the first lockdown in 2020 in the province of Bergamo.
If we look at the mortality curves for the northern Italian cities for 2020, we can see that the noticeable increase in mortality was not only for Bergamo, but also for Brescia. Then Bergamo AND Brescia must have manipulated data.
Another striking observation is that Milan also has an increased mortality rate in the second lockdown at the end of 2020, while nothing is happening in Bergamo and Brescia. From this, one could conclude that if Milan has taken correspondingly tough isolation/respiratory measures, the peak could possibly occur after all.
My current working hypothesis is that in New York people died mainly due to ventilation/iatrogenic treatments*, while in Italy people died mainly in nursing homes. However, I have not been able to obtain any reliable figures or information on this.
"On the flip-side, Germany, Australia, New Zealand, Hawaii were staged as paragons of Doing the Right Thing to Keep the Virus at Bay While Awaiting a Vaccine."
The excess deaths above the 2015- 2019 mean in New Zealand and Australia (2020 - 2024) demonstrate near perfect concordance from 2020. The deaths post shot are horrendous and the slaughter continues unfettered while mandates persist in many workplaces. These countries do indeed appear to form an Oceania arm of the ongoing 'experiment' in jab uptake at its very best. Unsurprising really. It should be kept in mind that their populace appear readily biddable, rules driven, highly conformist, willingly compliant, and very heavily over-governed at every level, with the added zest of dobbers and snitchers in NZ and thuggish Stasi-like Lice in OZ, rinsed in with a widespread socialist mind-set. These countries were ripe for the globalist plucking as Bloomfield, Ardern and Jane Halton showed. And the evil farce continues tragically to this day.
Germany, perhaps for reasons of history, seems to have been unwilling to have doctors implement death protocols in hospitals. But they made up for it with the BioNTech shots.
Germany is supposed to have restricted access to care/nursing homes, thus reducing deaths but as you say they seem to have made up for it later. Very Nazi shots.
Northern Italy region was target for this plan because of it's aging population lifetime exposure to industrial toxins & subsequent increased health issues . Government stated pathogenic causation , when in fact it was oversight negligence in regulating pollution and dangerous environmental health risks .
It was in fact one of the best regions in Europe to create the illusion of catastrophic contagion and, with no small amount of hep, the Corona orchestrators succeeded in doing exactly that.
Very good to see this progress on getting to the bottom of the construction plan for THE two key (and clearly linked) events which were used to spread ‘shock and awe’ on both sides of the Atlantic and condition populations for the next phases of the operation. This now has to get more into the mainstream resistance consciousness. It was the first, and a very essential, data fraud manipulation to create the illusion of a lightening killer pathogen where nothing of the sort existed, not the only data manipulation by far throughout the fake pandemic, but the most essential one of all.
Thanks for sharing your work, Virginia. I had not seen this before because I am only a fairly recent user of Substack. I think you are saying similar to what Denis Rancourt concluded, if I am not mistaken. To be clear, I agree that a democide took place to a greater or lesser extent in many different country locations due to iatrogenic causes - and then the jabs. It is just that in a few locations of geopolitical significance, Bergamo & NYC being the most prominent examples (but there are surely some others), that data fraud must have been used to manufacture an illusion of ‘catastrophic contagion’ just like in the movie. Because, as you have pointed out so eloquently, the novel smart-virus had the capability to do all these highly surprising things in some places and not in others (as well to exactly understand what was required of it and when - perhaps that was to exercise the minds of the world’s greatest epidemiologists, which it succeeded in doing). Here in Germany where I have just recently learned that data fraud (i.e. creating or subtracting deaths or moving dates of death) cannot be done, there was no excess death in the first wave. Death protocols were not used to any degree in hospitals. The smart virus only became active when the antidote arrived.
Pretty sure death certs are available in both NJ and NY state, except for the 5 counties of NYC proper. The death spike increased deaths 100% or more in 25 counties in the NYC metro area, located in NJ and NY state, so Hockett should be able to verify the deaths in the other 20 counties.
I was interested by the point of how the bodies were handled. It reminded me of when I was a young hospital doctor in the 69 flu epidemic. The fridges in the mortuary were full. Those coffins that were the overspill could not be laid flat but were standing up. The mortuary attendant was in constant communication with undertakers to take the coffins to make space.
After Fergussons 500,000 prediction I felt we were in "bodies in the street" territory.
I remember being bemused by the flippant reference by Boris Johnson as to who knows what is happening in Italy. This was his reasoning for us to start doing the bizarre covid rules. I read these articles and thank you for reassuring me that I wasn't wrong to question what was happening, it didn't make sense. One of my sons was quite upset by my reluctance to believe. He has never since acknowledged that it may not have been as he thought.
Yes, none of it made sense. It was a competence test, gradually increasing in insanity to see just how far people would go before realising they had been well and truly 'had'. From my WordPress site.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/g-is-for-guidance/
It amazes me that still there are those who have failed to have any real clue at all as to what was going on.
As you say--the 1000% increase followed by a similar decrease is not believable.
Actually IF a virus was that deadly would there not be similar increases everywhere else?
Indeed. The entire story is totally ludicrous.
I have also written an article about Italy and Bergamo. I can agree with you that it can't just be a virus from an epidemiological point of view. This would have to have been isolated first anyway.
In my opinion, the causes of the deaths lie in the too early intubations / medical treatments with off-label drugs and, above all, in the lockdowns / visiting bans, especially for nursing homes. This is having an extreme impact in Italy, the country with the oldest population in the EU.
The lack of under-mortality after the curve can be explained by the fact that it was an exceptional situation, whereby people who would have died in 2, 3.. years' time, for example, also died. The fact that the vaccinations only came in the following years means that this is not noticeable, as the vaccination contributes to excess mortality.
My current assessment is that the lack of under-mortality after the peak is a statistical anomaly, whereby the actual events are somewhat neglected.
And the fact that the same curves also exist in other cities around the world can be used as an argument for both sides; on the one hand that the statistics have been manipulated or that they have actually taken place as a result of the measures. In my opinion, the coordinated manipulation of figures is a bold hypothesis.
Enclosed is my article: https://neuemedizinbibliothek.substack.com/p/die-corona-aufarbeitung-teil-4-untersuchung
Perhaps this can be read with the translation function.
Thank you for your published analyses and open-ended discussion.
Good day.
Thank you for directing us to your analysis. We will take a look.
Our interest is in spring 2020 as an event on its own and largely divorced from actual definitions of excess (which are usually assessed on an annual basis) and from vaccine deployment, except to note (as we have) the seeming lack of impact of the COVID shot and boosters on daily ACM. My overall emphasis in analysis re: spring 2020 has been on smaller geographical units (cities, provinces/counties).
I've written about the factors you mention with respect to New York City. My assertion is that even with all iatrogenic measures taken into account, the toll is too high to not have been manipulated and (like Bergamo) does not represent a real-time event. https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/eleven-serious-problems-with-the | https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/the-f-word
Can you elaborate on "exceptional situation"?
Re: "lack of under-mortality after the peak is a statistical anomaly, whereby the actual events are somewhat neglected" - "statistical anomaly" is not an explanation. It's a sign that something isn't quite right. :)
Coordinated manipulation is, indeed, a bold hypothesis. I do not make it lightly or without much consideration.
By ‘exceptional situation’ I meant the exceptional closures or visiting bans and isolation in nursing homes as well as the increased intubation (incl. offlabel use of medication). I am also looking for concrete figures on when, where and how many people died during the first lockdown in 2020 in the province of Bergamo.
If we look at the mortality curves for the northern Italian cities for 2020, we can see that the noticeable increase in mortality was not only for Bergamo, but also for Brescia. Then Bergamo AND Brescia must have manipulated data.
Another striking observation is that Milan also has an increased mortality rate in the second lockdown at the end of 2020, while nothing is happening in Bergamo and Brescia. From this, one could conclude that if Milan has taken correspondingly tough isolation/respiratory measures, the peak could possibly occur after all.
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_mwk3_t__custom_13766954/default/line?lang=en
My current working hypothesis is that in New York people died mainly due to ventilation/iatrogenic treatments*, while in Italy people died mainly in nursing homes. However, I have not been able to obtain any reliable figures or information on this.
*https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/new-york-city-spring-2020-emergency
"On the flip-side, Germany, Australia, New Zealand, Hawaii were staged as paragons of Doing the Right Thing to Keep the Virus at Bay While Awaiting a Vaccine."
The excess deaths above the 2015- 2019 mean in New Zealand and Australia (2020 - 2024) demonstrate near perfect concordance from 2020. The deaths post shot are horrendous and the slaughter continues unfettered while mandates persist in many workplaces. These countries do indeed appear to form an Oceania arm of the ongoing 'experiment' in jab uptake at its very best. Unsurprising really. It should be kept in mind that their populace appear readily biddable, rules driven, highly conformist, willingly compliant, and very heavily over-governed at every level, with the added zest of dobbers and snitchers in NZ and thuggish Stasi-like Lice in OZ, rinsed in with a widespread socialist mind-set. These countries were ripe for the globalist plucking as Bloomfield, Ardern and Jane Halton showed. And the evil farce continues tragically to this day.
Germany, perhaps for reasons of history, seems to have been unwilling to have doctors implement death protocols in hospitals. But they made up for it with the BioNTech shots.
Germany is supposed to have restricted access to care/nursing homes, thus reducing deaths but as you say they seem to have made up for it later. Very Nazi shots.
Northern Italy region was target for this plan because of it's aging population lifetime exposure to industrial toxins & subsequent increased health issues . Government stated pathogenic causation , when in fact it was oversight negligence in regulating pollution and dangerous environmental health risks .
It was in fact one of the best regions in Europe to create the illusion of catastrophic contagion and, with no small amount of hep, the Corona orchestrators succeeded in doing exactly that.
https://21stcenturywire.com/2023/03/07/italy-2020-inside-covids-ground-zero-in-europe/
Similar situation to Wuhan in many ways, cold air, industrial pollution etc. Easy to promote fake idea of transmission.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/wuhan-flu?utm_source=publication-search
Very good to see this progress on getting to the bottom of the construction plan for THE two key (and clearly linked) events which were used to spread ‘shock and awe’ on both sides of the Atlantic and condition populations for the next phases of the operation. This now has to get more into the mainstream resistance consciousness. It was the first, and a very essential, data fraud manipulation to create the illusion of a lightening killer pathogen where nothing of the sort existed, not the only data manipulation by far throughout the fake pandemic, but the most essential one of all.
Much easier to imagine it was data fraud rather than intentional mass-murder. Problem is, it looks more intentional mass murder--maybe that's why deaths were covered up. https://www.virginiastoner.com/writing/2024/8/30/the-us-democide-of-2020-2022-in-a-nutshell-kjl68
You aren’t responding to any of the points made. You never do. Moreover, we have not denied the democidal aspect of the event.
Thanks for sharing your work, Virginia. I had not seen this before because I am only a fairly recent user of Substack. I think you are saying similar to what Denis Rancourt concluded, if I am not mistaken. To be clear, I agree that a democide took place to a greater or lesser extent in many different country locations due to iatrogenic causes - and then the jabs. It is just that in a few locations of geopolitical significance, Bergamo & NYC being the most prominent examples (but there are surely some others), that data fraud must have been used to manufacture an illusion of ‘catastrophic contagion’ just like in the movie. Because, as you have pointed out so eloquently, the novel smart-virus had the capability to do all these highly surprising things in some places and not in others (as well to exactly understand what was required of it and when - perhaps that was to exercise the minds of the world’s greatest epidemiologists, which it succeeded in doing). Here in Germany where I have just recently learned that data fraud (i.e. creating or subtracting deaths or moving dates of death) cannot be done, there was no excess death in the first wave. Death protocols were not used to any degree in hospitals. The smart virus only became active when the antidote arrived.
Pretty sure death certs are available in both NJ and NY state, except for the 5 counties of NYC proper. The death spike increased deaths 100% or more in 25 counties in the NYC metro area, located in NJ and NY state, so Hockett should be able to verify the deaths in the other 20 counties.
I was interested by the point of how the bodies were handled. It reminded me of when I was a young hospital doctor in the 69 flu epidemic. The fridges in the mortuary were full. Those coffins that were the overspill could not be laid flat but were standing up. The mortuary attendant was in constant communication with undertakers to take the coffins to make space.
After Fergussons 500,000 prediction I felt we were in "bodies in the street" territory.
Along those lines, you can perhaps appreciate the audacity of the claim about decedent turnover in New York:
https://open.substack.com/pub/woodhouse/p/did-this-happen-lincoln-medical-center?r=jjay2&utm_medium=ios