84 Comments

Sweden is an excellent case study in the 'effectiveness' of "focused protection."

In short this meant 'effectively' isolating, terrorizing, abandoning and/or drugging (an already heavily medicated strata) the fragile elderly ("most vulnerable" to make it sound kindly) who live in institutionalized settings. This led to 'effectively' killing lots of these elderly folks in a compressed time frame.

The administrative barbarism/slaughter was (and still is) fobbed off as the work of some deadly invisible microbe and the debate then becomes subjective.

Only when the cloak of the entire deception is fully removed will the entire arsenal of death protocols be understood for what they were and only then will the magnitude of this sinister racketeering operation be seen for what it is.

Expand full comment

I think that it is important to note that all of the NATO countries seemed to follow the same playbook regarding the Covid response. Sweden was NOT a NATO member during that time (but did gain membership 03/07/2024). This adds support to the theory that the whole “pandemic” and the response, was a military operation. It will be interesting to see how Sweden responds to the next “pandemic”.

Expand full comment

True but even Russia had their own dangerous shots.

This scam is global. They are somehow enemies of the West, China too but went along with the bullshit?!

Expand full comment

Common link with Russia (Putin) is the World Economic Forum. China also embraces WEF. It is global technocracy as the new preferred way of ruling. It does not matter that these countries are ‘enemies’ - their leaders need to adopt the same and most effective tools available for managing the masses. A good overview of global technocracy here from Dr David Hughes. https://odysee.com/@Illusion2Reality:b/2.-Omniwar---David-Hughes---Symposium-48mins-37secs:2

Expand full comment

I hear you

Expand full comment

“When it comes to Sweden, there was only one rule: Nothing on paper.”

- John W Vessey Jr., Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (1982-1985)

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00108369921961825

Expand full comment

exactly, I agree...the same post I would have written.

There is evidence in the minutes that all the technical-scientific committees of the various nations were participated in and subordinated to figures imposed by NATO. This supports Sasha Latypopva's thesis about the DOD military operation and the E.U.A. countermeasures...Sweden was the only state outside NATO at the time.

Expand full comment

They injected the people in Russia and China too. So it's NATO++ running the psyops.

Even all the jabs is fake.

Expand full comment

Is NATO necessary? A phone call and few bucks would have had the same effect.

Expand full comment

There is hard proof of that NATO involvement, Robert.

FOI documents, requested by Cees van den Bos (see his substack below) here in NL show that local intelligence organization (NCTV) was in full contact with NATO, this includes the UK.

I am impressed by the amount of effort he put in this, and I am sure he wont mind if I share this substack.

It basically describes how they gained access of all media channels. One 'Covid show' broadcasted by NOS (our BBC) was fully funded by the government, all 'questions' were predefined. Some other remarkable aspects: In some mail exchanges they ask for more 'scary' pictures. No doubt to instill more fear on people. And in Februari 2020, the RIVM (governments health department) quotes that Covid-19 is not more sever than a flu. They built up an anti 'desinformation' unit in which all major social platforms took part, and which had direct access to the main stream media. Papers and tv channels.

Oh, and by the way, the person who ran the NCTV during Covid is now prime minister. And the person who was Prime minister during the 'pandemic' is now secretary general of NATO.... (Mark Rutte, aka 'Teflon Mark'). No revolving door jobs at all...

The link:

https://bomenenbos.substack.com/p/de-orkestratie-van-een-staatsgreep

Expand full comment

This is how they will respond. The architecture is already in place (and involves the military - NATO - so also the USA ). There will be no ‘outliers next time.

https://health.ec.europa.eu/health-emergency-preparedness-and-response-hera_en

Expand full comment

They call it 'interoperability'.

"Are you saying it's a worldwide "conspiracy" for these countries to do the same thing at the same time? How do they get everyone to go along with that?"

"Yes, I'm saying exactly that. They all sat in the same room at the same time and made plans to do what they are doing. They all go along with it as they are all on the same team."

Expand full comment

What many people don’t understand is that there have been 25 YEARS of rehearsals in the form of scenario planed tabletop simulations starting at Andrews Airforce Base in Washington DC & culminating in Event 201 in late 2019. There have been yet others since, presumably because they plan to scare the population silly again and inject them with injurious materials again.

Expand full comment

Abbreviated version:

June 22–23 2001 OPERATION DARK WINTER.

October 23 2001 Model State Emergency Health Powers Act.

May 27 2003 The United States Leadership Against Global HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria Act of 2003 is signed into law.

September 8-10 2003 Global Mercury: An International Bioterrorism Exercise.

July 21 2004 The Project BioShield Act of 2004.

2005 The World Health Organization (WHO) establishes International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR).

January 14 2005 Atlantic Storm sponsored by the Johns Hopkins Center.This drill simulated bioterrorism attacks on the transatlantic community.

September 30 2005 The Biodefense and Pandemic Vaccine and Drug Development Act of 2005.

December 30 2005- The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act) signed into law.

May 2010 Rockefeller Foundation publishes Scenarios For The Future Of Technology And International Development including “Lock Step” Simulation Scenario.

October 23 2017 SPARS Pandemic Scenario conducted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security.

May 15 2018 Clade X Simulation

MAY 2018 The WHO and the World Bank announced the convening of the new Global Preparedness Monitoring Board. 

January 1 2019 The World Health Organisation (WHO) began planning a new decade of vaccines called Immunisation Agenda 2030 (IA2030).

January 24 2019 Beginning of Operation Crimson Contagion, a large US exercise simulating a global influenza pandemic that ran through August 2019.

February 14 2019 Munich Tabletop Simulation with global senior leaders. The tabletop exercise in Munich was inspired by Bill Gates’ ‘prophecies‘ at 2017 MSC, In the 2019 final report “A Spreading Plague: Lessons and Recommendations for Responding to a Deliberate Biological Event“,  Gates’ speech was quoted verbatim.

May 8 2019 "Top-class congress" in Germany convenes the CDU/CSU parliamentary group in the Bundestag to discuss the topic “Strengthening global health – implementing the UN Sustainable Development Goal”.

October 18 2019 "Event 201 Simulation of a Pandemic"- Johns Hopkins teams up with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to conduct the simulation.

October 28-29 2019 Future of Health Conference at Milken Institute- Universal Flu Vaccine discussion.

December 2-3 2019 World Health Organization holds a Global Vaccine Safety Summit in Geneva. "At the Summit, WHO will present the Global Vaccine Safety Blueprint 2.0 strategy 2021-2030.

December 9-10 2019 Pacific Eclipse a pandemic tabletop exercise conducted.

January 21-24 2020 The World Economic Forum (WEF)’s annual meeting takes place in Davos, Switzerland, where both the economy and vaccinations are discussed. Media rollout of the "pandemic" occurs over the next two days.

January 22 2020 The Johns Hopkins University and Johns Hopkins Medicine launch the Coronavirus Resource Center, their coronavirus tracking dashboard.

January 22, 2020 Netflix documentary Pandemic: How to Prevent an Outbreak is released.

January 24th, 2020 viral video footage spreads throughout the world showing people collapsing in the streets of China.

February 4 2020 WHO released their Strategic Preparedness and Response Plan.

February 8 2020 The World Health Organization (WHO) announces its four-pronged approach to fight "misinformation and conspiracy theories" that make "fighting the coronavirus harder."

March 9 2020 Black Monday 1: Stock market takes first historic drop of 2020 crash- DJI Avg drops -7.99%.

March 11 2020 The WHO officially declares a Worldwide pandemic.

Expand full comment

https://alexkrainer.substack.com/p/are-they-planning-a-false-flag-event

Are they planning a false flag event in London?

Very nearly all of London's Webcams went dark in early September. Why?

They may bypass the next pandemic and go straight for the nuclear option.

Radiation is on the list with marburg and ebola and will trigger a public health emergency.

Expand full comment

With enough money and DEW's, you can control every country on earth.

Expand full comment

The only goal now is to perpetuate the psyop. That’s why they love the natural origin/Wuhan lab argument. Either way, it perpetuates the myth that a deadly virus was created, spread and killed.

Yes, China and Russia are complicit. These angry “wars” with China and Russia are just for show.

Expand full comment

Nobody did it quite the same so that the wise would figure out the scam. For example, Germany had only limited restrictions of care homes I gather.

Expand full comment

If my income weren't $1,012/mo in Social Security Retirement with $269/mo in Food Stamps I'd subscribe. However, you're consistently correct and for me that's what counts. I don't know your background and I'm not a doctor and while I dropped out of college from sheer boredom my own background is physics and if this were a physics problem I would have solved it long ago. Thank goodness for people such as yourself Jonathan. While many are still lost, those that believe in you know the truth.

Expand full comment

17 plus Jonathan, my sincerest thanks to all, JP

Expand full comment

John Ioannidis, praising Tegnell/Sweden and New Zealand, 4 October 2024:

"The worst disaster was United States and Bulgaria. If you limit to less than 65 years old, we're far worse than anywhere else in the world. The best? Sweden. And I'm very happy to have Anders Tegnell today with us. It's the first time that we meet in person, and I think he is Legend, for sure. And also New Zealand. So, you know, two countries that had very different approaches to how they would handle the crisis."https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/transcript-john-ioannidis-closing

Note "the crisis"

What crisis? 🧐

Expand full comment

Exactly!

What crisis?

It was admitted from the beginning that the respiratory symptoms called “COVID-19” weren’t a serious threat to most people, so why was there a ‘vaccine solution’?

Expand full comment

Branding unremarkable respiratory symptoms new cause of death was an act of fraud and a crime, so I can't cede the point that anything was admitted. :)

Expand full comment

Well it depends on how you look at it...

I was looking at in early 2020, so my perspective might be different, and my views have developed over the years.

What was your view in early 2020? Did you know then what you know now?

Expand full comment

No, I didn't, have said as much, and I only care about what people think now. I hope everyone's views have developed.

We agree a shot wasn't needed.

Expand full comment

Jessica, you say "Branding unremarkable respiratory symptoms new cause of death was an act of fraud and a crime..."

I agree with you. And it's also important to realise the perpetrators admitted the disease they tried to terrorise people with wasn't a serious threat to most people...this was the act of fraud and a crime...

Expand full comment

Actually, the US was not saying that exactly - they were suddenly saying in mid-March that it posed a threat to young people and sent millions of post-cards to homes saying ao. https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/timeline-the-young-and-healthy-are

A late March Austrailia 60 Minutes feature with an NYC doctor reiterated that idea 2-3 times https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/what-australians-were-being-told

We then had a parade propaganda pieces about young deaths. (Most of the announced Patient 1s in various countries were men in their 30s...huh)

Why?

Fraud & crimes all the way down, but I think people have forgotten that the perpetrators (with the help of scripted doctors) were pushing a narrative about "young people too" between March and May 2020.

At least in the US, this was a key component of getting ppl to think the 15-day illegal quarantine order, and 30-day extension, were needed.

Expand full comment

Makes me think of Supertramp's Crime of the century album, although that was before Crisis, what Crisis?

Expand full comment

Just multiple arms in a running globalist assault...

At time of writing (Feb 2024) the data for 2024 are almost complete for both Australia and Sweden, and completed for New Zealand, the running total of excess deaths above the 2015 - 2019 mean since 2020 are seen in the staggering figures below.

New Zealand: 12,670 deaths ~ (population 5.3M) ~ (0.24% deaths) ~ (x 3 Sweden)

Australia: 56,790 deaths ~ (population 26.5M) ~ (0.21% deaths) ~ (x 2.63 Sweden)

Sweden: 8792 ~ (population: 10.7M) ~ (0.08% deaths)

As may be seen, New Zealand leads the national funeral pyres with x 3 the number of excess deaths% of total population since 2020, with Australia close behind. Meanwhile excess deaths above the weekly mean continue to bounce along merrily in baffling silence between 15 - 20% above the weekly mean into 2024.

Sweden sits far below.

Booster anyone?

https://drlatusdextro.substack.com/p/australian-senate-acknowledges-excess

Expand full comment

If, as Jessica Hockett and I assert, the mortality curves for Bergamo, NYC, and probably a number of other locations are fraudulent, I don’t see why trust can or should (necessarily) be placed on numbers from elsewhere from which excess deaths are calculated.

Expand full comment

A suggestion here with the feel of a double edged sword intent on dissolving all trust in any data based on the likely corruption of some data, leading to a cultivated destruction of 'generalisability'?

One considers that countries like NZ or Australia (and others), who have at their disposal a bureaucratic edifice readily capable of assembling a competent picture of all of the requisite data points of the control population and intervention population with the detailed consequences of the unethical, toxic shots must surely out themselves in time.

Whatever took place in Oceania and Scandinavia appears quite different. While the data does not have the appearance of being tampered with, I agree that this is possible. Until proved otherwise it seem reasonable to await a confirmation of a generalisability that it was? In addition, corroborative data may continue to helpfully emerge from insurance, something to which Ed Dowd alludes.

Expand full comment

It's also not true that Sweden "had no lockdown". I went on holiday to Stockholm in September 2020. Were they more sensible than Britain? Yes. Did things feel more normal than London? Yes. Were the shops busy and the bars and restaurants packed? Yes.

But consider what policies were nevertheless in place when I visited. Firstly, entry to the country was barred for non-EU/non-EEA nationals. (This meant British nationals were allowed in but only until the Brexit transition period ended 31 Jan 2021.)

Secondly, hospitality was restricted. No clubs were open. There were curfews for bars and restaurants and there was no standing permitted (and therefore no dancing or overt mingling). They still banned mass gatherings and in-person lessons for the over-16s and university students. They still recommended WFH and advised against group meet-ups -- and we know how easily "recommendations" become public health orders when placed in the hands of institutions and corporations.

My understanding is that it's a quirk of Sweden's constitution that stay-at-home guidance was not codified into law, and it's a reflection of their high-trust society that the government never used authoritarian language or employed the use of heavy-handed enforcement.

This does not, however, mean that they "did nothing". They not only did things that are very much consistent with lockdown dogma, but they never challenged the pandemic narrative. No, they upheld it and my understanding is that things only got worse with the vaccine rollout.

Expand full comment

🎯🎯🎯 These spoon fed heroes for the counter narrative are why we are five years in and still dealing with lies upon lies. The counter narrative operation and their followers are as micromanaged as the mainstream as it is easy to steer tgeflock back to the same establishment rapists for a leader when the heroes they've supplied keep pushing the susceptible in that direction, instead of towards the leaders within.

Expand full comment

As far as I’m aware there was no Western country which said “There is no pandemic so we are not doing anything.” Naturally, we are not going to hear much from the media other than criticism about what happened in any locations which effectively rejected the pandemic narrative group response. I wonder were there any locations in more remote / undeveloped areas of the world where this happened? I seem to recall there was push back from one or two African countries. Here is what a quick search yielded about Tanzania:

Tanzania's Pandemic Narrative Rejection

Based on the search results provided, it appears that Tanzania’s government, under President John Magufuli, rejected the global narrative on COVID-19 and downplayed the severity of the pandemic. Here are some key points:

Denial of cases and deaths: The government stopped releasing official COVID-19 statistics, including cases and deaths, in April 2020. This lack of transparency made it difficult to track the spread of the virus.

Claim of divine intervention: President Magufuli attributed Tanzania’s supposed freedom from COVID-19 to divine intervention, stating that God had removed the virus from the country.

Limited public health responses: The government did not implement widespread public health measures, such as lockdowns, testing, or contact tracing, to combat the pandemic.

Criticism of foreign expertise: President Magufuli rejected foreign expertise and advice on COVID-19, instead promoting local remedies and prayer as solutions.

Restrictions on information: The government restricted access to information about COVID-19, including suspending local media outlets and punishing individuals who reported on the pandemic.

Selective compliance: While Tanzania received international funds and negotiated border testing procedures, the government’s internal practices and rhetoric continued to deny the severity of the pandemic.

In summary, Tanzania’s government under President Magufuli rejected the global narrative on COVID-19, downplayed the severity of the pandemic, and implemented limited public health responses. This approach was characterized by a mix of denial, skepticism towards foreign expertise, and restrictions on information.

It would be good to know more about what happened in places like this. I suspect that life went on pretty much as normal.

Expand full comment

I know you know that Magufuli was almost certainly murdered because of his stance. He’s alleged to have died of a non-existent illness.

I presented to one of the MPs who was a skeptic and a preacher who ran outside services on Sundays to 20,000 people at a time. He asked me only three questions:

1. Was the vaccine necessary?

2. Is the vaccine effective?

3. Is the vaccine safe?

To which I replied No, No and no, with justifications.

Expand full comment

The president appears to have been eliminated with prejudice for his public stance, along with two others who did so. I don't think any other world leaders objected after that. If readers have contrary/additional information, please opine.

Expand full comment

Yes, I had heard that also. Probably the data has also been tampered with but where has it not been. I have a feeling that Uganda also did not do much, at least initially.

Expand full comment

Despite being an outlier throughout 2020, Sweden ultimately went along with the COVID-19 vaccination agenda - why?

In response to Jonathan's article, I've shared on my substack an email I sent to Anders Tegnell in December 2020, challenging him about the implementation of COVID-19 vaccination in Sweden, including reference to Bill Gates’ plan to vaccinate the global population against coronavirus, and questioning the definition of ‘COVID-19’ cases via highly controversial PCR testing.

See: December 2020 - Why did Sweden implement COVID-19 vaccination? https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/december-2020-why-did-sweden-implement

Expand full comment

The two biggest reasons IMHO why almost every nation on earth acquiesced to the jab rollout are 1) monetary inducements, 2) threats, primarily in the form of DEW's and total economic warfare via the BIS.

Expand full comment

We need to know who was actually pulling the strings on all this...

Expand full comment

Did you receive a reply from Tegnell?

Expand full comment

No I didn't...

Expand full comment

Thank you, Jonathan, for being continually outraged at the confection of lies being used even now to convince the gullible that there was a better or best practice way to “handle pandemic emergencies”.

In reality, “best practice” involves arresting and charging numerous people & heads of institutions for lying & conspiring to frighten entire populations in order to bring about major changes to society, in Lockstep, as it were.

Expand full comment

And eventually we're going to have to start charging specific individuals with murder. Mass murder. Otherwise we have given up on the value of human life.

Expand full comment

Absolutely Jonathan, essentially there was never anything to respond to! Sweden didn’t get it right, the only sane and reasonable ‘right’ approach was to do NOTHING.

Expand full comment

True. Thankfully because they all did something and never quite the same it became obvious if one didn't know before that the whole thing was a scam.

And that vaccines and virology were a fraud.

Among a whole list of other things of course.

Expand full comment

COPIED

I wrote a letter and informed the World Medical Association and have received an answer.

My moral responsibility as a doctor to inform is completed. As is my days as a whistleblower.

My work to inform the world about the harmful strategy of Sweden has now come to an end.

Link to WORD:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ojdxfwHw_hUcr-100foucaVFUvbClkjV/view?usp=drivesdk

Link to PDF

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1onuy8B8zXg1wvhhZATm12Tv4xgQivktJ/view?usp=drivesdk

Link to answer from WMA:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ISkBwn4zjrNs1K9NcRf_varZ3LKMlnTK/view?usp=drivesdk

My full text to WMA:

Illegal euthanasia implemented via Sweden´s official Covid-19 strategies, and the resulting consequences needing urgent WMA intervention

Dr Jon Tallinger

Kristinebergsgatan 11

575 39 Eksjö

Sweden.

+46738092974

Dr.tallinger@gmail.com

www.drtallinger.se

8 July 2020

Dr Miguel R. Jorge (President)

Dr David Barbe (President Elect)

Dr Andreas Rudkjøbing (Chair of the Ethics Committee)

All Leaders & Council Members of World Medical Association

13, ch. du Levant

CIB – Bâtiment A

01210 Ferney-Voltaire

France

Official Sweden Covid-19 directives of senicide force Illegal Euthanasia on vulnerable elderly; doctors compromised

Dear fellow medical colleagues,

    I am a 50-year-old specialist i allmänmedicin (general practitioner in Sweden with specific responsibilities) urgently appealing to the World Medical Association to officially approach the government of Sweden and make them accountable to my fellow medical colleagues in Sweden and worldwide, regarding a lack of ethics in 4 important issues which completely violate the Hippocratic Oath, Declaration of Helsinki and a declaration adopted at the 70th WMA General Assembly in Georgia during October 2019 against Euthanasia & Physician-Assisted Suicide:

1) Official directives specifically focus on elderly in nursing homes and deny them oxygen and basic medical attention such as being sent to hospitals, but are remotely prescribed Morphine and Midazolam if they are infected with SARS-CoV-2 without actual examinations while withholding information about official directives affecting the elderly. This results in disregarding the wishes of their loves ones who eventually wind up with the anguish of losing their parent(s).

2) Questioning and insisting on making public the statistics rendered confidential and not available to the Swedish public during this period of the pandemic, which definitely affects Sweden’s official approach on issues such as the extent of insufficient PPE, insufficient medical equipment including drugs for treating pneumonia, insufficient hospital beds, purchasing of testing reagents for Covid-19 tests, and withholding the journals of the elderly in nursing homes containing information to confirm unethical decisions and actions killing the elderly.

3) Sweden’s official strategies are justified by state epidemiologist Anders Tegnell. He has been wrong on too many occasions while refusing to provide necessary science to justify his experimental approach for months, and his pattern of consistent errors for months has made me question whether he understands the responsibilities and ethics of being an epidemiologist in public health. I can only conclude that Sweden’s official approach is forcing more than 10 million lives in Sweden to experience an ongoing process of herd immunity without a vaccine.  

4) Swedish doctors being forced to obey official directives going against fundamental medical ethics as doctors while officially disregarding the lives and basic rights of patients and inflicting inhumane human rights violations, or being reported and then penalised if failing to adhere to such official directives, while the creators of such inhumane directives are still unidentified. 

Since a few days after my going public on the issue on 10 April, I have been on official leave from my medical duties, in order to try to collect as much information as possible to add to what I was forced to confront in the official directives I have been given to carry out.

Full letter in links above

Expand full comment

I am in total agreement with your assessment re: Sweden. It serves as a conversation stopper which prevents people from understanding the full gravity of the democidal worldwide event that began in 2020, which was a globalist (read Satanically) inspired, planned, humanicide program, carried out with military precision after decades of preparation. All the enabling legislation/regulations were carefully crafted in the US and many other countries (see work of Katherine Watt and Kyle Young on substack for example). A myriad of practice sessions ala Event 201 helped make the 2020 created event, much more efficient. Nothing has been done to stop it. Tragically, people have not awakened, en-masse, to the horrific truth of what has been done. As a result, it will likely continue, barring divine intervention.

Expand full comment

I have disagreed with Kevin Bass before regarding the safe/effective premise, but I agree with him on this narrow point. Anders Tegnell has this going for him:

1) said COVID was flu-like in lethality, and that lockdowns were like using a hammer to kill a fly

2) said vaccines will not ever be a "silver-bullet"

3) said policies require justification (bureaucrats should not be able to make policy on the fly)

4) made special note on how others' mask policy changed without any change in mask science

5) noted how spread doesn't correlate well with death, because death has too many factors

Expand full comment

Ultimately his shameful acquiescence on vaccine policy - all the more weird when he went on about the harms of lockdowns, seemingly oblivious to the harms (potential or known) of novel gene therapies - trashes all that.

Expand full comment

Yes, I agree, it is odd behavior because he only mentioned lacking efficacy and not safety. But also keep in mind how he had to live with police protection at least some of the time, and how he is currently not in the public eye -- as if he has now dropped off of the face of the earth.

Expand full comment

It would be a very good thing if he had dropped off - permanently!

Expand full comment

The Ministry of Truth is staffed by brilliant people (including psychologists) who use very clever strategies to make you think you are winning... when you are not.

Substack is part of this https://fasteddynz.substack.com/p/substack-a-ministry-of-truth-production

Expand full comment

No one but the globalist perpetrators are winning.

Expand full comment

Yes, there is no doubt that Substack's function is to collect and monitor dissent.

The security service operatives, have however, had their children poisoned via childhood vaccines - sudden infant death, autism auto-immune disease, chronic allergy - just as much as the rest of us. This poisoning has been done to the state's own military personnel and their families over the last thirty years without the need for any exposure to additional toxicity in the form of covid injections.

Why do they continue working for bosses who have contempt for them and who will also eliminate their children and them?

Expand full comment

Anders Tegnell is one of many public health morons who deserve to be stripped of all wealth and flung into jail and left to rot. His wikipedia page says

"Tegnell was embroiled in controversy due to his role in the mass vaccination scheme of 5 million Swedes against swine flu, which caused about 500 children to develop narcolepsy.Tegnell was reported as saying of Pandemrix, the vaccine that had been known to cause neurological issues in the UK and was not approved by the US FDA, that it would have been highly unethical not to vaccinate people because hundreds of Swedes risked dying."

Sweden's response was designed to help us understand how much of a scam the whole thing was. They locked down the care homes and the elderly were effectively abandoned like the UK. Despicable.

Expand full comment