Jonathan and Jessica, thank you so much for this piece, which is full of the candour and integrity that we are looking for in the society of the future. We cannot allow frustration to transform into bitterness towards those who are seeking the truth and a better world, but who necessarily do not share our own priorities. I salute 'Dave' for the fantastic work that he has done and continues to do. However I hope he can come to see that our cause is best served by actively praising those who have, and who continue to, put their heads above the parapet and broadcast as widely as possible their hard won insights. Only by integrating this knowledge, derived from a wide diversity of perspectives, will we be able to assemble a view of the world as it really is, and find the best solutions for our current predicament.
Thanks for your work, Dr Ennos, I remember your statistical research from early in the pandemic it was significant as it tracked the age groups with vaccine mortality as new and younger age groups qualified for "vaccination."
Many thanks for speaking out Prof.Ennos specifically focused on Scottish evidence. I am sure the inquiry and even UK COVID inquiry will have even more to tell us about the events from March 2020 but almost no one is watching due to widely promoted ''whitewash'' narratives despite my best intentions and passion to raise awareness that's not the whole story.
NB; I have often thanked HART group and others for the times they have mentioned Scottish inquiry the past months i've just been flummoxed at the lack of attention past 18 months vs Scottish evidence or if someone does cover it it's forgotten about when it's ongoing. See comment- https://hartuk.substack.com/p/pick-of-the-week-12th-march-2025/comments
I've encountered the same attitude from some others, as if it's an 'either/or' proposition, rather than a scandal to be challenged from a number of angles.
It really is weird... With friends like these...
I just take the attitude to push on, and focus on the objective, try not to be pushed off track by negative people with questionable motives.
The great pandemic machine has been constructed, rehearsed and prepared for manufactured emergencies for years and the Covid™ circuit breaker got it up and running full speed ahead.
I'm not here to make friends Elizabeth. My strong view is what happened in care homes and hospitals in 2020 deserves far more attention than the 'COVID vaccines.' I'm definetely not a negative person nor do i have 'questionable motives' that should be obvious.
biologyphenom, you say "My strong view is what happened in care homes and hospitals in 2020 deserves far more attention than the 'COVID vaccines.'"
That's your view, and of course it's important to bring attention to what happened in 'care' homes.
Meanwhile, I contend it is vital to seek accountability for coercive and mandatory medical interventions, i.e. the COVID-19 injections. This builds on the work I've been doing for more than 16 years investigating taxpayer-funded vaccination policy and practice, particularly coercive vaccination in Australia, e.g. where children are prey to more and more vaccine products - facilitated by the No Jab, No Pay/No Pay laws set in place from 2016.
These laws morphed into 'No Jab, No Job' to 'No Jab, No Life' edicts during 'Covid' times in Australia.
This may be of little or no significance to you biologyphenom, perhaps you weren't subjected to vaccine mandates that threatened your livelihood and participation in society.
This isn't an 'either/or' proposition - why do you denigrate other people's efforts? People who are motivated to get off their backsides and actually do something, it's their choice where to spend their time. The very odd situation is being maligned and sabotaged by people one might think would be onside...
In regard to your situation, you complain about everyone else from behind your pseudonym, and reject offers to share your point of view - e.g. you knocked back UKFMA and Ahmad Malik's offers to participate in their podcasts.
Instead of attacking other people who are doing their best to try and address a very big complicated picture, why don't you direct your ire to those 'in authority' who are actually accountable for the dire situation in care homes and elsewhere?
Thank you for writing this as I have been subjected to similar bullying, fallacious accusations, and abuse by this user, which is really a shame because he is only doing the Scottish Inquiry a disservice by behaving in such an off-putting and hateful manner.
Just as you’ve articulated so elegantly here, failure to cover a person’s favored topic does not indicate a lack of interest in or valuing of that subject but simply the constraints of the space-time continuum and the necessity to focus on our own particular passions as a matter of survival. I literally (and I mean this literally, not figuratively) have thousands of unfinished projects and research topic folders as well as hundreds of thousands of articles, videos, and other references saved for future examination, including the Scottish Inquiry. I have one article on vaxx injuries, for example, that I’ve been trying to finish since fall 2021 with more than 2,000 links to evaluate associated with that article alone.
This phenomenon (no pun intended ;-) extends beyond this particular user, however. I have lost count of the number of people who have badgered me about covering their pet topic. There are thousands of subjects I am interested in and agree are important to address, but I am only one human, and even working 29-hour days as I have been lately, it is still impossible for me to complete everything on my todo list let alone theirs. What I often tell these people is that if they think a topic is so important, great, then cover it yourself! We need all hands on deck, and I can only do so much.
This situation is a bit different because he is covering it and is disappointed that others aren’t doing so to his satisfaction as well, but like you said, he would probably get a lot more traction if he were willing to do interviews about it and focus on a more positive communication style than one that comes across as harassment and abuse.
P.S. Jessica, I just clicked on your bio at the bottom of this newsletter to make sure I was signed up for your newsletter as I didn’t remember seeing your posts for a while, and I discovered I am blocked! I assume this is an accident because we have never had any negative exchanges and indeed just reinforced one another’s messages on X regarding Stockholm syndrome and Mistakes Were NOT Made. As far as I know, we are very much on the same page about many matters. I have been experiencing a wide range of Big Tech attacks on my ability to communicate, with many readers reporting they were unsubbed from my mailing list without their awareness (https://substack.com/@margaretannaalice/note/c-92644006), for example, so I’m wondering if this is a new strategy being deployed, although I certainly hope not as it would be the first instance of such suppression occurring on Substack to my knowledge.
P.P.S. Jonathan, can you please make sure Jessica sees the P.S. above as she may not see it due to my being blocked? 😆
Hi Margaret. I know you and your work and I have no idea why you were blocked! I'm very direct and if I blocked you for a reason I would have no problem saying, "Yes, I blocked you, and here's why." Yes, we are on the same page about many things.
In any case, you are now unblocked. :)
I'm so sorry to hear about your personal losses and challenges. In the virtual world, it's easy to forget that those of us who are real people have real lives. As you've suggested, the more followers (X) and subscribers one has, the more requests/demands one can receive for promoting this topic or that one. I've had to use several strategies that people may not like for my own sanity and to make sure I am focusing on what I feel I'm best at and the 'original' contributions I can make. I take great pains to integrate others' work, as appropriate, and to cite/reference others when I am using their ideas - as I've done with the Scottish Inquiry coverage.
I appreciate your comments here and am hoping the best for all of us as people sort out priorities and figure out what 'next steps' look like for them. It's a time of transitions, mixed emotions, and unfinished business amidst elected/appointed/coronated officials who successfully pulled off a Global Human Rights Heist, and a populace that would like to move on and forget what occurred.
In the end, there are only ever a small-ish number of analysts who stick with the study of an event in the long term, and it's easy to see why.
Thank you, dear Jessica, for confirming the block was unintentional and for removing it! It is unnerving that something like that can happen without either of us knowing it. I realized I had no way to communicate with you through comments or even Substack Chat, so I’m grateful Jonathan was able to relay the message to you!
I applaud your ability to develop strategies to manage requests/demands and protect your sacred time, focus, and energy as that is an area where I have difficulty (too-nice syndrome 😆). I, too, try to focus on original contributions because there is no point in my expending energy on something other people are already covering when I have a million ideas of my own competing for my attention.
I also deeply appreciate your poignant words and wise insights regarding how easy it is to slip into dehumanizing those we only interact with online.
This actually relates to an essay I’ve been contemplating about a cognitive bias I’ve identified and haven’t seen articulated elsewhere. I think it is crucial to understand as I believe it accounts for many of the misunderstandings, misperceptions, miscommunications, and projections of ill intent we see in general but also especially within countercultural communities like the “freedom movement.”
I have been reading the mind-blowing research of Iain McGilchrist (“Ways of Attending: How our Divided Brain Constructs the World” and “The Master and His Emissary”). The revelations he shares regarding the left brain’s versus right brain’s ways of perceiving and interpreting the world help explain at the neurological level the patterns I have been observing at the behavioral level.
This is different from the simplistic left vs. right brain divisions that were long ago debunked because it is clear both hemispheres are involved in virtually every activity we undertake. What he noticed, however, is the left brain suffers from the Dunning–Kruger effect (he actually hasn’t used that term as far as I know; I just realized that’s exactly what he’s describing while I was distilling his hypothesis in this comment). The left hemisphere *thinks* it knows everything and tends to focus narrowly, whereas the right hemisphere is what’s capable of gluing all the pieces into a coherent, meaningful picture.
McGilchrist observes that societies tend to shift toward left-hemispheric thinking as they decline and become more totalitarian (again, I haven’t seen him use that word, but he has talked about governments in left-dominated societies “becom[ing] obsessed with issues of security above all else” and “seek[ing] total control”).
I think the following thought experiment from “Ways of Attending” summarizing what a world dominated by the left hemisphere would look like helps explain what you and Jonathan captured in this article:
“More narrowly focused attention would lead to an increasing specialisation and technicalising of knowledge.… Knowledge that has come through experience, and the practical acquisition of embodied skill, would become suspect, appearing either a threat or simply incomprehensible.…
“‘Either/or’ would tend to be substituted for matters of degree, and a certain inflexibility would result.… Resentment would lead to an emphasis on uniformity and equality, not as just one desirable to be balanced with others, but as the ultimate desirable, transcending all others. The left hemisphere cannot trust and is prone to paranoia. It needs to feel in control.…
“There would be a rise in intolerance and inflexibility, an unwillingness to change track or to change one’s mind.…
“There would be less tolerance for and appreciation of the value of ambiguity.”
Apologies for the lengthy comment, but once I get going on neuropsychology, it’s hard to stop myself—even though I have a deadline in a few hours and have yet to start on it 😆
Hi, I have just read your message…I’m sorry I didn’t earlier, I’ve been a bit more sporadic in my attention as I’m on holiday with my wife and 6 hours behind my normal UK time zone.
So saddened to read your post and everything you’ve been going through.
Wishing you all the best and yes I’ll bring your comment to Jessica’s attention.
So sorry to read your story about your husband Michael's passing. Heartbreaking. It must have taken a lot of courage to write that. Remember and make space and time for yourself and not devoted too much energy to the fight.
I respect you and your work a great deal, so your compassionate response means all the more to me.
The first few months, it was difficult for me to do anything besides grieving and coping with the onslaught of pragmatic demands required for sheer survival, including planning Michael’s service, reaching out to hundreds of connections spanning our nearly thirty-two–year marriage, and writing the eulogy (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/eulogy-for-the-patron-saint-of-insects).
I still feel bombarded on nearly every level and am often sideswiped by wailing sessions, but I find pouring myself into my mission and creative work has helped me progress beyond the most debilitating grief.
“You will survive. Your talent, imagination, and moral determination to make a difference in this world will give you the strength to endure and overcome.”
It is this sense of purpose and efficacy that propels me forward, and as Vera has also reminded me, this is what Michael would want me to do. My work is inextricably entwined with his own creative legacy. Cody Hudson’s reading of “Lament of the Vaxx-Injured” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/lament-of-the-vaxx-injured-video) features the last music composition he exported, and the video of Cody and Heather Hudson’s speeches (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/cody-and-heather-hudsons-speeches) is the last video he exported—less than twenty-four hours before his cardiac arrest.
I feel I am carrying on Michael’s work as I fulfill my own deepest calling, and doing so is an honor that helps me process the greatest tragedy of my life.
Thank you for the gift of your beautifully moving words, Elizabeth, as well as your significant contributions to our shared knowledge and efforts to save lives.
Interesting. There are many stacks I subscribe too that I have not heard from in quite some time. I need to check to see if I am blocked or have been unsubbed.
Thank you, Rosie. I actually do have DMSO but have been nervous about using it on him because of all the cautions I’ve read about it while studying its use for people (e.g., you have to clean the area thoroughly, and whatever you use has to be free of any substances you don’t want absorbed into the system (even natural soaps contain essential oils, for example, which are dangerous for kitties); you have to avoid any material touching the area for at least 20 minutes because it can absorb the dyes through the skin; and you shouldn’t be on any prescriptions (which he was initially for pain)). I have read three books on DMSO in addition to A Midwestern Doctor’s posts, and the more I learned about its powers, the more nervous I got about using it 😆
I take the view that it's a lot safer than anything else, and if we need to take that much care we'd never touch anything! Following the same logic from the opposite direction, after being a 'hand-washer' for several decades, I've curbed this obsession and only use tap water to the minimum practical.
But were you not impressed by the lengthy description of tests from A Midwestern Doctor that failed to show toxicity? I can't accept the concept that she's 'controlled opposition' any more than you or me.
No indeed, I've no actual knowledge about who A Midwestern Doctor is. It's just a habit I've fallen into, after reading a ‘feeling’ comment about the pain of childbirth. And I suppose an emotional need to feel as if I know the person. The consistency of the writing suggests to me that it is one person but I don't know that either of course. I also perceive his/her meticulous attention to detail and way of organising the material as a feminine trait, but likely enough that's my own bias and not general.
I can't see any evidence for the existence of viruses and plenty of alternative explanations for the conditions ascribed to viruses, but I don't let that bother me as regards A Midwestern Doctor's essays/reports.
I do appreciate that DMSO is remarkably safe in comparison with most pharmaceuticals. It’s just that its power to enable substances to permeate the skin and enhance their effects in the body means you have to take precautions to prevent toxins from entering your system while it’s active. I agree I’ve probably been overly cautious and should probably just try it ;-)
Personally I had a substantial mental block towards using it, but this melted when I started to chat to other people who follow A Midwestern Doctor. I was also helped by Amandha Vollmer's 'try it and see' approach.
In terms of toxins: we eat, drink, and breath toxins all the time (or toxic levels of essential substances even) as well as taking them in through the skin, both soluble substances and foreign bodies. The intake of toxins, broadly speaking, is greater than our body's abilities to eliminate them. This is where DMSO has an important role. Because it dissolves a wide range of things, and because it mobilises water in our bodies, it aids elimination of toxins. For example A Midwestern Doctor talks about muck being cleared out from the eyes.
My experience isn't one she's written about:
I'm a lifelong gardener and like to get muddy and mucky and am lazy about dealing with thorns and splinters....and for weeks a long succession of splinters and even dirt and specks of blood have been emerging from my fingers! So I'm guessing that an internal cleaning out process is going on as well. Except for emergency situations I always think one should make changes gradually. Clearly I don't want my body to mobilise toxins and foreign bodies from one place only to dump them in another. It seems as if you are worried on this point, and fair enough! Personally I turn to the extraordinary safety record and want the benefits, so I'm happy to take that chance. I'm over 60 after all, so I'm not bothered if I'm wrong. DMSO is certainly reversing some ageing traits.
Quite apart from the excellent, thought-provoking analysis from the two of you, I find your civil tone and open-mindedness very refreshing. Far too rare in social media.
"People’s state of knowledge about different parts of what is a complex situation is different and evolves at different rates and in different directions at different times..."
Succinctly and perfectly described.
I keep in mind that some started their voyage toward awareness in 2020, while others, myself included, alerted by the climatism scam had started to awaken in the mid-1990s.
Since then, it has been a nigh-on vertical learning curve with multiple intersectional trajectories, all equally vertical and many supra-national.
Reframing the entire context, intentions, extant and emerging constraints of our global prison without being accurately aware of the identity, explicit motivations and ideologies of our competing jailers is an extraordinary task of discovery and inference. It is intellectually and emotionally exhausting. Still, when in a war one fights until the end or until one wins. It is as simple, and the terms, as ruthless as that.
It strikes me that in all the knowledge we have collectively acquired we may eventually unveil with precision those explicitly evil, mortal, fallible, toilet paper dependent individuals, those abject well heeled megalomaniacs, who consider in their deluded hubris and psychopathy that they are supremely fit to rule the World and dispose of mankind and its prosperity as they see fit.
Then, in that time, we will have won and one prays, a new ontology emerges.
Meanwhile, doubtless we will continue to muddle along erratically. One holds to the adage that the enemy of my enemy is my friend.
This is an all too common reality. Many many many people do exactly as Dave does. I, myself, have repeatedly been told that I “don’t get it” because I am not screaming about the fraudulent use of PCR as a test, against lockdowns, or the lab leak theory, or that viruses do not even exist, or any one aspect of this, when in fact I may actually deal with some of these but not as “loudly” as I do on masks.
Just seems to be a part of the human experience, I guess.
That's not it for me. It's just the lack of concern and coverage of official testimony under oath almost like it's too simple for people looking for answers and insufficient so some other story needs to be spun to maintain follower interest. The freeodm space almsot becomes more about entertainment than facts.
Thanks for writing this article Jonathan and Jessica. Dave has also been harassing UKMFA on our Substack, to a degree which is starting to feel like we are being trolled. I have even considered blocking him as it is so negative and unhelpful. I tried engaging in constructive dialogue with him and invited him to speak about this important subject on our podcast - I pointed out to him that he is the expert on this and we would love to hear his observations and findings. And I invited him to the Scottish People’s Covid Inquiry last month organised by Richard Ennos where I was speaking and which was covering exactly the subject matter he is so exercised about “no-one covering”.
But he appears stuck in the drama triangle where he is the victim and we are the persecutors - so he is not prepared to help or support us (all volunteers and maxed out with the myriad of medical ethics issues we are currently fighting) to bring the subject of EoL Protocols and DNARs and care home deaths into our work. With unlimited resources we would definitely have given time to this serious ethical issue already - it is next on the “to do” list once current projects are completed.
I have compassion for him as it is devastating material to be viewing and covering day after day and he must be extremely traumatised by the stories he has heard. But attacking groups like us, HART and others is taking out his anger on the wrong people. I also wonder if his criticism of groups covering vaccine damage and ethics could be because he took the vaccine and has regret? Who knows, but the negativity and constant trolling is not going to achieve the results he wants, sadly. We all need to work together and support each other’s sincere efforts in the areas we are focussing on. No one can cover everything that was perpetrated on us in the name of Covid - there is simply too much. We are all doing our best with limited resources.
Where to start. I simply pointed out to you UKMFA as COVID critics have no articles on Scottish COVID inquiry testimony on your website for 18 months and i believe still don't. That's surely being helpful to your credentials? No open letters either to Scottish and even UK politicians citing the official evidence and care home abuses which call into question the nature of the pandemic itself. The evidence i post about SUPPORTS your concerns from 2020-21 and i implored you to take notice and that's NOT trying to be helpful?
'' I invited him to the Scottish People’s Covid Inquiry last month organised by Richard Ennos where I was speaking and which was covering exactly the subject matter he is so exercised about “no-one covering”.
This is where i feel like I am being trolled. eg-The event wouldn't have even happened if it wasn't for my coverage. Largley ignored, barely reposted by you and others for 18 months. So i'm then expected to buy a ticket for £25 to watch the footage i provided? It's not me that needs to know, it's other people that don't know what has been said. I'm not any sort of victim but i find it revealling you said because maybe don't like me, that then somehow invalidates what i post ABOUT? and so by blocking me you'd cut off a valuable source of truths you are not going to see anywhere else which are devastating to the COVID narrative you purport to be against, makes no sense. I have ''attacked'' no one, i have pointed out failures and inconosistencies vs Scottish inquiry evidence amonst the 'freedom' groups and popular personalities.
''I also wonder if his criticism of groups covering vaccine damage and ethics could be because he took the vaccine and has regret?'
-LOL I didn't take any COVID jabs. That's like another troll line to me.
''No one can cover everything that was perpetrated on us in the name of Covid - there is simply too much. We are all doing our best with limited resources.'
-This is what almost everyone says. eg-too many subjects. Therefore no focus on what would work best vs reaching ordinary people and that would be the Scottish evidence which has been largely ignored and would have been missed completely if i hadn't spent time on it. The world's only official COVID inquiry to reveal the horrors of lockdown. That's a big deal to dismiss for so long. Especially when someone has done 99% of the work for you.
I've also sent you many positive msgs willing to help if so required out without reply.
It seems to me to be the case with many of the dissidents that I can think of that they get frustrated when people don't take on their exact line of thinking. And they put forward the notion that unless everyone gets what they get then this will all happen again. It's a natural development in people who are working on something out of goodness and getting tired in so doing I think. It is easier to feel supported when you're named, but it's also essential to have anonymous commentators.
I guess for me Christine it's when you surveil the subjects critical people and 'alt media' DO spent time on discussing especially v COVID the Scottish evidence is barely on the radar and then i get accused of all sorts for simply pointing that out. The excuses then come rolling in about too many subjects etc etc Well it certainly ruffles some feathers and people should think why is that going on? People have more to say about me than what happened to elderly care home residents in 2020. Mad world.
The problem you all have is that you are trying to reveal a monster. And you have all discovered how grotesque the monster is. Every aspect of the monster is grotesque and worthy of attention and each of you has a specialty in knowing one part of the monster very well. But at the same time most people are never going to see it. This is appalling. But it's the truth. And it's not for us to lift the veil from people's eyes. Only you, as individuals in a group, can actually understand what the others see. And you should all be so valuable to one another for that reason.
If on the Scottish evidence (which has revealled the monster) we can't get people to see it then what is the point of all this? Personally i could delete my substack tomorrow and not lose any sleep because i know what i need to know and am confident i have done my best to let others also have the chance to know too but maybe it is time for me to move on. Kinda feel i've taken it all as far as i can anyway and i could do with more spare-time.
Well, you know we are commanded to speak the truth, even when people can't hear it. But we don't get to decide when people do hear it. God opens their ears and hearts and eyes, not us. You also know we are commanded not to cast pearls before swine. It's up to you to discern where the line is. With all love, Christine
Yours here is a wonderfully expressed ‘defense’ (if you two needed one), am hoping such Anons will come forth honorably with any further rejoinder - cheers.
I've become aware of that account. Not quite sure what their issue is. Seems to be doing a good job of covering the Scottish enquiry but lost me when went on the attack of other accounts. Pointless and divisive like many who want to make a name for themselves.
Goodness, thank you for the heads-up, currer, as well as the workaround. I am always grateful to be in Mike's company but would prefer a different venue from the censorship detention center ;-)
I commented on a post from Dr Mike Yeadon following his UK Column interview and Dave replied to that with something akin to "Look at all the things UK Column and the alternative media is not covering with regard to the Scottish COVID-19 inquiry".
Oh here we go again! Surreal. Valid criticism and opinions will not be tolerated in the 'freedom' community. Lord have mercy! Nothing i said to you on that thread was unreasonable. People don't need to agree with me but you should be able to hold civil debate.
Yes, I had noticed myself. I tend to think of much of this as plain war weariness. It has been a long haul since 2020. Nerves are frayed and people need a rest and maybe some humour.
I've yet to get an explanation of why my girl believed in the bullshit back then, even though she knows the truth now.
I'm not religious like you Jess, but I now understand the importance of confessing the truth before death.
If one cannot admit fault, one is still a slave to the lie.
Have you seen the show Battlestar Galactica? It's a masterpiece of the heart and the glory of love.
They also had a situation not unlike what happened in hospitals where frakkin doctors were killing patients and those that questioned them were deemed crazy.
Jonathan and Jessica, thank you so much for this piece, which is full of the candour and integrity that we are looking for in the society of the future. We cannot allow frustration to transform into bitterness towards those who are seeking the truth and a better world, but who necessarily do not share our own priorities. I salute 'Dave' for the fantastic work that he has done and continues to do. However I hope he can come to see that our cause is best served by actively praising those who have, and who continue to, put their heads above the parapet and broadcast as widely as possible their hard won insights. Only by integrating this knowledge, derived from a wide diversity of perspectives, will we be able to assemble a view of the world as it really is, and find the best solutions for our current predicament.
Thanks for your work, Dr Ennos, I remember your statistical research from early in the pandemic it was significant as it tracked the age groups with vaccine mortality as new and younger age groups qualified for "vaccination."
Many thanks for speaking out Prof.Ennos specifically focused on Scottish evidence. I am sure the inquiry and even UK COVID inquiry will have even more to tell us about the events from March 2020 but almost no one is watching due to widely promoted ''whitewash'' narratives despite my best intentions and passion to raise awareness that's not the whole story.
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newuk-covid-19-inquiry-28-oct-2024-8d6?utm_source=publication-search
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newuk-covid-19-inquiry-26-nov-2024-260?utm_source=publication-search
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newinquiry-whitewash-or-something?utm_source=publication-search
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newuk-covid-19-inquiry-4-nov-2024?utm_source=publication-search
NB; I have often thanked HART group and others for the times they have mentioned Scottish inquiry the past months i've just been flummoxed at the lack of attention past 18 months vs Scottish evidence or if someone does cover it it's forgotten about when it's ongoing. See comment- https://hartuk.substack.com/p/pick-of-the-week-12th-march-2025/comments
Yes, I've experienced the same negative response...
I went on one of his articles to leave supportive comments, but he appears antagonistic towards people challenging Covid from a vaccine perspective. https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newscottish-covid-19-inquiry21-may-176/comments
I've encountered the same attitude from some others, as if it's an 'either/or' proposition, rather than a scandal to be challenged from a number of angles.
It really is weird... With friends like these...
I just take the attitude to push on, and focus on the objective, try not to be pushed off track by negative people with questionable motives.
Have you seen this timeline. It tells the story in great detail:
Timeline to Covid Tyranny- Part One: Constructing the Biosecurity Empire (1999–2018)
https://healthfreedomdefense.org/timeline-to-covid-tyranny/
The great pandemic machine has been constructed, rehearsed and prepared for manufactured emergencies for years and the Covid™ circuit breaker got it up and running full speed ahead.
Part Two is coming up.
I think many are tired of this war, necessary as it is. Can make people tetchy.
I'm not here to make friends Elizabeth. My strong view is what happened in care homes and hospitals in 2020 deserves far more attention than the 'COVID vaccines.' I'm definetely not a negative person nor do i have 'questionable motives' that should be obvious.
biologyphenom, you say "My strong view is what happened in care homes and hospitals in 2020 deserves far more attention than the 'COVID vaccines.'"
That's your view, and of course it's important to bring attention to what happened in 'care' homes.
Meanwhile, I contend it is vital to seek accountability for coercive and mandatory medical interventions, i.e. the COVID-19 injections. This builds on the work I've been doing for more than 16 years investigating taxpayer-funded vaccination policy and practice, particularly coercive vaccination in Australia, e.g. where children are prey to more and more vaccine products - facilitated by the No Jab, No Pay/No Pay laws set in place from 2016.
These laws morphed into 'No Jab, No Job' to 'No Jab, No Life' edicts during 'Covid' times in Australia.
This may be of little or no significance to you biologyphenom, perhaps you weren't subjected to vaccine mandates that threatened your livelihood and participation in society.
This isn't an 'either/or' proposition - why do you denigrate other people's efforts? People who are motivated to get off their backsides and actually do something, it's their choice where to spend their time. The very odd situation is being maligned and sabotaged by people one might think would be onside...
In regard to your situation, you complain about everyone else from behind your pseudonym, and reject offers to share your point of view - e.g. you knocked back UKFMA and Ahmad Malik's offers to participate in their podcasts.
Instead of attacking other people who are doing their best to try and address a very big complicated picture, why don't you direct your ire to those 'in authority' who are actually accountable for the dire situation in care homes and elsewhere?
Thank you for writing this as I have been subjected to similar bullying, fallacious accusations, and abuse by this user, which is really a shame because he is only doing the Scottish Inquiry a disservice by behaving in such an off-putting and hateful manner.
Just as you’ve articulated so elegantly here, failure to cover a person’s favored topic does not indicate a lack of interest in or valuing of that subject but simply the constraints of the space-time continuum and the necessity to focus on our own particular passions as a matter of survival. I literally (and I mean this literally, not figuratively) have thousands of unfinished projects and research topic folders as well as hundreds of thousands of articles, videos, and other references saved for future examination, including the Scottish Inquiry. I have one article on vaxx injuries, for example, that I’ve been trying to finish since fall 2021 with more than 2,000 links to evaluate associated with that article alone.
Not to mention the small matter of losing my husband tragically suddenly last July (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/ive-lost-half-of-me-pitched-past); my mom being diagnosed with a life-threatening lung condition several months ago (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/my-year-of-stoic-challenges and https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/a-christmas-miracle-my-moms-medical); and a confluence of kitty crises I am currently dealing with, including one kitty who severely injured his knee and required surgery last week.
This phenomenon (no pun intended ;-) extends beyond this particular user, however. I have lost count of the number of people who have badgered me about covering their pet topic. There are thousands of subjects I am interested in and agree are important to address, but I am only one human, and even working 29-hour days as I have been lately, it is still impossible for me to complete everything on my todo list let alone theirs. What I often tell these people is that if they think a topic is so important, great, then cover it yourself! We need all hands on deck, and I can only do so much.
This situation is a bit different because he is covering it and is disappointed that others aren’t doing so to his satisfaction as well, but like you said, he would probably get a lot more traction if he were willing to do interviews about it and focus on a more positive communication style than one that comes across as harassment and abuse.
P.S. Jessica, I just clicked on your bio at the bottom of this newsletter to make sure I was signed up for your newsletter as I didn’t remember seeing your posts for a while, and I discovered I am blocked! I assume this is an accident because we have never had any negative exchanges and indeed just reinforced one another’s messages on X regarding Stockholm syndrome and Mistakes Were NOT Made. As far as I know, we are very much on the same page about many matters. I have been experiencing a wide range of Big Tech attacks on my ability to communicate, with many readers reporting they were unsubbed from my mailing list without their awareness (https://substack.com/@margaretannaalice/note/c-92644006), for example, so I’m wondering if this is a new strategy being deployed, although I certainly hope not as it would be the first instance of such suppression occurring on Substack to my knowledge.
P.P.S. Jonathan, can you please make sure Jessica sees the P.S. above as she may not see it due to my being blocked? 😆
Hi Margaret. I know you and your work and I have no idea why you were blocked! I'm very direct and if I blocked you for a reason I would have no problem saying, "Yes, I blocked you, and here's why." Yes, we are on the same page about many things.
In any case, you are now unblocked. :)
I'm so sorry to hear about your personal losses and challenges. In the virtual world, it's easy to forget that those of us who are real people have real lives. As you've suggested, the more followers (X) and subscribers one has, the more requests/demands one can receive for promoting this topic or that one. I've had to use several strategies that people may not like for my own sanity and to make sure I am focusing on what I feel I'm best at and the 'original' contributions I can make. I take great pains to integrate others' work, as appropriate, and to cite/reference others when I am using their ideas - as I've done with the Scottish Inquiry coverage.
I appreciate your comments here and am hoping the best for all of us as people sort out priorities and figure out what 'next steps' look like for them. It's a time of transitions, mixed emotions, and unfinished business amidst elected/appointed/coronated officials who successfully pulled off a Global Human Rights Heist, and a populace that would like to move on and forget what occurred.
In the end, there are only ever a small-ish number of analysts who stick with the study of an event in the long term, and it's easy to see why.
Mistakes were NOT made. There was no pandemic.
Thank you, dear Jessica, for confirming the block was unintentional and for removing it! It is unnerving that something like that can happen without either of us knowing it. I realized I had no way to communicate with you through comments or even Substack Chat, so I’m grateful Jonathan was able to relay the message to you!
I applaud your ability to develop strategies to manage requests/demands and protect your sacred time, focus, and energy as that is an area where I have difficulty (too-nice syndrome 😆). I, too, try to focus on original contributions because there is no point in my expending energy on something other people are already covering when I have a million ideas of my own competing for my attention.
I also deeply appreciate your poignant words and wise insights regarding how easy it is to slip into dehumanizing those we only interact with online.
This actually relates to an essay I’ve been contemplating about a cognitive bias I’ve identified and haven’t seen articulated elsewhere. I think it is crucial to understand as I believe it accounts for many of the misunderstandings, misperceptions, miscommunications, and projections of ill intent we see in general but also especially within countercultural communities like the “freedom movement.”
I have been reading the mind-blowing research of Iain McGilchrist (“Ways of Attending: How our Divided Brain Constructs the World” and “The Master and His Emissary”). The revelations he shares regarding the left brain’s versus right brain’s ways of perceiving and interpreting the world help explain at the neurological level the patterns I have been observing at the behavioral level.
This is different from the simplistic left vs. right brain divisions that were long ago debunked because it is clear both hemispheres are involved in virtually every activity we undertake. What he noticed, however, is the left brain suffers from the Dunning–Kruger effect (he actually hasn’t used that term as far as I know; I just realized that’s exactly what he’s describing while I was distilling his hypothesis in this comment). The left hemisphere *thinks* it knows everything and tends to focus narrowly, whereas the right hemisphere is what’s capable of gluing all the pieces into a coherent, meaningful picture.
McGilchrist observes that societies tend to shift toward left-hemispheric thinking as they decline and become more totalitarian (again, I haven’t seen him use that word, but he has talked about governments in left-dominated societies “becom[ing] obsessed with issues of security above all else” and “seek[ing] total control”).
I think the following thought experiment from “Ways of Attending” summarizing what a world dominated by the left hemisphere would look like helps explain what you and Jonathan captured in this article:
“More narrowly focused attention would lead to an increasing specialisation and technicalising of knowledge.… Knowledge that has come through experience, and the practical acquisition of embodied skill, would become suspect, appearing either a threat or simply incomprehensible.…
“‘Either/or’ would tend to be substituted for matters of degree, and a certain inflexibility would result.… Resentment would lead to an emphasis on uniformity and equality, not as just one desirable to be balanced with others, but as the ultimate desirable, transcending all others. The left hemisphere cannot trust and is prone to paranoia. It needs to feel in control.…
“There would be a rise in intolerance and inflexibility, an unwillingness to change track or to change one’s mind.…
“There would be less tolerance for and appreciation of the value of ambiguity.”
Apologies for the lengthy comment, but once I get going on neuropsychology, it’s hard to stop myself—even though I have a deadline in a few hours and have yet to start on it 😆
Hi, I have just read your message…I’m sorry I didn’t earlier, I’ve been a bit more sporadic in my attention as I’m on holiday with my wife and 6 hours behind my normal UK time zone.
So saddened to read your post and everything you’ve been going through.
Wishing you all the best and yes I’ll bring your comment to Jessica’s attention.
Thank you so much for confirming you saw my comments, Jonathan, as well as for alerting Jessica and especially for your empathetic words.
It does appear the block was unintentional, which is a relief but also concerning and I hope not indicative of a more widespread technical “glitch.”
So sorry to read your story about your husband Michael's passing. Heartbreaking. It must have taken a lot of courage to write that. Remember and make space and time for yourself and not devoted too much energy to the fight.
I am sobbing as I read your words, Martin 😭💔
I respect you and your work a great deal, so your compassionate response means all the more to me.
The first few months, it was difficult for me to do anything besides grieving and coping with the onslaught of pragmatic demands required for sheer survival, including planning Michael’s service, reaching out to hundreds of connections spanning our nearly thirty-two–year marriage, and writing the eulogy (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/eulogy-for-the-patron-saint-of-insects).
I still feel bombarded on nearly every level and am often sideswiped by wailing sessions, but I find pouring myself into my mission and creative work has helped me progress beyond the most debilitating grief.
As I shared in the post featuring Vera Sharav’s reading of “Mistakes Were NOT Made” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/mistakes-were-not-made-video-vera), Vera wrote me:
“You will survive. Your talent, imagination, and moral determination to make a difference in this world will give you the strength to endure and overcome.”
It is this sense of purpose and efficacy that propels me forward, and as Vera has also reminded me, this is what Michael would want me to do. My work is inextricably entwined with his own creative legacy. Cody Hudson’s reading of “Lament of the Vaxx-Injured” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/lament-of-the-vaxx-injured-video) features the last music composition he exported, and the video of Cody and Heather Hudson’s speeches (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/cody-and-heather-hudsons-speeches) is the last video he exported—less than twenty-four hours before his cardiac arrest.
I feel I am carrying on Michael’s work as I fulfill my own deepest calling, and doing so is an honor that helps me process the greatest tragedy of my life.
Dear Margaret Anna Alice, so sorry for the loss of your dear husband Michael.
May carrying on your calling give you comfort.
Take it easy, and guidance will come for what you need to do.
Thank you for the gift of your beautifully moving words, Elizabeth, as well as your significant contributions to our shared knowledge and efforts to save lives.
Interesting. There are many stacks I subscribe too that I have not heard from in quite some time. I need to check to see if I am blocked or have been unsubbed.
Have you got DMSO for your kitty's injury?
Thank you, Rosie. I actually do have DMSO but have been nervous about using it on him because of all the cautions I’ve read about it while studying its use for people (e.g., you have to clean the area thoroughly, and whatever you use has to be free of any substances you don’t want absorbed into the system (even natural soaps contain essential oils, for example, which are dangerous for kitties); you have to avoid any material touching the area for at least 20 minutes because it can absorb the dyes through the skin; and you shouldn’t be on any prescriptions (which he was initially for pain)). I have read three books on DMSO in addition to A Midwestern Doctor’s posts, and the more I learned about its powers, the more nervous I got about using it 😆
I take the view that it's a lot safer than anything else, and if we need to take that much care we'd never touch anything! Following the same logic from the opposite direction, after being a 'hand-washer' for several decades, I've curbed this obsession and only use tap water to the minimum practical.
But were you not impressed by the lengthy description of tests from A Midwestern Doctor that failed to show toxicity? I can't accept the concept that she's 'controlled opposition' any more than you or me.
Off topic, do say if that's not OK.
Has MWD disclosed being female - or (for that matter) only one person?
No indeed, I've no actual knowledge about who A Midwestern Doctor is. It's just a habit I've fallen into, after reading a ‘feeling’ comment about the pain of childbirth. And I suppose an emotional need to feel as if I know the person. The consistency of the writing suggests to me that it is one person but I don't know that either of course. I also perceive his/her meticulous attention to detail and way of organising the material as a feminine trait, but likely enough that's my own bias and not general.
I can't see any evidence for the existence of viruses and plenty of alternative explanations for the conditions ascribed to viruses, but I don't let that bother me as regards A Midwestern Doctor's essays/reports.
Also replying to @Jonathan's question.
Out of interest, what’s the basis for your implied assumption that MWD is female?
I do appreciate that DMSO is remarkably safe in comparison with most pharmaceuticals. It’s just that its power to enable substances to permeate the skin and enhance their effects in the body means you have to take precautions to prevent toxins from entering your system while it’s active. I agree I’ve probably been overly cautious and should probably just try it ;-)
Personally I had a substantial mental block towards using it, but this melted when I started to chat to other people who follow A Midwestern Doctor. I was also helped by Amandha Vollmer's 'try it and see' approach.
In terms of toxins: we eat, drink, and breath toxins all the time (or toxic levels of essential substances even) as well as taking them in through the skin, both soluble substances and foreign bodies. The intake of toxins, broadly speaking, is greater than our body's abilities to eliminate them. This is where DMSO has an important role. Because it dissolves a wide range of things, and because it mobilises water in our bodies, it aids elimination of toxins. For example A Midwestern Doctor talks about muck being cleared out from the eyes.
My experience isn't one she's written about:
I'm a lifelong gardener and like to get muddy and mucky and am lazy about dealing with thorns and splinters....and for weeks a long succession of splinters and even dirt and specks of blood have been emerging from my fingers! So I'm guessing that an internal cleaning out process is going on as well. Except for emergency situations I always think one should make changes gradually. Clearly I don't want my body to mobilise toxins and foreign bodies from one place only to dump them in another. It seems as if you are worried on this point, and fair enough! Personally I turn to the extraordinary safety record and want the benefits, so I'm happy to take that chance. I'm over 60 after all, so I'm not bothered if I'm wrong. DMSO is certainly reversing some ageing traits.
Quite apart from the excellent, thought-provoking analysis from the two of you, I find your civil tone and open-mindedness very refreshing. Far too rare in social media.
"People’s state of knowledge about different parts of what is a complex situation is different and evolves at different rates and in different directions at different times..."
Succinctly and perfectly described.
I keep in mind that some started their voyage toward awareness in 2020, while others, myself included, alerted by the climatism scam had started to awaken in the mid-1990s.
Since then, it has been a nigh-on vertical learning curve with multiple intersectional trajectories, all equally vertical and many supra-national.
Reframing the entire context, intentions, extant and emerging constraints of our global prison without being accurately aware of the identity, explicit motivations and ideologies of our competing jailers is an extraordinary task of discovery and inference. It is intellectually and emotionally exhausting. Still, when in a war one fights until the end or until one wins. It is as simple, and the terms, as ruthless as that.
It strikes me that in all the knowledge we have collectively acquired we may eventually unveil with precision those explicitly evil, mortal, fallible, toilet paper dependent individuals, those abject well heeled megalomaniacs, who consider in their deluded hubris and psychopathy that they are supremely fit to rule the World and dispose of mankind and its prosperity as they see fit.
Then, in that time, we will have won and one prays, a new ontology emerges.
Meanwhile, doubtless we will continue to muddle along erratically. One holds to the adage that the enemy of my enemy is my friend.
This is an all too common reality. Many many many people do exactly as Dave does. I, myself, have repeatedly been told that I “don’t get it” because I am not screaming about the fraudulent use of PCR as a test, against lockdowns, or the lab leak theory, or that viruses do not even exist, or any one aspect of this, when in fact I may actually deal with some of these but not as “loudly” as I do on masks.
Just seems to be a part of the human experience, I guess.
An army in war has many parts; infantry, tanks, artillery, logistics, communications etc. Everyone plays their part to the best of their ability.
That's the theory anyway. The best laid plans fall apart in contact with the enemy when sheer guts and individual initiative take over.
That's not it for me. It's just the lack of concern and coverage of official testimony under oath almost like it's too simple for people looking for answers and insufficient so some other story needs to be spun to maintain follower interest. The freeodm space almsot becomes more about entertainment than facts.
Thanks for writing this article Jonathan and Jessica. Dave has also been harassing UKMFA on our Substack, to a degree which is starting to feel like we are being trolled. I have even considered blocking him as it is so negative and unhelpful. I tried engaging in constructive dialogue with him and invited him to speak about this important subject on our podcast - I pointed out to him that he is the expert on this and we would love to hear his observations and findings. And I invited him to the Scottish People’s Covid Inquiry last month organised by Richard Ennos where I was speaking and which was covering exactly the subject matter he is so exercised about “no-one covering”.
But he appears stuck in the drama triangle where he is the victim and we are the persecutors - so he is not prepared to help or support us (all volunteers and maxed out with the myriad of medical ethics issues we are currently fighting) to bring the subject of EoL Protocols and DNARs and care home deaths into our work. With unlimited resources we would definitely have given time to this serious ethical issue already - it is next on the “to do” list once current projects are completed.
I have compassion for him as it is devastating material to be viewing and covering day after day and he must be extremely traumatised by the stories he has heard. But attacking groups like us, HART and others is taking out his anger on the wrong people. I also wonder if his criticism of groups covering vaccine damage and ethics could be because he took the vaccine and has regret? Who knows, but the negativity and constant trolling is not going to achieve the results he wants, sadly. We all need to work together and support each other’s sincere efforts in the areas we are focussing on. No one can cover everything that was perpetrated on us in the name of Covid - there is simply too much. We are all doing our best with limited resources.
Where to start. I simply pointed out to you UKMFA as COVID critics have no articles on Scottish COVID inquiry testimony on your website for 18 months and i believe still don't. That's surely being helpful to your credentials? No open letters either to Scottish and even UK politicians citing the official evidence and care home abuses which call into question the nature of the pandemic itself. The evidence i post about SUPPORTS your concerns from 2020-21 and i implored you to take notice and that's NOT trying to be helpful?
'' I invited him to the Scottish People’s Covid Inquiry last month organised by Richard Ennos where I was speaking and which was covering exactly the subject matter he is so exercised about “no-one covering”.
This is where i feel like I am being trolled. eg-The event wouldn't have even happened if it wasn't for my coverage. Largley ignored, barely reposted by you and others for 18 months. So i'm then expected to buy a ticket for £25 to watch the footage i provided? It's not me that needs to know, it's other people that don't know what has been said. I'm not any sort of victim but i find it revealling you said because maybe don't like me, that then somehow invalidates what i post ABOUT? and so by blocking me you'd cut off a valuable source of truths you are not going to see anywhere else which are devastating to the COVID narrative you purport to be against, makes no sense. I have ''attacked'' no one, i have pointed out failures and inconosistencies vs Scottish inquiry evidence amonst the 'freedom' groups and popular personalities.
''I also wonder if his criticism of groups covering vaccine damage and ethics could be because he took the vaccine and has regret?'
-LOL I didn't take any COVID jabs. That's like another troll line to me.
''No one can cover everything that was perpetrated on us in the name of Covid - there is simply too much. We are all doing our best with limited resources.'
-This is what almost everyone says. eg-too many subjects. Therefore no focus on what would work best vs reaching ordinary people and that would be the Scottish evidence which has been largely ignored and would have been missed completely if i hadn't spent time on it. The world's only official COVID inquiry to reveal the horrors of lockdown. That's a big deal to dismiss for so long. Especially when someone has done 99% of the work for you.
I've also sent you many positive msgs willing to help if so required out without reply.
It seems to me to be the case with many of the dissidents that I can think of that they get frustrated when people don't take on their exact line of thinking. And they put forward the notion that unless everyone gets what they get then this will all happen again. It's a natural development in people who are working on something out of goodness and getting tired in so doing I think. It is easier to feel supported when you're named, but it's also essential to have anonymous commentators.
I guess for me Christine it's when you surveil the subjects critical people and 'alt media' DO spent time on discussing especially v COVID the Scottish evidence is barely on the radar and then i get accused of all sorts for simply pointing that out. The excuses then come rolling in about too many subjects etc etc Well it certainly ruffles some feathers and people should think why is that going on? People have more to say about me than what happened to elderly care home residents in 2020. Mad world.
The problem you all have is that you are trying to reveal a monster. And you have all discovered how grotesque the monster is. Every aspect of the monster is grotesque and worthy of attention and each of you has a specialty in knowing one part of the monster very well. But at the same time most people are never going to see it. This is appalling. But it's the truth. And it's not for us to lift the veil from people's eyes. Only you, as individuals in a group, can actually understand what the others see. And you should all be so valuable to one another for that reason.
If on the Scottish evidence (which has revealled the monster) we can't get people to see it then what is the point of all this? Personally i could delete my substack tomorrow and not lose any sleep because i know what i need to know and am confident i have done my best to let others also have the chance to know too but maybe it is time for me to move on. Kinda feel i've taken it all as far as i can anyway and i could do with more spare-time.
Well, you know we are commanded to speak the truth, even when people can't hear it. But we don't get to decide when people do hear it. God opens their ears and hearts and eyes, not us. You also know we are commanded not to cast pearls before swine. It's up to you to discern where the line is. With all love, Christine
My humble take on all of this for what it is worth:
I see through the channels that there are many people in the ‘resistance’ doing excellent work
according to their own personal interests, aptitudes and motivations
this is natural and provides a needed diversity of analysis and insights
into what is a very complex societal problem requiring a multi disciplinary approach
and I would like to think that there is one thing which unites us & which we can all agree upon
that we wholeheartedly oppose a system which wants to impose a single view
about every event which happens in the world
at pain of severe penalties for daring to challenge this version of the truth
of course there is ‘controlled opposition’ to be careful about
but when taken to extremes this becomes self destructive to our movement
it causes us to fractionate into different camps
this has already happened with the virus - no virus question
and the necessary resolution of just this one question needs time
plus respect for the views of others and a process of civil discourse
this requires understanding & diplomacy otherwise it can and will lead to open war
which is simply a mirror image of the real enemy and what they would like to see
so let us not go down that road because it is a dead end
let us celebrate and not denigrate the diversity we have
and respect the other person’s right and interest to tackle the problem
according to their own interests, motivations and beliefs
and occasionally stop, to pat ourselves on the back
for our contributions, however great or small, to such a diverse & talented resistance movement
which is the exact opposite of the M O of the enemy we are up against
long live the resistance!
Yours here is a wonderfully expressed ‘defense’ (if you two needed one), am hoping such Anons will come forth honorably with any further rejoinder - cheers.
I've become aware of that account. Not quite sure what their issue is. Seems to be doing a good job of covering the Scottish enquiry but lost me when went on the attack of other accounts. Pointless and divisive like many who want to make a name for themselves.
@Jessica and @Jonathan. Are you able to see the reply from Margaret Anna Alice? She seems to have been blocked unfortunately.
Thank you, Rosie. It is quite disconcerting as I can see no reason why this may have occurred and don't even know if they can see my comments.
I can and just replied below.
Mike Yeadon's comments are being blocked on substack too, which sometimes eliminates a whole chain of discussion and response.
I know Mike is being widely censored online, but for some reason assumed that substack was immune to this.
Using a minority browser/search engine restores the invisible blocked discussions and comments.
It's probably the cunty writers that are blocking him.
Cowards resort to censorship.
Got morons still ignoring the clear logic of Mike and others.
Pierre Kory, Midwestern doctor, etc....
https://www.wikispooks.com/wiki/Limited_hangout
Even if they're not willingly this, they're complicit.
Goodness, thank you for the heads-up, currer, as well as the workaround. I am always grateful to be in Mike's company but would prefer a different venue from the censorship detention center ;-)
We have to all bear in mind that substack and our comments here are being monitored.
I commented on a post from Dr Mike Yeadon following his UK Column interview and Dave replied to that with something akin to "Look at all the things UK Column and the alternative media is not covering with regard to the Scottish COVID-19 inquiry".
Exactly, what's wrong with pointing that out? It's the truth. eg-We are 8 months on from the following and no msm or alt media reports on it. This is a pretty big deal in my eyes. https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiryclosing
I appear to be getting a similar treatment by the same anonymous account:
https://substack.com/@scottishcovidinquiry/note/c-100544100?utm_source=notes-share-action&r=yylj
Oh here we go again! Surreal. Valid criticism and opinions will not be tolerated in the 'freedom' community. Lord have mercy! Nothing i said to you on that thread was unreasonable. People don't need to agree with me but you should be able to hold civil debate.
Yes, I had noticed myself. I tend to think of much of this as plain war weariness. It has been a long haul since 2020. Nerves are frayed and people need a rest and maybe some humour.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/why-does-the-word-humour-have-a-u?utm_source=publication-search
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/friday-foolishness-why-was-beijing?utm_source=publication-search
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/do-dryer-balls-work-a-light-bite?utm_source=publication-search
Tons of frakkin morons out there.
I've yet to get an explanation of why my girl believed in the bullshit back then, even though she knows the truth now.
I'm not religious like you Jess, but I now understand the importance of confessing the truth before death.
If one cannot admit fault, one is still a slave to the lie.
Have you seen the show Battlestar Galactica? It's a masterpiece of the heart and the glory of love.
They also had a situation not unlike what happened in hospitals where frakkin doctors were killing patients and those that questioned them were deemed crazy.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=SifiB2zgbvM