Thanks for alert. If Parliament vote for this evil charter tomorrow, I will make it the day I decided never to return to the UK. Thanks to Nikki da Costa for the summary of main points.
Those who are selected for their appearance of wisdom and compassion to serve their nation, our political representatives at the highest level, betray their promise and contract.
They chose to betray. There is always a Judas and their fate awaits.
What a horror.
Thank you for this information and for your honest and caring informant.
I wrote to my MP a couple of months ago ,via email, asking her to reconsider her stance over this immoral dangerous bill dressed up as compassion for the dying. Nothing nada in response. I saw that one of Leadbeater articles was supported by the Fabian society, is that a clue ? Ester Rantzen who campaigned strongly for this bill is still alive nearly 3 years later ,does she not now have any concerns?
My view on assistance in dying is that the act of having at least as much compassion for people as we do for our pets should be decriminalized. I don't see anything morally wrong with making human deaths, once they're imminent, as peaceful and as painless as possible. Morally, to set the terms of one's life includes the right to set the terms of one's death, or at least to designate those terms, assuming it's at all possible to follow someone's end-of-life instructions.
Politicians--narcissistic psychopaths almost by definition--and their adjuncts are the last people who should be setting standards for euthanasia. The UK's assisted dying bill is proof that they're a menace and absolutely unfit to even be part of the conversation. They should be forbidden to have anything to do with the topic. Death is as intimately personal a decision as those of one's life--or should be, if humanity could get over this non-stop collectivization of everything. Ideally the "medical professionals" who recently outed themselves as sadistic sociopaths should be excluded from the discussion, too. Private groups that currently exist seem to spend a lot of time trying to get laws changed and bills passed; i.e., they're enmeshing the government inextricably in something it has no business even taking notice of. But if euthanasia were decriminalized and 100% privatized, those same groups could spend their energy setting their own standards instead of lobbying politicians. They could then list doctors who were willing to work within a given group's standards, and people could designate the group whose standards and protocols they wanted to have applied to them. Most would probably have a range of options people could designate.
I know someone whose best friend committed suicide. He waited until his caregiver left on an errand, then shot himself in the head. I don't know how anyone can contemplate the caregiver finding him, and his friends' mental anguish when they learned of his desperation, and think that that's in any way better than the ability to plan a quiet, humane, peaceful death.
Thanks. Of course, I am sure you realise that it's perfectly possible to both agree with your sentiments AND oppose this specific abomination of a proposed act of parliament.
Euthanasia being decriminalized gets us to accepting murder as acceptable. It is all about profit in any way it can be made, whilst reducing the 'surplus' population. As evil and the love of money lurks in the hearts of mankind is unrealistic to think of 'standards' in death dealing.
So many have been driven to despair by the very people who seek to profit from such despair. The COVID 19 farce showed us that if we weren't aware before.
Thanks for alert. If Parliament vote for this evil charter tomorrow, I will make it the day I decided never to return to the UK. Thanks to Nikki da Costa for the summary of main points.
Replying to my own reply - 314/291. Close but not enough. So 6/20/25 is the point of no return. How can 314 Parliamentarians be so stupid?
Those who are selected for their appearance of wisdom and compassion to serve their nation, our political representatives at the highest level, betray their promise and contract.
They chose to betray. There is always a Judas and their fate awaits.
What a horror.
Thank you for this information and for your honest and caring informant.
I too avoid the land of my birth.
I wrote to my MP a couple of months ago ,via email, asking her to reconsider her stance over this immoral dangerous bill dressed up as compassion for the dying. Nothing nada in response. I saw that one of Leadbeater articles was supported by the Fabian society, is that a clue ? Ester Rantzen who campaigned strongly for this bill is still alive nearly 3 years later ,does she not now have any concerns?
Many thanks Jonathan. It is an evil, diabolical bill indeed dressed up as compassion. State sanctioned murder for profit as always.
I did my own post back in November last year. I went to meeting with my MP who seems to be against it thankfully.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/assisted-dying-bill-and-kim-leadbeater?utm_source=publication-search
It may seem bizarre but 'eek me a death bill crime' is an anagram of Kim Michele Leadbeater, her full name.
While I am at it I will attach this link too. State sanctioned murder is being pushed at both ends of life.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/tonia-antoniazzi-diana-johnson-and?utm_source=publication-search
I do consider that at the bottom of it all is profit as much as it is eugenics.
My view on assistance in dying is that the act of having at least as much compassion for people as we do for our pets should be decriminalized. I don't see anything morally wrong with making human deaths, once they're imminent, as peaceful and as painless as possible. Morally, to set the terms of one's life includes the right to set the terms of one's death, or at least to designate those terms, assuming it's at all possible to follow someone's end-of-life instructions.
Politicians--narcissistic psychopaths almost by definition--and their adjuncts are the last people who should be setting standards for euthanasia. The UK's assisted dying bill is proof that they're a menace and absolutely unfit to even be part of the conversation. They should be forbidden to have anything to do with the topic. Death is as intimately personal a decision as those of one's life--or should be, if humanity could get over this non-stop collectivization of everything. Ideally the "medical professionals" who recently outed themselves as sadistic sociopaths should be excluded from the discussion, too. Private groups that currently exist seem to spend a lot of time trying to get laws changed and bills passed; i.e., they're enmeshing the government inextricably in something it has no business even taking notice of. But if euthanasia were decriminalized and 100% privatized, those same groups could spend their energy setting their own standards instead of lobbying politicians. They could then list doctors who were willing to work within a given group's standards, and people could designate the group whose standards and protocols they wanted to have applied to them. Most would probably have a range of options people could designate.
I know someone whose best friend committed suicide. He waited until his caregiver left on an errand, then shot himself in the head. I don't know how anyone can contemplate the caregiver finding him, and his friends' mental anguish when they learned of his desperation, and think that that's in any way better than the ability to plan a quiet, humane, peaceful death.
Thanks. Of course, I am sure you realise that it's perfectly possible to both agree with your sentiments AND oppose this specific abomination of a proposed act of parliament.
Euthanasia being decriminalized gets us to accepting murder as acceptable. It is all about profit in any way it can be made, whilst reducing the 'surplus' population. As evil and the love of money lurks in the hearts of mankind is unrealistic to think of 'standards' in death dealing.
So many have been driven to despair by the very people who seek to profit from such despair. The COVID 19 farce showed us that if we weren't aware before.
Well, their intentions MUST be very good, right?
Avoid all potential ideas of suffering at the beginnings of life and, well, all through out life.
Boy we have the perfect drug for you !!
100 years from now, all new people, but this is not a great path we are on.
Depopulation agenda in plain sight!