"How did this supposed virus race around the world at lightning speed, travel over 5,000 miles from Wuhan to Lombardy, yet bypass regions in Italy (to the west and the east) which were only a short distance from Lombardy?
Central and Southern Italy do not seem to be impacted in any meaningful way by any alleged viral pathogen.
Even as the ages and pre-existing pathologies of COVID-attributed deaths are important bits of evidence which refute certain aspects of the “deadly coronavirus” story, the most incriminating pieces of evidence are the geographical anomalies observed in the data above.
How is it that massive clusters of alleged COVID deaths are situated alongside neighboring locales which experienced so few COVID deaths?
What was it about Italy’s autonomous regions that protected them from the ravages of this purported pathogen?
None of this makes sense. If this heavily advertised virus was as transmissible and deadly as the world was told the data wouldn’t look like this. Of the many contentious issues surrounding viruses, what’s not up for debate is that viruses are not subject to borders or geographical boundaries."
But the vid is super intelligent. It knows to stay away when you sit at your table in a restaurant and are eating, but it will for sure kill you if you don't have a mask on when you go to order or use the restroom.
"European Commissioner for the Economy, Paolo Gentiloni, said: “The Investment Plan for Europe has a strong track record in supporting innovative biotech companies researching new therapies for serious diseases. The EIB’s €50 million in financing will allow BioNTech to take on more highly-specialized staff and push forward the research and development of treatments that could prove to be life-saving.”"
European Investment Bank provides funding of €50 million to BioNTech as part of the Investment Plan for Europe
Very important. BioNTech gets first line of funding from EIB at the same time as Rizzi is being appointed and before anyone has ever heard about a "novel virus" in Wuhan, i.e. RIGHT before we hear about it. It will get a second tranche of funding from the EIB a few months later: this time explicitly connected to "Covid vaccine" development. Who is the president of the EIB at this time? The former German Foreign Office official Werner Hoyer. You can see him with Sahin, the CEO of BioNTech, and Ursula von der Leyen here: https://brownstone.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Screen-Shot-2023-12-24-at-12.44.33-PM.png. He's the man with the yellow scarf.
BTW, looking again at that passage from Sahin’s book, there is one more oddity worth noting. This is supposedly Rizzi jr receiving the go-ahead for a clinical trial from the German regulator, the PEI. But, as we can see from his LinkedIn page, Ruben Rizzi does not even speak German. There is no way that an official agency of the German government is going to be sending an official communication to a German firm in English (much less Italian!). Like so many other aspects of Sahin’s book, this is fiction. Rizzi was not appointed to serve as liaison with the German regulator. So, why was he appointed?
Another interesting coincidence “Ruben joined BioNTech in December 2019 to provide regulatory support to its growing oncology pipeline.”
The cancer business is booming, who would have known that injecting chemical poisons directly into an organism would result in a cancer explosion. Quick let’s get a cancer vaccine ready as the “science” has already proven the causative agent is another pesky modeled virus called SV40. All connected. No coincidences.
It seems to me this is less a coincidence and more a cover story to provide plausible deniability. BioNTech was always a cancer research lab. As Sahin admits in his book, it had very little experience in infectious diseases. The 2018 contract with Pfizer to develop a flu vaccine, which, AFAIK, has remained a dead letter, was its sole initiative in this direction and seems to have been concluded precisely to provide BioNTech, a cancer therapy company, some infectious diseases bona fides. Moreover, BioNTech had no need whatsoever for a global regulatory affairs specialist since its cancer treatment trials were going strictly nowhere, as I discuss here: https://dailysceptic.org/2024/03/30/why-did-biontechs-first-cancer-trials-falter-the-german-regulator-must-know/. This is another sign that the company knew what was coming.
There were/are no coincidences during convid anymore…
However, some regions of Italy have been prone to flu-like-illnesses BEFORE CONVID. No doubt about it. I have been in contact with a nurse practitioner from one of those regions who fell victim to the “flu-like-illness” himself and so have many of his patients…
If you were to talk to him like I did, he’d never say this flu was the same as the previous ones ….
So, there may be an element of the convid scam yet to be uncovered.
I have his pictures in the ACU and all his medical history from day one. People who deny contagion would have a hard time in court to prove their case if they read his and his patients file…
Would love to know why and "how" he made his way to Australia, with the country being one of the countries critical to the flu "strain"/surveillance/shot racket.
It makes one wonder if Marco Jr was the source of advice to Reuben on regulatory matters given that RR's CV prior to 2019 appears to be a little thin in this area...
The impact of ‘bad’ science on judicial decision-making is a thorny aspect of the relationship between science and law. This study employs doctrinal and empirical analysis to explore two Italian judgments that asserted a causal link between childhood vaccines and autism. Using a combination of actor–network theory and legal pragmatism, we uncovered a network of actors and institutions internal and external to the legal system enabling these impactful decisions that went on to contribute to a crisis in vaccination coverage in Italy. These include trial strategies, resources, communication practices between arms of government, awareness and responsiveness of institutional actors, and institutional mechanisms governing the integration of scientific expertise into the legal process. By forensically analysing how a ‘zombie idea’ received a patent of legitimacy in the Italian context, this study provides useful lessons for legal systems grappling with complex and contested public health matters.
Italy 2020 – The Preposterous Pandemic
https://healthfreedomdefense.org/italy-2020-the-preposterous-pandemic/
"How did this supposed virus race around the world at lightning speed, travel over 5,000 miles from Wuhan to Lombardy, yet bypass regions in Italy (to the west and the east) which were only a short distance from Lombardy?
Central and Southern Italy do not seem to be impacted in any meaningful way by any alleged viral pathogen.
Even as the ages and pre-existing pathologies of COVID-attributed deaths are important bits of evidence which refute certain aspects of the “deadly coronavirus” story, the most incriminating pieces of evidence are the geographical anomalies observed in the data above.
How is it that massive clusters of alleged COVID deaths are situated alongside neighboring locales which experienced so few COVID deaths?
What was it about Italy’s autonomous regions that protected them from the ravages of this purported pathogen?
None of this makes sense. If this heavily advertised virus was as transmissible and deadly as the world was told the data wouldn’t look like this. Of the many contentious issues surrounding viruses, what’s not up for debate is that viruses are not subject to borders or geographical boundaries."
But the vid is super intelligent. It knows to stay away when you sit at your table in a restaurant and are eating, but it will for sure kill you if you don't have a mask on when you go to order or use the restroom.
Well, well, well...what ARE the odds? Crooked all the way down, if you ask me.
The whole thing stinks. And there is very little information to find about Rizzi senior. All terribly suspicious.
"European Commissioner for the Economy, Paolo Gentiloni, said: “The Investment Plan for Europe has a strong track record in supporting innovative biotech companies researching new therapies for serious diseases. The EIB’s €50 million in financing will allow BioNTech to take on more highly-specialized staff and push forward the research and development of treatments that could prove to be life-saving.”"
European Investment Bank provides funding of €50 million to BioNTech as part of the Investment Plan for Europe
17 December 2019
https://investors.biontech.de/news-releases/news-release-details/european-investment-bank-provides-funding-eu50-million-biontech
Very important. BioNTech gets first line of funding from EIB at the same time as Rizzi is being appointed and before anyone has ever heard about a "novel virus" in Wuhan, i.e. RIGHT before we hear about it. It will get a second tranche of funding from the EIB a few months later: this time explicitly connected to "Covid vaccine" development. Who is the president of the EIB at this time? The former German Foreign Office official Werner Hoyer. You can see him with Sahin, the CEO of BioNTech, and Ursula von der Leyen here: https://brownstone.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Screen-Shot-2023-12-24-at-12.44.33-PM.png. He's the man with the yellow scarf.
IMF Chief K Georgieva- "Vaccine policy is economic policy."
Kristalina Georgieva at the Joint WHO-IMF-WTO-WBG Press Conference
June 1, 2021
https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2021/06/01/sp060121-remarks-by-kristalina-georgieva-at-joint-who-imf-wto-wbg-press-conference
"There is a coming tsunami of mRNA medicines." - Melissa J. Moore, Ph.D. Chief Scientific Officer, Moderna
https://www.bitchute.com/video/TW3tyIGDFNdp/
BTW, looking again at that passage from Sahin’s book, there is one more oddity worth noting. This is supposedly Rizzi jr receiving the go-ahead for a clinical trial from the German regulator, the PEI. But, as we can see from his LinkedIn page, Ruben Rizzi does not even speak German. There is no way that an official agency of the German government is going to be sending an official communication to a German firm in English (much less Italian!). Like so many other aspects of Sahin’s book, this is fiction. Rizzi was not appointed to serve as liaison with the German regulator. So, why was he appointed?
Good point. Artistic license then!
Another interesting coincidence “Ruben joined BioNTech in December 2019 to provide regulatory support to its growing oncology pipeline.”
The cancer business is booming, who would have known that injecting chemical poisons directly into an organism would result in a cancer explosion. Quick let’s get a cancer vaccine ready as the “science” has already proven the causative agent is another pesky modeled virus called SV40. All connected. No coincidences.
It seems to me this is less a coincidence and more a cover story to provide plausible deniability. BioNTech was always a cancer research lab. As Sahin admits in his book, it had very little experience in infectious diseases. The 2018 contract with Pfizer to develop a flu vaccine, which, AFAIK, has remained a dead letter, was its sole initiative in this direction and seems to have been concluded precisely to provide BioNTech, a cancer therapy company, some infectious diseases bona fides. Moreover, BioNTech had no need whatsoever for a global regulatory affairs specialist since its cancer treatment trials were going strictly nowhere, as I discuss here: https://dailysceptic.org/2024/03/30/why-did-biontechs-first-cancer-trials-falter-the-german-regulator-must-know/. This is another sign that the company knew what was coming.
Thank you for this information, this was something I wasn’t aware of - so many more of the puzzle pieces are falling into place.
There were/are no coincidences during convid anymore…
However, some regions of Italy have been prone to flu-like-illnesses BEFORE CONVID. No doubt about it. I have been in contact with a nurse practitioner from one of those regions who fell victim to the “flu-like-illness” himself and so have many of his patients…
If you were to talk to him like I did, he’d never say this flu was the same as the previous ones ….
So, there may be an element of the convid scam yet to be uncovered.
I have his pictures in the ACU and all his medical history from day one. People who deny contagion would have a hard time in court to prove their case if they read his and his patients file…
And the connection with AIDS/HIV is interesting. Fauci, also Italian. "Doctor"
perhaps this person is the other brother... an Italian lawyer based in Italy https://eplr.lexxion.eu/article/EPLR/2020/2/5
Based in Australia, no? (Which would make it even funnier as a "coincidence")
yes - my bad - Marco jr is indeed a very pro vaccine Italian lawyer based in Australia...
Would love to know why and "how" he made his way to Australia, with the country being one of the countries critical to the flu "strain"/surveillance/shot racket.
indeed - and he seems to have a special interest in advocating for determining causation in vaccine injury cases being made as difficult as possible https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3275946
Incredible. Excellent finds.
Just imagine if people started asking questions about the flu shot. Lots of money to be made on lawsuits. Not good for someone like Rizzi!!
It makes one wonder if Marco Jr was the source of advice to Reuben on regulatory matters given that RR's CV prior to 2019 appears to be a little thin in this area...
Here's another interesting legal opinion from Marco Jr
https://research-repository.uwa.edu.au/en/publications/legitimising-a-zombie-idea-childhood-vaccines-and-autism-the-comp
Abstract
The impact of ‘bad’ science on judicial decision-making is a thorny aspect of the relationship between science and law. This study employs doctrinal and empirical analysis to explore two Italian judgments that asserted a causal link between childhood vaccines and autism. Using a combination of actor–network theory and legal pragmatism, we uncovered a network of actors and institutions internal and external to the legal system enabling these impactful decisions that went on to contribute to a crisis in vaccination coverage in Italy. These include trial strategies, resources, communication practices between arms of government, awareness and responsiveness of institutional actors, and institutional mechanisms governing the integration of scientific expertise into the legal process. By forensically analysing how a ‘zombie idea’ received a patent of legitimacy in the Italian context, this study provides useful lessons for legal systems grappling with complex and contested public health matters.