55 Comments
May 3Liked by Jonathan Engler

I work as a Paramedic and easily 50-75% of our callouts, prior to covid were to care homes. The truth is that the elderly are well served by the NHS, trundling in and out of hospital to have their chronic minor and major illnesses treated. We actually joke that an old person only has to cough and an Ambulance is called. That stopped overnight in early 2020 and I believe I only visited one or two until the end of the year. The reason was because the usually incessant calls had dried up to a trickle through fear of Covid. The care staff, relatives and patients didn’t want to go to hospital for fear of catching covid and the GP’s were refused to attend also from fear of Covid. The care homes had become leper colonies. What I believe was happening was that simple easily treated conditions, such as chest infections, were being neglected and allowed to fester into serious conditions like Sepsis. At this point, and with the patients struggling, the care staff and relatives were pleading with the GP’s to “do something!” and the GP’s were (remotely) prescribing Midazolam and Morphine to ‘calm’ the patients and suppress the most distressing symptoms, such as severe breathing difficulties. The care staff were being authorised by the GP’s to administer these medications and save the GP’s attending. This sedation unfortunately, once again, was what actually tipped these patients over the edge and killed them. The doctor would then write Covid on the death certificate.

Expand full comment

Very good analysis which is supported by the many testimonies from the Scottish inquiry.

Lockdown-fear-isolation-deterioration-neglect-DNRs-midazolam=COVID19

Scottish COVID inquiry 1 May 2024

https://twitter.com/biologyphenom/status/1786023349040111682

Expand full comment

Thanks. My reply on the thread:

"We were 'suspended' after me and my crewmate attempted CPR on a 50ish year old woman because we chose to not put on PPE and go in 'unprotected'.

We both believed that Covid was laughable nonsense and that someone of this age had a good chance of resuscitation being successful so we just went straight in.

Putting on the (ludicrous) PPE would have wasted precious minutes so we decided to ignore it.

Unfortunately she died but we did try."

Expand full comment

Thankyou for trying 🙏

Expand full comment
May 15·edited May 15

So obvious the way you explain.

I've always thought about all the people like yourself that acted in this or similar ways, but never got exposure.

Expand full comment
Oct 7Liked by Jonathan Engler

Insane. All those responsible will pay in hell for what they did, specially all the doctors and nurses who were the ones who used the guillotine of this madness on the public. If enough doctors and nursed would have said something, this would have ended in a couple of weeks. However they are NOT Healthcare professionals, they are mindless protocolists who clearly do not understand the meaning of “One size doesn’t fit all”.

Expand full comment
Oct 19Liked by Jonathan Engler

You're missing the point.

It was not the covid patients who were ill. it was the doctors and nurses who were ill.

They were 'infected' with a collective mental illness called Mass Psychosis which convinced them that an imaginary Illness (covid) was real and deadly.

As such they used Midazolam and Morphine in a futile attempt to 'cure' the elderly of this disease.

When the patients died it simply confirmed their belief that Covid had killed them, not the drugs they were prescribing. It's called confirmation bias and is the most prominent symptom of a Mass Psychosis outbreak.

I was NOT murder on the part of the clinicians but rather manslaughter through diminished responsibility.

No no one wants to hear this explanation but it's the truth.

Expand full comment
Oct 20Liked by Jonathan Engler

I agree, everything was due to misdiagnosis of normally occurring respiratory infections and related conditions. Coronaviruses are nothing new. There never was a novel illness of any kind, besides what you have described.

Expand full comment
author

I share that view, as you will know. The most frequently cited pushback I receive is "but what about the weird loss of taste or smell" - that surely means that something weord and hence novel was circulating.

I do not have an iron-clad answer to that (other than pointing out that the narrative which was sold to humanity was a global pandemic of a lethal respiratory virus, not a pandemic of temporary loss of taste).

I usually come down to a combination of psychogenic illness (ie nocebo effect) with possibly a side effect of the nasal and throat swabbing for the testing.

I also think that the symptoms associated with respiratory illnesses have always been extremely varied and there's a possibility that observer / confirmation bias is merely highlighting those which fit the expectation (strongly augmented by propaganda), making a random occurrence look like a spike.

What's your perspective?

Expand full comment

Yes, rumors are quite a powerful force. If everyone is talking about having new shoes, you want to have the new shoes as well or you feel out of place and "old-fashioned". About the 'Lost of taste and smell', it is quite a subjective experience and you don't notice if you don't pay attention to it. Most likely, for most people, this was the first time in their lives that someone was telling them to pay attention to it, and evidently the collective cognition enhances the intensity of the experience. This happens to children quite often, for example, when someone tells others that they have seen a ghost. All of the sudden, within a few days, everybody has seen one.

Regarding possible environmental factors, In addition to the swabs that were used, as you mentioned, masking, I think, is the most noticeable, as well as the hypochondriac use of disinfectants, air purifiers, hand sanitizers and other chemicals on a regular basis.

Expand full comment

Very interesting experiences.

Makes a lot sense, vis a vis, a bureaucratic scenario was put in place, and the outcomes followed, not necessarily an intentional kill-off.

Expand full comment

Thank you for your important testimony.

Expand full comment
May 4Liked by Jonathan Engler

What's more disturbing (and in some ways revealing) than the MSM ignoring this, as one would expect, is the fact that the vast majority of the primary "health freedom movement" media outlets are ignoring it as well.

The fact of the matter is that the "official" counter narrative to the "Covid" crimes also serves to cover up the "Covid" crimes.

And this takes us directly to the likes of CHD and RFK as well as the folks at FLCCC, Wellness Company, P Kory, P McCullough, T Lawrie, B Weinstein, Kirsch, R Cole, J Rose and too many others to name here.

They know this story is out there, it has been brought to their attention on multiple occasions, and have purposefully kept it off their pages and off their sites.

These first-hand testimonials (and so much other concrete evidence) lay waste to the conceits and conjectures of the foundational precepts of the "acceptable" dissent not least of which is the fantastical Wuhan Cover Up which is itself a cover story for what actually happened.

Quite simply the mass death that did occur in Spring 2020 had nothing to do with any natural or synthetic biological creation and all to do with very human and devious administrative slaughter.

Expand full comment

Hi Allen, i am actually blocked on X by most freedom groups in Scotland for ''calling them out'' on their failure to support my work on this ! Not a single serving Scottish MP/MSP has commetned on the inquiry since it began July 2023. Tells you everything about the so called ''pandemic'' response i think. Help spread the word ! Some very good comments here.

Also follow Freedompodcast on substack, youtube and X and therustler83 on X. We are the ONLY guys in the WORLD consistently following Scots COVID inquiry without strings attatched.

Expand full comment
May 4·edited May 4

I read yours and Rustler's work most every day and spread it around.

Why it is so vital is that it exposes the core fraud for what it was and is and puts a laser like focus on where people should be looking (rather than sci-fi lab leak nonsense). It's really an indictment of the entire hospital/care home system and calls into question the entire barbarism of the health management systems which are at present the biggest money spinners in the world for financial conglomerates. That must be protected at all costs from the perspective of the financial robber barons and they will go to great lengths to protect their cash cow.

Scratch beneath the surface we find that most of the prominent voices in the health freedom movement are directly and financially immersed in this health management system. They are running flak for the bigger fish while establishing and/or furthering their own cottage industry.

As an aside leading into 2020 would you say that within the higher levels of political/financial circles there have been discussions about "what to do" about the problems related to funding the pension system?

I know in the EU and in the US these discussions have been ongoing for the last decade or more.

As an example listen to this one minute at the 17:15-18:15 mark:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8aE2HF0jwJo&ab_channel=OxbowAdvisors

Expand full comment

Chilling…reducing the aged useless eaters by 50% in just a few years to take pressure off the financial system.

Expand full comment

Tptb have caused every financial problem, Covid proved exactly who is responsible for the mess when it highlighted the largest transfer of wealth in history.

They cannot bide to let folk who have worked all their lives to live in peace or retirement.

What makes it even more appalling is shipping millions of people into the west from poor countries who suck out from resources they haven’t paid a single penny towards. They then point the finger at the old for causing the drain and do their best to off as many as possible.

Expand full comment

I am banned from all social media. I am banned from X for going after the US DOD - Musk's benefactors.

Expand full comment

What causes a cold or respiratory dis-ease?

The establishment’s model of blood and lung physiology FAILS under scrutiny. I’ll explain why.

We breathe air not oxygen.

Air is measured by its moisture or humidity Eg its at 45% humidity today

Oxygen is measured by its dryness Eg medical oxygen has 67parts per million or less of water contamination.

The lung alveoli requires air reaching it to be at 100% humidity, that is dew point.

Can you comprehend the mis-match?

Oxygen is manufactured by stripping air of moisture. Oxygen is a product of air NOT a constituent of air.

There is no wild/natural oxygen in air. Oxygen becomes nitrogen with the addition of carbon particles to become a non-flammable version of oxygen. I have a link to a demonstration of this on my stack, a home oxygen concentrator is used.

The lungs are responsible for re-hydrating the red blood cells as they pass through the alveoli capillaries with salt water. The red blood cells are salt water sponges.

The saline intravenous drip rehydrates red blood cells and aids the lungs.

The insult that causes respiratory dis-stress is dehydration. It’s seasonal because cold air holds the least moisture and indoor room air often dries out with heating.

The dry mucosa must re-establish itself and the production of mucus goes into overdrive. The mucosa requires salt and moisture and it will move both from any bodily reserves. This causes pain as the extraction process goes into motion.

Now you know why the old remedies are successful.

Salt water gargles, nasal irrigations/inhalations and chicken soup / bone broth soups.

Sanatoriums were built along coastlines to take advantage of sea spray because it was known to heal injured lungs.

It is time the COMMONS reclaimed the knowledge of hydration and healing.

Hydration equals salt plus water.

Healing begins with hydration.

Oxygen’s toxicity is directly related to its power to dehydrate. Reactive oxygen species ROS describes damage due to dehydration.

Oxygen on release from a container will extract moisture from its surroundings to become air, its natural state. Oxygen released inside the respiratory tract extracts moisture from the mucosa and the delicate alveoli causing dehydration. This can kill.

Oxygen is a prescribed drug. It is primarily prescribed for the terminally ill. Palliative care is not kind.

We all need to comprehend the difference between air and oxygen. Read the material safety data sheets for oxygen and nitrogen. Both have unconsciousness and not breathing listed under inhalation.

Click on my blue icon to read article

Expand full comment
May 11Liked by Jonathan Engler

I can imagine the eyes of those reading this glazing over. What you are positing is far too foreign for most. The lack of comments to your post is informing. I would expect that some would reflexively question your sanity, or get on board with your insights…yet crickets. I have and will continue to follow you with great interest.

Expand full comment

My 3 articles have over 10k views between them. Your support is very much appreciated.

Expand full comment

Thanks for removing some of the glaze from my eyes. It’s true as a non-medical person, this kind of information is easy to skim over but the explanation of oxygen and the function of salt did pique my interest and as someone who has lot all faith in modern medicine, it is comforting to know we can fall back on old remedies and readily available ingredients to aid recovery from most things.

Expand full comment

That should read “lost all faith”

Expand full comment
May 3Liked by Jonathan Engler

Are there going to be sessions about what happened in hospitals?

Expand full comment

See testimony from Pamela Thomas who has recently spoke on TNT radio.

https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-inquiry-impact-hearing-9b1

See testimony from Eddie Mconnell, Chief Executive of Downs Syndrome Scotland

https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiry-impact-4ee

You might want to sit down and prepare.

Expand full comment
May 4·edited May 4

Are you aware of this study by the CDC in late 2020?

It gives the number 1 risk factor for dying in hospital of Covid as Obesity.

The number 3 risk factor was Diabetes.

But, bizarrely, the number 2 risk factor was ANXIETY!

Bizarrely because anxiety is a mental condition, not a physical condition. With a staggering 28% chance (or 1 in 3) of dying if you had this condition!

Don't make the mistake of assumming that this was anxiety caused by being in a hospital or by having covid. It wasn't.

This was an PAST MEDICAL HISTORY of anxiety. These people were suffering, and being treated for, anxiety way before 2020.

Therefore the obvious question is why an airbourne respiratory virus (covid) could identify and kill people having this mental illness?

I've been trying to show this for years but I don't think most people understand the massive implications of what this study shows.

If you're interested I'll give you my interpretation.

Look under abstracts, results where anxiety (and fear related disorders) is given as the number 2 risk factor with a 28% chance of dying in hospital, of covid, in 2020.

https://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2021/21_0123.htm

Expand full comment
author

I think you need to go further and elaborate on why anxiety results in this effect - ie through what physiological mechanisms.

For me, I have long considered that this may be a factor:

anxiety -> adrenaline -> peripheral vasocontriction -> low pulse ox readings (which don't refect central oxygenation) -> implementaion of the deadly hospital proptocols

Expand full comment
May 5Liked by Jonathan Engler

You've pretty much summed it up in your last 2 lines.

Extreme Hyperventilation (through anxiety) at some point causes oxygen saturations to drop. I don't know the what the exact physiological mechanism is but this study, with voluntary hyperventilation, seems to show that this is the case.

The important point is that the doctors, in early 2020, were on the look out for the 'unique' symptoms of severe Covid 19, the so called 'happy hypoxics'. Patients with severe breathing difficulties, no fever, and dangerously low oxygen saturations. They believed that these patients were soon to endure the cytokine storm and had to be put, preemptively, on a ventilator.

If panic attacks were mimicking this set of symptoms it would explain why so many of the deaths on ventilators had a past medical history of anxiety and, therefore, why anxiety would be a large risk factor.

Why I interpret this study differently, to most who believe this is Covid induced anxiety WHILST IN THE HOSPITAL, is that I am in the unique position of having seen many severe breathing difficulty patients in my job as a Paramedic.

I was screaming at the TV in early 2020 that the Covid patients shown on the TV or described in the media were not having Covid ARDS (acute respiratory distress syndrome) but simply having panic attacks. Obviously I was ridiculed by anyone who would listen that the Doctors "Know the difference between hyperventilation and ARDS" and it would be inconceivable that they could make that mistake.

My explanation is that, yes i agree, in normal times they would be able to make that distinction but early 2020 was not a normal time.

These doctors had gone temporarily insane in their belief that Covid was a deadly virus and were using confirmation bias to "see" Covid 19. The PCR was simply the icing on the cake to convince them that they were witnessing Covid ARDS when, in fact, they were seeing nothing of the sort.

Expand full comment
May 5Liked by Jonathan Engler

Sorry, forgot to attach the study on hyperventilation:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8118644/

Expand full comment

Thank you Mr. Engler. This should be shared widely.

Expand full comment
May 4·edited May 4Liked by Jonathan Engler

Thanks for this Jonathan. I need as much help as possible getting these (many world exclusive yet world ignored) testimonies out to more people so everyone can really see what went on during the lockdowns and make up their own mind was there a pandemic of deaths due to a novel virus or not ? I think not.

Also see/follow freedompodcast on substack, youtube and X and TheRustler83 on X. We are the ONLY guys in the WORLD consistently following Scots COVID inquiry without strings attatched. Dr Bruce Scott on X has also been a consistent voice of sanity since 2020 and has reposted many Scots inquiry clips as well as interviews about it all on TNT radio. The fearless Moira Dundee has even submitted documents to the police without success. https://twitter.com/Moira_Dundee/status/1777599516352332046

Expand full comment
May 4Liked by Jonathan Engler

Thank you very much for your work - I will highlight your Substack in my monthly covid muster.

Expand full comment

Need all the help i can get so many '''freedom/truthers'' are a massive disappointment. David Icke did repost recently which allowed the clip to reach over 500,000 views

Expand full comment

I understand, but also more people are understanding that there will be no 'justice' as most of what happened was legal under emergency powers - even the murders because they adhered to protocol. Most of the 'enquiries' are either designed to fail or just release valves cooling the marks. So, adaptations to failure.

All we can hope to do now is mourn and bury the dead and hope that fewer people will comply next time around.

I mean...it's been 23 years since 9/11 and the subsequent wars, and unlike the covid response that was actually illegal.

The covid response has decades of legislation behind it, so. Not much we can really do unfortunately.

Expand full comment

I agree the primary aim is to raise awareness of what really went to as as to prevent this in future. Unfortunately i believe pandemic -2 arrives in 2025. Even the Scottish COVID inquiry has a strong underlying theme like UK inquiry of 'inadequate PPE' and how guidance should actually be changed to law. Despite the criminality and harms admitted from the lockdown that too also appears to be part of the pre-determined conclusions, ie- lockdown harder/faster.

Expand full comment

Good people often have great difficulty understanding that during the covid emergency state-sponsored murder was legal. If murder is legal, there is no crime.

The criminals were the people who went against the orders and affirmed life.

You are welcome to look through my back catalogue to see the articles about this legislation, particularly where it is perfectly legal for police and army to kidnap and inject people by force, but it is often too much for people to handle and they mentally check out, instead preferring to think that the 'government commits crimes.'

Understanding requires people to really confront evil, and it can be terrifying.

They simply do not want to believe that laws like this exist.

Expand full comment
May 4Liked by Jonathan Engler

Truly evil

Expand full comment

Fear based reactionary thinking fuelled the cv19 assault. Why is the populace vulnerable too and compliant too THEIR fear based propaganda?

Salt restriction has been taught as a tool for health. This is a malfeasant directive.

Low salt also called hyponatremia also called dehydration results with salt restriction.

This makes the adrenals take charge because this is an emergency. Hyponatremia can kill. All the adrenocortical hormones are produced in response. This puts people into a constant state of fear, as if they have a tiger on their tail.

Fight/flight/freeze are their responses to pressure.

Their adrenals become fatigued or enlarged.

Stress is intolerable, compliance / avoidance / aggressive are their primary reactions. This makes media manipulation very easy.

The WHO boosts of the return on their investment campaigning to reduce salt intake.

Excerpt: Sodium reduction has since been recognized by WHO as one of the “best buys” in global public health, yielding an estimated return on investment of USD$13-78 for every dollar invested.

Source https://www.who.int/health-topics/noncommunicable-diseases/reducing-population-sodium-salt-intakes#tab=tab_1

Read my article: How does salt restriction lead to heart dis-ease and fear based reactionary thinking?

Click the blue icon.

Know all the symptoms of dehydration so you can take action to remedy.

Eg a headache is not a sign to pop a Panadol.

Hydration equals salt plus water.

Get salty and get back your thought control.

Expand full comment

I'm grateful to Dave for putting together these excerpts - this is a helpful summary.

The testimonials from the Scottish Covid Inquiry suggest Paramaniac's hypotheses need to be examined carefully as they ring true. FWIW not all GPs refused to visit care homes etc but I agree with Paramaniac that the inevitable consequence of policy recommendations would be missed sepsis, especially in the elderly. In our practice we were mindful of this risk from the outset and did our best, though it was difficult - people were terrified of hospitals, for fear of catching Covid or of dying alone without visitors (these were not unfounded fears); when admission was decided it was not always easy to admit frail elderly people to hospital with non-specific febrile illness. There was quite a fatalistic mindset for a few weeks in Spring 2020, which was unsettling.

Even though we had good data very early on from the Diamond Princess, it is my belief that the reports from Lombardy had a very significant impact on the UK pandemic response. The Lombardy experience was atypical, but skewed decision making in the UK. I would like to see more public discussion about distorted risk assessments at all levels and the thinking behind (and consequences of) resource-based triage. I have written about some of these issues from a GP point of view in my substack (chapters 3 to 6) https://thegreatcrapestryofcovid.substack.com/p/3-a-tsunami-is-coming?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2

Italian physicians reported their hospitals were very quickly overwhelmed with elderly people, so that when younger people came to be admitted there weren't enough beds/staff/ventilators for them. Much of what happened in the UK was an over-reaction, in an effort to head off such a catastrophe. What is worrying is that the London based UK Covid Inquiry seems to be biased towards reaching the opposite conclusion, that the the UK response was too little too late.

The message from Italy in March 2020 was that this was a deadly and untreatable disease especially in the elderly, so the only thing to be done was to stop it spreading. Our Health Secretary wrote to us about care homes, ‘Ordinarily mortality rates for these residents is between 13 and 17% illustrating the vulnerability of the group…It is not advised that residents in long term care are admitted to hospital for ongoing management but are managed within their current setting’.

When we critique such top-down policy recommendations we need to be honest about the mindest behind this, as I don't think we can avoid a repetition without frank open discussion and debate. There is outrage at the decision to knowingly or unknowingly send infected elderly people from hospital to care homes, and there would no doubt be similar public outrage if the opposite thing happened, especially when the Italian's had specifically warned of the consequences of doing so.

Fundamentally as a society we need to accept that it is not possible for every risk to be managed away and that all interventions carry risk too. In 2020-21 there was intense stigma around infection, with fear of spreading infection to 'the vulnerable', fear of being accused of spreading infection, or of the consequences of being accused of enabling infection spread through substandard infection control policies. Some of the care home policies on visiting would have been enforced for far longer than initially envisaged on the back of public accusations of staff or visitors seeding infection into the homes. This could turn into a bit of a witch hunt and got much worse after the 'asymptomatic superspreader' concept took hold. It is notable that despite all these punishingly restrictive 'shielding' policies, it was not possible to stop infection getting into care homes.

The Scottish Covid Inquiry is a necessary first step in publicly exposing the predictable human consequences of national and local pandemic policy decisions. I wish it would get more traction. In 2022 the Scottish Govt awarded themselves permanent powers to impose lockdowns and close schools in any future pandemic if certain conditions are met. If we are to avoid a re-run in the future, we need to ensure that the testimonials are investigated thoroughly to determine root cause. But my fear is that instead of a truth and reconciliation approach we might just see defensive posturing and scape-goating.

Expand full comment
author

The N Italy story is NOT one consistent with the spread of a novel pathogen:

https://open.substack.com/pub/pandauncut/p/were-the-unprecedented-excess-deaths

Expand full comment

But as you rightly point out in your article, many of the decisions about UK healthcare response and provision (or lack thereof), and decisions made regarding care homes, can be traced back to recommendations borne out of the Lombardy physician testimony in March 2020. And the lockdowns of course.

I recall an online RCPE talk in mid March 2020 titled 'Covid-19: Preparedness and challenges: The lessons learned from Italy'. Professor Francesco Castelli, Prof of Infectious Diseases in Brescia spoke about their experience. It was grim listening. He described their healthcare system soon to be overwhelmed, that they had to create 700 Covid beds and converted operating theatres and wards into ICUs, and that very few ICU beds were left for non covid illness. He quoted an overall CFR of 7.1% (3.5% 60-69, 12.3% 70-79) and that 10% of cases were Healthcare workers - this led to discussion about the fears and sacrifices of HCWs and the need to protect them from exposure. He described how they were diverting all their resource towards Covid out of necessity due to the huge number of cases, and of infections spreading within hospitals. He also unfortunately shared that photo of military trucks transporting coffins out of Bergamo, just to hammer home the seriousness of the situation. On the back of such reports, senior decision makers were planning for makeshift morgues for all the bodies and envisaging whole wards devoted to palliative care for people dying from this untreatable infection.

Another influential Italian expert was Dr Maurizio Cecconi, a British-Italian anaesthetist/ICU physician who was very relatable to UK physicians. I found it interesting to re-watch one of his early interviews 'Coronavirus in Italy - Report From The Front Lines' (13 Mar 2020) (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKS1pahoPRU). He reported 10% of those INFECTED needed intensive care (which is what generated alarming headlines like 'Coronavirus UK warning: Italy issues dire warning to UK ‘1 in 10 will need intensive care’ https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1253009/coronavirus-uk-latest-news-italy-warning-nhs-bed-intensive-care-boris-johnson).

When it comes to critiquing the UK response, I think we need to recognise the impact this sort of reported 'lived experience' on UK HCWs. NHS workers were told that though 80% of cases were 'mild', 20%-30% of cases were severe (admitted to hospital), up to 10% were intubated and 2-5% died. Almost every educational update contained these same erroneous/atypical statistics and unfortunately they informed risk assessments and risk communication for a long time. It was frustrating for those of us who could see very early on that these figures were not accurate for our population.

There are some potential clues as to why the Lombardy experience was atypical. Cecconi repeatedly states that they guaranteed an ICU bed for anyone who needed it, and from his description they had a much lower bar for ICU admission than we do in the UK. So 10% needing ICU is based on their criteria for ICU admission, which would never have been matched in the UK. He also stated that almost all on ICU were invasively mechanically ventilated (which probably is what led to the ventilator panic). At the same time that the hospitals were filling up, they quarantined 20% of the healthcare workers based on PCR swabs and most of these people were asymptomatic. They also didn't discharge Covid positive patients from hospital until they had 2 negative PCRs. All this had a negative impact on their ability to cope with non Covid healthcare needs.

Your article is fascinating when cross-referenced with the Cecconi and Castelli interviews. I imagine they might find your hypothesis offensive given what they went through, but it does seem clear that the PCR testing created a lot of chaos and panic.

Expand full comment

Italy used Midazolam on its patients as well, it’s no wonder the images of people on tv in their hospitals shown to be suffocating to death struck terror and compliance into millions.

I’ve brought Midazolam up in conversations and I’ve been looked at as if I’ve gone out or just a blank stare.

I’ve found those who bought into all the crap just can’t comprehend how big and how bad it and our politicians and medical staff are, they stay in denial because it’s easier than admitting how evil tptb are.

Expand full comment

Jonathan, I wrote this article recently. I think Bridgen let slip the official motive for the care home murders in an interview. This article is my most banned article and it has even been shadowbanned on Substack. https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/for-the-greater-good-did-uk-mp-andrew

Thank you for highlighting the situation in Scotland. Yes, it is amazing what one can hear when one pays attention.

Expand full comment

I believe the motive is a well established "need" to quickly bring down the unfunded liability "problem" which is crushing the EU/UK and the US financial sectors aka racketeering operations.

In short eliminating pensioners and those on disability.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8aE2HF0jwJo&ab_channel=OxbowAdvisors

17:15-18:15 mark

Expand full comment

Maybe this is what they are telling the terrified middle managers and the face-forwards people in the 'freedom movement' in the financial realm but ultimately I do not buy it. 'They' in charge of the Bank for International Settlements can print more money - they have all the money. This is not really about money.

Imo this is about ritual Satanic sacrifice and seeing what people will go along with as well as depopulation - they want the world for themselves and want to restructure the population. They simply do not need or want all of us and have just decided to get rid of us, so it's easier to get rid of the old and the sick and the compliant first. That is the numbers game.

I mean, would you want to live in a world with compliant idiots who cannot create anything and are terrified of their own shadows? Neither do they, which is why they are getting rid of them. This includes the useful idiots like the politicians and doctors who did the killing. Hopefully people can see where this is headed for the people who resist. At some point, there will be a choice for us to make.

Expand full comment

So instead of going after the murderers, the world is busy chasing the "virus" makers. Good luck getting justice if your parents were murdered.

Expand full comment

Understand

Covid Plandemic was planned 20 years ago and senior government officials agreed a response in advance - project fear similar to polio scare and others. Oh, the polio vaccine contained SV40 hereditary cancer virus in the 50’s and 60’s that killed 10’s millions and is still found in childhood cancers today

The likes of Gates, Faucci, WHO, FDA, WEF & our security services are all complicit

Covid virus cannot be isolated because it is a form of influenza A & B and no more than that

Cheap effective treatments such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine had to be ridiculed and banned to allow emergency use authorisation of the experimental mRNA kill shot allowing mass wealth transfer, economic suicide and illnesses that is overwhelming health services. Massive bribes to officials and MSM and the likes of google search blocking anything that opposes the official narrative will prevent any disclosure of this evil for a very long time.

MSN are only profitable because of big pharma support - hence their complete silence about this

Senior government officials were fully aware of the terrible adverse reactions and deaths and were informed in early 2021 by many doctors, researchers and scientist that the world was facing a catastrophic biological health crises, but they had all signed up to this agenda and just carried on and on. Even today they are still pushing this treatment.

Such is the state of the world where a spiritually wicked powerful few in high places are being allowed to destroy by a corrupt establishment

This is why it is vital that Trump, JFK and perhaps Musk get into power so they can at least stand in the way if this tyranny

Expand full comment

Jonathan, why nuke my comment that was on topic?

Expand full comment
author

OMG have I deleted something? Accidental if I have. Apologies. Which comment?

Expand full comment
May 15Liked by Jonathan Engler

Shhhiiittt, I ended up on another thread, leave this up as an example of your decency and my recklessness.

Expand full comment
author

Lol

Expand full comment

Puts me in High Rage!

Expand full comment