Did you find anything on murder of the unborn? I believe Naomi Wolf's team saw from the Pfizer covid documents that miscarriages in their trials were considered 'resolved medical issues.'
They will definitely take it especially if frightened enough. It's winter here and people are still happily jabbing in Australia. Young and old. Injuries and deaths were simply not widespread enough to put most people off, or can be atributed to 'other causes,' and media/pharma/government has a chokehold on the narrative. The jab campaign is intense - there are posters in most public areas to jab.
Conversely in the UK all Covid booster posters have been removed in my local GP centre (except one obscured behind reception) and the internal pharmacy won’t administer the boosters ( I know because I was earwigging when an elderly man asked to book one). They are heavily promoting diabetes checks, shingles jabs and statins though.
The Shingles jab ads are on going...they've changed the promoting jingle 'let's get Shingles ready' to something else equally banal. Must be something 'magic' in them.....or, maybe not, probably zilch.
Personally, I'm hoping very hard that the perps will no longer be able to fool enough of the people, enough of the time - and Never Again!.
Some of 'the people' DO seem to have a religious awe of and 'belief in medicine', possibly because they're on lots of pharma drugs. I have an old and treasured friend suffering with that - and a belief system of that type will admit no 'blasphemy', even if they're polite to the 'conspiracy theorists' and their data, studies and documents that are not even worth their looking at...
But others I'm related to/know, even while holding onto their trust in their (pharmafia-informed) doctors and propaganda TV programming, have been saying for some time that one or two COVID shots were enough, and at least have avoided boosters.
And I gather that, in the US and some other places, rates of vaccinations/jabs are way down. Also, the 'Bird Flu' didn't fly the last time it was tried, so a revolt against the revolting, once the agenda's being pushed hard, might well be likely.
I found in the text of PMC6446137 that it only reported on the first 43 days, while complete phase II follow-up for each study subject was one year. The deaths you found in the repository likely pertain to deaths after Day 43 but there still might be shenanigans being pulled here.
"We present safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity data from healthy adult and elderly subjects to establish the optimal vaccine formulation for these age groups. Here we present primary and secondary outcome data from these 13-month studies, up to study day 43."
Interesting aside: for some odd reason, the repository links for me appear broken, even though I'm using a United States server to try to access them.
I just tried the links again. They work for me. Can you find them at the repository using the ID numbers in the FDA data sheet?
On the other point, yes, it looks like the paper was given that objective. Extraordinary. Unless there’s a mistake in clinicaltrisls.gov, the authors can’t have been unaware that 4 previously healthy non-elderly died within the year of dosing, but decided it was ok not to mention it?
They didn't work again, but I get a secure connection warning and it may be that I have my settings set so that they are too "over-sensitive" regarding warnings (because of my previous history with digital disruption).
They do say, as you've quoted, that the data was presented 'up to study day 43'. Not through the 13 months.
Appears to me, at least, as though they're 'strategically stopping' the data reports before too many more study participants keel over, and awareness grows.
Apart from all else, they'll run out of subjects a lot faster if it's made any more evident that such studies are seemingly more like Russian Roulette than a scientific safety study.
Did you find anything on murder of the unborn? I believe Naomi Wolf's team saw from the Pfizer covid documents that miscarriages in their trials were considered 'resolved medical issues.'
Just… wow. Literally inhuman
I will be shocked if anyone will take it...but I've been shocked before.
They will definitely take it especially if frightened enough. It's winter here and people are still happily jabbing in Australia. Young and old. Injuries and deaths were simply not widespread enough to put most people off, or can be atributed to 'other causes,' and media/pharma/government has a chokehold on the narrative. The jab campaign is intense - there are posters in most public areas to jab.
Conversely in the UK all Covid booster posters have been removed in my local GP centre (except one obscured behind reception) and the internal pharmacy won’t administer the boosters ( I know because I was earwigging when an elderly man asked to book one). They are heavily promoting diabetes checks, shingles jabs and statins though.
We had all the shingles and diabetes ads in February - cycling by season.
What a shitshow.
Edit: this was the height of summer LMAO https://www.9news.com.au/national/vaccine-shortage-for-shingles-leaves-australians-waiting-in-blistering-pain/7397cc41-0ec0-4777-80fd-1cc24d1e411c
The Shingles jab ads are on going...they've changed the promoting jingle 'let's get Shingles ready' to something else equally banal. Must be something 'magic' in them.....or, maybe not, probably zilch.
I believe Herpes Zostra is given name for shingles...pretty sure it's a listed ADR on many a Covax package insert too. Pure coincidence of course
They’ll be told it’s safe and effective & anyone with different views will be classified as “dangerous irrational anti-vax”.
Then lots of people will take it. Because governments & powerful multinational corporations would never lie, would they?
Personally, I'm hoping very hard that the perps will no longer be able to fool enough of the people, enough of the time - and Never Again!.
Some of 'the people' DO seem to have a religious awe of and 'belief in medicine', possibly because they're on lots of pharma drugs. I have an old and treasured friend suffering with that - and a belief system of that type will admit no 'blasphemy', even if they're polite to the 'conspiracy theorists' and their data, studies and documents that are not even worth their looking at...
But others I'm related to/know, even while holding onto their trust in their (pharmafia-informed) doctors and propaganda TV programming, have been saying for some time that one or two COVID shots were enough, and at least have avoided boosters.
And I gather that, in the US and some other places, rates of vaccinations/jabs are way down. Also, the 'Bird Flu' didn't fly the last time it was tried, so a revolt against the revolting, once the agenda's being pushed hard, might well be likely.
So, I continue to hope...
Jonathan,
I found in the text of PMC6446137 that it only reported on the first 43 days, while complete phase II follow-up for each study subject was one year. The deaths you found in the repository likely pertain to deaths after Day 43 but there still might be shenanigans being pulled here.
"We present safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity data from healthy adult and elderly subjects to establish the optimal vaccine formulation for these age groups. Here we present primary and secondary outcome data from these 13-month studies, up to study day 43."
Interesting aside: for some odd reason, the repository links for me appear broken, even though I'm using a United States server to try to access them.
I just tried the links again. They work for me. Can you find them at the repository using the ID numbers in the FDA data sheet?
On the other point, yes, it looks like the paper was given that objective. Extraordinary. Unless there’s a mistake in clinicaltrisls.gov, the authors can’t have been unaware that 4 previously healthy non-elderly died within the year of dosing, but decided it was ok not to mention it?
They didn't work again, but I get a secure connection warning and it may be that I have my settings set so that they are too "over-sensitive" regarding warnings (because of my previous history with digital disruption).
I'll reach the page eventually.
They do say, as you've quoted, that the data was presented 'up to study day 43'. Not through the 13 months.
Appears to me, at least, as though they're 'strategically stopping' the data reports before too many more study participants keel over, and awareness grows.
Apart from all else, they'll run out of subjects a lot faster if it's made any more evident that such studies are seemingly more like Russian Roulette than a scientific safety study.
Yes, though the publication clearly states the objective included studying safety for a year:
“Each subject was followed for 12 months (day 387) after the second vaccine dose to assess safety and immunogenicity.”
Anyway, have added a para to the article on that, thanks.
One more point: the one death that was reported was at day 155....so I have even less idea what is going on here!
Again, what virus?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8580522/ "Evidence for a connection between coronavirus disease-19 and exposure to radiofrequency radiation from wireless communications including 5G"