So for £22.58 per child the GPs en masse were prepared to ignore the JCVI expert advice! I am ashamed of what used to be a proud and honourable profession. I thought doctors were supposed to practice evidence based medicine, but clearly I am much mistaken.
I guess everyone has his price, but this does not even begin to equate to the thirty pieces of silver for the utter betrayal of our children.
Successive governments have failed to protect our children from gang rape and torture but if a child’s welfare is worth so little perhaps I should not be surprised!
When the product is such garbage, you gotta pay people to push it. Sounds like mafia tactics.
If the shots are so easily available in pharmacies etc, this incentive is just corporate welfare.
Oh and the platform has been known to be toxic way before covid... But for some reason many still focus on the bullshit distractions of "spike protein" and mRNA.
(See the bottom link and quote where a non mRNA non covid product also causes myocarditis!)
Let's make sure that all of these politicians are up to date on their boosters. And not a photo op... They should have to go to a random place and get a real shot.
The video is long, but the research papers referred to at the end of the video make it clear that the pathogenic effects of the LNPs have been long known about.
Greg Harrison presents evidence that ingredients in the lipid nanoparticles (which encapsulated the supposed modified RNA destined to produce spike protein inside the cells) may trigger an abnormal clotting process, possibly at the moment that these nanoparticles fuse with the membranes of the cells that line the blood vessels into which the vaccine is taken up randomly. This process has many aspects but particularly involves the element phosphorous and the clot precursor protein fibronectin.
These starting clots may initially be tiny conglomerates, free in the blood stream, which can anchor at sites of inflammation – which inevitably are provoked when the immune system attacks the spike proteins as they are poked back out through the blood vessel walls after production. Or the clots can be initiated at this point. Once attached at the site of inflammation in a blood vessel wall, a self-perpetuating process of polymerisation occurs, with replicating protein structures binding tightly together in an ever-increasing mass.
Electrochemical charges, blood flow, and the lack of the usual platelets and red cells in the clot substance, keep the clot growing downstream in the centre of the vein or artery, decreasing blood flow. This may not produce any symptoms as the blood is still flowing around the clot, but eventually an important blood vessel may block enough to cause symptoms or even death.
Yep, I'm just a bit confused why they keep bringing up spike protein which is supposedly from COVID... When this has been an issue way way before COVID.
Here's a paper talking about how without mRNA, they had issues with induced myocarditis.
"The recent observation of a similar adverse event in a recipient of the non-mRNA, peptide-based NVX-CoV2373 in the frame of a phase III clinical trial with 7020 participants in the active treatment arm raises the question whether the lipid nanoparticle sheath, which is a common structural component of these platforms could be implicated in the pathogenesis of vaccine-induced myocarditis."
Latypova suggests that the mRNA cannot be made in bulk successfully and that any proteins created from mRNA are not reliably "spike" but truncated, short or broken forms. She showed this also from the western blots which were smeared all over with different proteins rather than a nice clear band of identical weight.
The abnormal spikes can still be toxic though.
People who are performing the analysis of the vials say that none are identical with another they are all adulterated in some way.
Latypova even says that some vials have gobs of unidentified protein in the bottom - not genetic instructions to make protein but actual protein.
Probably the only constant factor is the LNP constituent.
Latypova does not believe there is graphene in the shots, but plenty of other adulterants. It looks as if most of what we were told about how the "vaccines" work is just fantasy. They do have DNA contaminants and SV40 for transfection, and plenty of strange metals...the problem is that spike protein (or something like it ) is detected by antibody screening...
Yeah, the "spike" they talk about is a fantasy of how COVID looks like under the microscope.
If you do a control experiment of a viral culture sample, you still get these spikey things (which used to be called exosomes?!?) .
When doing electron microscopy, they have to stain the sample with heavy metal dyes and other toxic preservatives. That's basically the reason why "viruses" are visible. Technically they're damaged cell matter and proteins.
Problem with science is not the instruments used, but the interpretation of the result based on the methods used.
I cancelled my membership in 2020 after RCGP declined my request for it to condemn unethical aspects of UK Covid policies. So should all GPs. To hell with it. Captured, corrupted and hollowed out to the core. Corrupt UK makes Robocop’s Detroit look pretty.
I did the exam, but never paid to join the Royal College, thank God. Reading this made me feel sick. I truly believe that many practising doctors have no idea where their various professional fees go, or how compromised their professional bodies are. At University College Dublin in the eighties, we were required to pass a module on ethics before graduating. I suspect that module's long gone.
Undergraduate Med students should be taught how to look for bias, conflicts of interest, and how to critically appraise scientific papers. When I first practiced as a GP, we were paid a capitation fee, that is a flat fee per patient. If you were useless, the patients were free to go elsewhere. It was Blair and New Labour who introduced fee per item of service, with all the horrors that that produced.
The rank and file GPs will accept guidelines as best practice and go along with it. As Brian points out the hierarchy of the RCGP are not experts so should have not given an opinion far less exhorting their flock to agree. The JCVI are those with the knowledge expertise and experience and possibly the only view to adopt.Their opinion would not have been available to the average GP.
However irrespective of the fact that Covid had little impact on young people and children one would have thought there should have been little enthusiasm to give the jab except for the financial recompense!
Neil, in the same vein of your reply I recall reading through the transcript of a Senate heating in the US many years ago. IIRC, but I paraphrase:
A doctor was summoned to explain the discrepancy between his huge vaccination rate in his practice and the fact that he hadn't done the same for his children. (The beauty of public records, eh?)
His reply:
"As a professional, I must follow the guidance of my governing professional body. As a parent, I must do what I consider best for my family."
The £10 supplement thing is just horrific. Note point 15 under the one that you quoted in those C1348 notes is a helpful "How To" guide to those wanting to get their grubby paws on the £10. Bending over backwards to pocket the cash.
"If the juxtaposition of these various paragraphs above is not mind-blowing enough, note that the entity behind approval reference C1384 also saw the need to point out to its audience of over-enthusiastic injectors that only a single ‘£10 supplement per vaccination is claimable’. One would have thought that medics of professional standing would know that fraud is a crime… but perhaps they know more than us about the realpolitik of day-to-day medical accounting".
These are SICK, 🤕 TWISTED 🥨 AND 😈 DEMONIC PEOPLE WHO ARE DOING THEIR VERY BEST TO KILL AS MANY PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE WITH ALL THIER CLOT/ KILL SHOTS, VENGEANCE IS MINE SAITH THE LORD
I know a chartered accountant with two GP's on their books.
In one year, after the convid jab rollout, they EACH made and EXTRA £100,000 income after tax purely from the jab bonuses.
The medical profession is the real "oldest profession".
So for £22.58 per child the GPs en masse were prepared to ignore the JCVI expert advice! I am ashamed of what used to be a proud and honourable profession. I thought doctors were supposed to practice evidence based medicine, but clearly I am much mistaken.
I guess everyone has his price, but this does not even begin to equate to the thirty pieces of silver for the utter betrayal of our children.
Successive governments have failed to protect our children from gang rape and torture but if a child’s welfare is worth so little perhaps I should not be surprised!
#Endstagecapitalism
When the product is such garbage, you gotta pay people to push it. Sounds like mafia tactics.
If the shots are so easily available in pharmacies etc, this incentive is just corporate welfare.
Oh and the platform has been known to be toxic way before covid... But for some reason many still focus on the bullshit distractions of "spike protein" and mRNA.
https://robc137.substack.com/p/years-before-mrna-and-spike-protein
(See the bottom link and quote where a non mRNA non covid product also causes myocarditis!)
Let's make sure that all of these politicians are up to date on their boosters. And not a photo op... They should have to go to a random place and get a real shot.
Karma bitches.
The video is long, but the research papers referred to at the end of the video make it clear that the pathogenic effects of the LNPs have been long known about.
https://nzdsos.com/2024/09/17/the-white-clots-story-is-here-to-stay/
Greg Harrison presents evidence that ingredients in the lipid nanoparticles (which encapsulated the supposed modified RNA destined to produce spike protein inside the cells) may trigger an abnormal clotting process, possibly at the moment that these nanoparticles fuse with the membranes of the cells that line the blood vessels into which the vaccine is taken up randomly. This process has many aspects but particularly involves the element phosphorous and the clot precursor protein fibronectin.
These starting clots may initially be tiny conglomerates, free in the blood stream, which can anchor at sites of inflammation – which inevitably are provoked when the immune system attacks the spike proteins as they are poked back out through the blood vessel walls after production. Or the clots can be initiated at this point. Once attached at the site of inflammation in a blood vessel wall, a self-perpetuating process of polymerisation occurs, with replicating protein structures binding tightly together in an ever-increasing mass.
Electrochemical charges, blood flow, and the lack of the usual platelets and red cells in the clot substance, keep the clot growing downstream in the centre of the vein or artery, decreasing blood flow. This may not produce any symptoms as the blood is still flowing around the clot, but eventually an important blood vessel may block enough to cause symptoms or even death.
Yep, I'm just a bit confused why they keep bringing up spike protein which is supposedly from COVID... When this has been an issue way way before COVID.
Here's a paper talking about how without mRNA, they had issues with induced myocarditis.
"The recent observation of a similar adverse event in a recipient of the non-mRNA, peptide-based NVX-CoV2373 in the frame of a phase III clinical trial with 7020 participants in the active treatment arm raises the question whether the lipid nanoparticle sheath, which is a common structural component of these platforms could be implicated in the pathogenesis of vaccine-induced myocarditis."
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357121327_Potential_implications_of_lipid_nanoparticles_in_the_pathogenesis_of_myocarditis_associated_with_the_use_of_mRNA_vaccines_against_SARS-CoV-2
Latypova suggests that the mRNA cannot be made in bulk successfully and that any proteins created from mRNA are not reliably "spike" but truncated, short or broken forms. She showed this also from the western blots which were smeared all over with different proteins rather than a nice clear band of identical weight.
The abnormal spikes can still be toxic though.
People who are performing the analysis of the vials say that none are identical with another they are all adulterated in some way.
Latypova even says that some vials have gobs of unidentified protein in the bottom - not genetic instructions to make protein but actual protein.
Probably the only constant factor is the LNP constituent.
That would explain why some batches were horrible with almost instant anaphylaxis.
I recall some factories had mold contamination too.
Graphene is likely in some shots too but because it's used as a super low temperature capable lubricant.
I remember how obsessed many were about graphene but they couldn't seem to have any objective measurements to prove this besides microscopy.
Latypova does not believe there is graphene in the shots, but plenty of other adulterants. It looks as if most of what we were told about how the "vaccines" work is just fantasy. They do have DNA contaminants and SV40 for transfection, and plenty of strange metals...the problem is that spike protein (or something like it ) is detected by antibody screening...
https://doctors4covidethics.org/alternate-mechanisms-of-mrna-vaccine-toxicity-which-one-is-the-main-culprit/
Yeah, the "spike" they talk about is a fantasy of how COVID looks like under the microscope.
If you do a control experiment of a viral culture sample, you still get these spikey things (which used to be called exosomes?!?) .
When doing electron microscopy, they have to stain the sample with heavy metal dyes and other toxic preservatives. That's basically the reason why "viruses" are visible. Technically they're damaged cell matter and proteins.
Problem with science is not the instruments used, but the interpretation of the result based on the methods used.
I cancelled my membership in 2020 after RCGP declined my request for it to condemn unethical aspects of UK Covid policies. So should all GPs. To hell with it. Captured, corrupted and hollowed out to the core. Corrupt UK makes Robocop’s Detroit look pretty.
Thanks for writing your substack. ❤
A GP I know went to Mozambique to work when "covid" hit, rather than work in the NHS.
I did the exam, but never paid to join the Royal College, thank God. Reading this made me feel sick. I truly believe that many practising doctors have no idea where their various professional fees go, or how compromised their professional bodies are. At University College Dublin in the eighties, we were required to pass a module on ethics before graduating. I suspect that module's long gone.
Undergraduate Med students should be taught how to look for bias, conflicts of interest, and how to critically appraise scientific papers. When I first practiced as a GP, we were paid a capitation fee, that is a flat fee per patient. If you were useless, the patients were free to go elsewhere. It was Blair and New Labour who introduced fee per item of service, with all the horrors that that produced.
A fee per item of service is a useful mechanism to control medicine and how patients are treated.
Our institutions are bloated with corrupt cash!
I was not aware that RCGP or GPs had expertise in vaccines, virology, immunology etc so why were they asked for an opinion - rhetorical question!
The rank and file GPs will accept guidelines as best practice and go along with it. As Brian points out the hierarchy of the RCGP are not experts so should have not given an opinion far less exhorting their flock to agree. The JCVI are those with the knowledge expertise and experience and possibly the only view to adopt.Their opinion would not have been available to the average GP.
However irrespective of the fact that Covid had little impact on young people and children one would have thought there should have been little enthusiasm to give the jab except for the financial recompense!
Neil, in the same vein of your reply I recall reading through the transcript of a Senate heating in the US many years ago. IIRC, but I paraphrase:
A doctor was summoned to explain the discrepancy between his huge vaccination rate in his practice and the fact that he hadn't done the same for his children. (The beauty of public records, eh?)
His reply:
"As a professional, I must follow the guidance of my governing professional body. As a parent, I must do what I consider best for my family."
Ralph
It used to be what would you(a doctor) do for a family member?
I wonder if it ever did.
Medicine is littered with utterly ridiculous historical (and current) procedures.
It's just appalling, isn't it?
The £10 supplement thing is just horrific. Note point 15 under the one that you quoted in those C1348 notes is a helpful "How To" guide to those wanting to get their grubby paws on the £10. Bending over backwards to pocket the cash.
https://hartuk.substack.com/p/you-tolerated-that-your-children
"If the juxtaposition of these various paragraphs above is not mind-blowing enough, note that the entity behind approval reference C1384 also saw the need to point out to its audience of over-enthusiastic injectors that only a single ‘£10 supplement per vaccination is claimable’. One would have thought that medics of professional standing would know that fraud is a crime… but perhaps they know more than us about the realpolitik of day-to-day medical accounting".
.
My favorite parts of Covid:
#42
All I see are people that gave up on themselves and forfeited their minds.
.
There's REAL DOCTORS WHO HOLD THIER OATH TO "DO NO HARM", THEN THERES ALL THE OTHER ONES WHO CAN BE BOUGHT......PROOF IS IN THE $$$$ 🏦 🏧 ACCOUNT.
These are SICK, 🤕 TWISTED 🥨 AND 😈 DEMONIC PEOPLE WHO ARE DOING THEIR VERY BEST TO KILL AS MANY PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE WITH ALL THIER CLOT/ KILL SHOTS, VENGEANCE IS MINE SAITH THE LORD