16 Comments
User's avatar
Dr Lidiya Angelova's avatar

Science publishing has nothing to do with science. I am trying to make people aware but honestly I am tired because they don't care .....

https://genuineprospect.com/2024/02/07/whats-wrong-with-science-and-peer-review/

Truth if if we don't kill the "snake" we will continue to suffer from its poison.

Expand full comment
Jonathan Engler's avatar

Agreed. Just wondering if you had seen Toby Rogers' latest?

He covers a LOT of ground.

https://tobyrogers.substack.com/p/how-big-pharma-hijacked-evidence

Expand full comment
Dr Lidiya Angelova's avatar

No. Will check it out. I have several articles on pharma/healtcare.

2 recent

https://angelovalidiya.substack.com/p/into-the-drug-safety-black-hole

https://angelovalidiya.substack.com/p/modern-healthcare-the-urgency-of

On the bottom is revolving door and lobbying.

Well known...

So what.

Removing pink glasses is painful....

I am tired.

5 years working for free to help people who want to be lab rats.

What a fool, I am.

Expand full comment
Fager 132's avatar

Eventually enough of them will be damaged, frustrated, and killed by "evidence-based" medicine, which is deliberately built around fraudulent "studies," that even the uninterested will notice. If they're still around.

Expand full comment
Dr Lidiya Angelova's avatar

Well, who's gonna help them We will be long gone.

Expand full comment
Fager 132's avatar

They'll have to help themselves. That's the responsibility and birthright of every human. Whether they accept it or not is their problem. You can lead a whore to culture but you can't make her think.

Expand full comment
Robert Kogon's avatar

It's a way of coopting the Covid opposition, and it has worked, as the case you cite shows. This "SARS Spike thing they made". Who made? Endorsing the scary lab-leaked virus theory has become the ticket to remaining part of the Twitter-approved opposition which likes to think that it now has influence in Washington.

So much influence that it even managed to get a myocarditis warning "added" to the C-19 vaccines that was already there in 2021! https://x.com/EdV1694/status/1945122544446521359 In fact, the 2021 warning was less ambiguous. It did not attempt to minimize the risk like the current, supposedly heroic FDA does.

The issue is not whether "something" was circulating or not. There is always something circulating anyway. The issue is whether the something circulating that the PCRs were picking up had any connection to a novel disease, and, as you know, the PCRs in question -- whose very packaging indicated they were not suitable for diagnostic purposes! -- could never do that. We need to get back to the PCRs. But the Twitter-approved opposition will not talk about them at all.

Expand full comment
Jessica Hockett's avatar

To your point re: the recycling of "old news" to co-opt/direct opposition, I have an email from Sept 2021 in which I cited the already-demonstated risk of myocardits in teen males in an argument against (illegal) mandatory quarantines for "COVID positive" unvaccinated students

Expand full comment
Jessica Hockett's avatar

The advice of my grad school prof was pure gold:

Always read the methods section first.

Expand full comment
Jonathan Engler's avatar

Wise advice.

Also: always look at any supplementary info. It often contains something which the authors felt they had to make public, but not TOO public.

Expand full comment
Jessica Hockett's avatar

Yep.

And the footnotes -- never neglect or forget the footnotes!

Expand full comment
Rob (c137)'s avatar

Spike protein, aka damaged cell matter phrased as it was something new.

Same with prions..."misfolded proteins" which are just damaged proteins aka debris.

Neither are the cause, but the result of disease whether quackzines or toxic medicines like hospitals used.

Oh and the shot issues happened way before this mRNA and spike hype.

https://robc137.substack.com/p/years-before-mrna-and-spike-protein

Expand full comment
Cees Mul's avatar

Permission to add more logic?

The 'vaccines' force the body cells to create the spike protein. This is a problem since those proteins can potentially create havoc. Not even mentioning other proteins that can be accidentally created.

The virus itself (assuming it actually exists) has those specific spike proteins which are used to 'unlock' certain receptors on the cell membrane. Thats my high level understanding.

So, how on earth would free floating spike (SARS cov19) proteins exist in a non-mRNA jabbed person? Maybe I oversimplify the issue, but has there been any concern about free floating spike proteins prior to the mRNA jabs era?

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Hart's avatar

Can you please clarify your position Jonathan? Are you refuting the possibility the vaccines could cause harm?

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Hart's avatar

I’m speaking generally Jonathan, the possibility that ingredients in vaccines could cause harm, eg fetal bovine serum in the MMR, aluminium in aluminium-adjuvanted vaccines, etc.

Expand full comment
Brian's avatar

If something was already circulating that did what the vaccine did, then why vaccinate everyone? (I’m assuming the vaccine had some ulterior purpose.) Keep in mind that the government never has cared about our health and then all of a sudden wanted to make sure that no one died of Covid when no one was dying of it anyway. And the spike protein from the vaccine wasn’t in the vaccine-supposedly the vaccine trained our DNA to create it!

Expand full comment