AND had resident return last week after sent to ER for eval for possible UTI, had diarrhea. WT ACTUAL FUCK still testing WITH NO SYMPTOMS!! triggered a "covid protocol" at the nursing home. About to report this fucking place for MEDICARE FRAUD for unnecessary testing!
There never was or is today a genuine test for any of the coronaviruses and the use of the PCR test was always a fraud as confirmed by the inventor and Nobel prize winner Dr Kary Mullis.
The most senior doctor at Berlins Charity Hospital, Dr Drosden agreed until the WHO decided to encourage him to change his mind and say that the polymerase chain reaction was suitable. PCR is used and is only suitable for DNA analysis and cannot be used for any viral search.
To add to the fraud the other test using the Natural Flow test was equally misleading giving the impression that infection was present. But the question remains why were we all looking for such a minor infection that if caught gave the recipient a 98.88% chance of survival?
Thanks. Have you got a source for "Dr Drosden agreed until the WHO decided to encourage him to change his mind and say that the polymerase chain reaction was suitable."?
“The method is so sensitive that it can detect a single genetic molecule of the virus. If, for example, such a pathogen scurries over the nasal mucous membrane of a nurse for a day without becoming ill or noticing anything, then it is suddenly a MERS case.
Where previously terminally ill were reported, now suddenly mild cases and people who are actually very healthy are included in the reporting statistics. This could also explain the explosion in the number of cases in Saudi Arabia."
Yes, I have seen that one. I was after some evidence that it was under pressure from the WHO specifically that he changed his position - ie referring to "the WHO decided to encourage him to change his mind".
The reason I mentioned Dr Christian Drosden was because he was considered a very senior doctor who Reiner Fuelmich pointed out very early on as someone that had changed his opinion on the use of the PCR test. As you will know Reiner is languishing in a German jail on trumped up charges because of his work with the Corona Committee. He is considered a threat to many of those that perpetuated the covid myth and as a result is now a political prisoner having been charged on nothing more than a civil matter but is being punished as if a criminal. That is proof alone that the whole covid saga was a sham and anyone that dared to question the fact had to be cancelled and in the case of poor Reiner Fuelmich had to be removed from circulation.
The phrase “genuine test for a genuine virus” suggests a paradigm with a much stronger evidence base for the established virus-disease model than actually appears to be the case.
So there was no novel viral spread and even the government's own narrative admits a 'positive' PCR for 'COVID' is not indicative of being infectious aka 'a spreader' (page-6-https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/926410/Understanding_Cycle_Threshold__Ct__in_SARS-CoV-2_RT-PCR_.pdf ) so the real debate should therefore now be around what WAS killing people (mostly very elderly) in excess from March 2020 in UK and around the world? And in Scotland the official evidence is beyond reasonable doubt what that actually was and yet no one 'outspoken on COVID' (and typically the more popular you are the bigger the silence) really wants to talk about that? This for me is where ALL the sceptics become unstuck even though it's proving them to be correct. There is a real hesitancy or fear even around the consistent application of this evidence to prove said points in these circles. A real no go area as you previouisly pointed out JE when some sanity WAS unleashed on GBN nearly 12 months ago.
I agree that there’s a reluctance to attribute the many deaths of people not expected imminently to die while in hospitals or care homes to killing as a result of extraordinary changes to medical management.
I have long called this pandemic-deaths creation lie what I think it is: medical murder, or murder for short.
What else to call it when, had you asked these same medical staff for their expectations of outcome, had they imposed these methods of medical management a decade earlier, they’d have told you that many deaths would be expected?
Indeed it need not be just one “something”. It could be many “somethings”, with varying levels of severity. Some of the “somethings” might even be harmful even if the majority are not.
A coup d'état using a computer simulation and test kits. And Drosten actually developed the protocol and the primers for it in a cloak-and-dagger operation. He supplied the weapons for this coup d'état, knowingly and willingly, even though he knew that there had never been and never would be a pure isolate anywhere. He said so himself ("difficult to impossible", he merely "believed that this had been achieved for the first time" in China, without checking and using their source).
Meanwhile, in the Conservative 'stronghold' in Alberta, Canada - Lateral Flow (RAT) tests are enough to lock down asymptomatic residents of care homes in 2025.
Two 'Cases' and the whole Unit, Floor/Building locks down for 2 weeks AFTER the last 'Case'.
Good YouTube video. The scam was obvious at the time (2009, the pandemic that never was), but, undaunted, notices in surgeries, clinics and pharmacies for years
afterwards referenced it. The propaganda got good pushback from some in the EU then, including if I remember correctly the Polish Minister for Health, who forthrightly refused to be bamboozled into “vaccinating” her very fortunate electorate.
Also, a technician in I think it was a Czech laboratory headed off a possible crime by testing a delivery of some “flu vaccine” vials and discovering a murderous concoction: all the ferrets died; 72 Kg of the stuff, ripe for distribution and injection.
A test run?? It did mark a noticeable ramping-up of the “ have you had your flu vaccine?” propaganda/ hassling, which continues.
I admire you both for labouring this point that, in theory, there was, potentially, no requirement for any new virus allegedly spreading around world in the first quarter of 2020.
I still think there was though, which is significant, in that it gives that kernel of experienced 'truth' that many people latched onto, from their own experience.
During February of that year I spent 48 hours feeling feverish and weird, like I had never experienced before, associated with mild upper respiratory symptoms. That was it (Covid) for me, notable and unusual, though insignificant.
Then during April and early May of that year, as a general medical nurse working in hospital with acutely ill respiratory patients, I experienced, briefly, the most notable winter respiratory winter season of my 35 years as a general nurse.
True, it might have been because they had delayed getting the hospital treatment that they needed, but I have never seen as many people under 60 needing oxygen therapy and IV antibiotics as at that time, though they generally recovered (and I recall ninety something year olds being discharged to handclapping, as if they were miraculous heroes, when they'd just responded to treatment).
After that, and especially the following winter season (2020-2021) it was obviously being exaggerated for the benefit of hysteria/Narrative - there was nothing unusual happening in hospitals that second winter.
Still agree that most of it was confected, just that there was initially just about enough substance there to fool people that it was some much bigger.
I have to ask why you believe there was a virus to blame for your symptoms. I agree with everything else you wrote. no need to respond, obviously, but at least contemplate why you would assign your symptoms to a virus. Said another way, does your faith in virus come from?
It's like I said to my daughter - it's not that people don't get sick...it's that the things called viruses have not been shown to be the cause/a cause.
In the Second Key in your other article, the specificity study shows genes E and N2 are clearly unsuitable. Surely the consequence of that study should have been to exclude those two genes from all future tests. Are you saying that was not done? The same data set you reproduce is saying all other genes had no issues - why not use those? Confused.
AND had resident return last week after sent to ER for eval for possible UTI, had diarrhea. WT ACTUAL FUCK still testing WITH NO SYMPTOMS!! triggered a "covid protocol" at the nursing home. About to report this fucking place for MEDICARE FRAUD for unnecessary testing!
There never was or is today a genuine test for any of the coronaviruses and the use of the PCR test was always a fraud as confirmed by the inventor and Nobel prize winner Dr Kary Mullis.
The most senior doctor at Berlins Charity Hospital, Dr Drosden agreed until the WHO decided to encourage him to change his mind and say that the polymerase chain reaction was suitable. PCR is used and is only suitable for DNA analysis and cannot be used for any viral search.
To add to the fraud the other test using the Natural Flow test was equally misleading giving the impression that infection was present. But the question remains why were we all looking for such a minor infection that if caught gave the recipient a 98.88% chance of survival?
Thanks. Have you got a source for "Dr Drosden agreed until the WHO decided to encourage him to change his mind and say that the polymerase chain reaction was suitable."?
The reference is from a 2014 interview:
“The method is so sensitive that it can detect a single genetic molecule of the virus. If, for example, such a pathogen scurries over the nasal mucous membrane of a nurse for a day without becoming ill or noticing anything, then it is suddenly a MERS case.
Where previously terminally ill were reported, now suddenly mild cases and people who are actually very healthy are included in the reporting statistics. This could also explain the explosion in the number of cases in Saudi Arabia."
https://www.info-direkt.eu/corona/altes-interview-aufgetaucht-drosten-hielt-pcr-tests-fuer-untauglich
Yes, I have seen that one. I was after some evidence that it was under pressure from the WHO specifically that he changed his position - ie referring to "the WHO decided to encourage him to change his mind".
If it's just an inference, that's fine too...
The reason I mentioned Dr Christian Drosden was because he was considered a very senior doctor who Reiner Fuelmich pointed out very early on as someone that had changed his opinion on the use of the PCR test. As you will know Reiner is languishing in a German jail on trumped up charges because of his work with the Corona Committee. He is considered a threat to many of those that perpetuated the covid myth and as a result is now a political prisoner having been charged on nothing more than a civil matter but is being punished as if a criminal. That is proof alone that the whole covid saga was a sham and anyone that dared to question the fact had to be cancelled and in the case of poor Reiner Fuelmich had to be removed from circulation.
Agreed, and/but how could there ever be a genuine test for a genuine virus?
The phrase “genuine test for a genuine virus” suggests a paradigm with a much stronger evidence base for the established virus-disease model than actually appears to be the case.
https://sanityunleashed.substack.com/p/re-visiting-harts-virus-model-statement
Only government bullshit was spreading.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2020/11/04/breaking-news-second-lockdown/
The testing was always random and not controlled in any event.
So there was no novel viral spread and even the government's own narrative admits a 'positive' PCR for 'COVID' is not indicative of being infectious aka 'a spreader' (page-6-https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/926410/Understanding_Cycle_Threshold__Ct__in_SARS-CoV-2_RT-PCR_.pdf ) so the real debate should therefore now be around what WAS killing people (mostly very elderly) in excess from March 2020 in UK and around the world? And in Scotland the official evidence is beyond reasonable doubt what that actually was and yet no one 'outspoken on COVID' (and typically the more popular you are the bigger the silence) really wants to talk about that? This for me is where ALL the sceptics become unstuck even though it's proving them to be correct. There is a real hesitancy or fear even around the consistent application of this evidence to prove said points in these circles. A real no go area as you previouisly pointed out JE when some sanity WAS unleashed on GBN nearly 12 months ago.
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiryclosing
https://substack.com/@scottishcovidinquiry/note/c-112469287
I agree that there’s a reluctance to attribute the many deaths of people not expected imminently to die while in hospitals or care homes to killing as a result of extraordinary changes to medical management.
I have long called this pandemic-deaths creation lie what I think it is: medical murder, or murder for short.
What else to call it when, had you asked these same medical staff for their expectations of outcome, had they imposed these methods of medical management a decade earlier, they’d have told you that many deaths would be expected?
🚔WITHOUT A COVID CASE - ALL THE NARRATIVES COLLAPSE.
Counting Cars or Counting Test Kits.
In March 2020, I put together a video showing how COVID-19 Case numbers were manipulated through testing.
THIS IS HOW THEY HAVE CONTROLLED EVERYTHING FROM THE START.
In 2024 I have used AI tools to update the message about the fundamental COVID lie.
Welcome - Counting Cars or Counting Test Kits
0:40 - Part 1: The Lie of Perception – Creating Safety or Control?
1:54 - Part 2: Manufacturing Offenders – When Systems Fail
3:22 - Part 3: The Cash Cow – When Punishment Doesn’t Prevent Crime
4:08 - Part 4: Replace Cars with Test Kits – The Pandemic of Case Counts
5:07 - Part 5: The Ripple Effect – False Cases, Real Consequences
6:02 - Part 6: The Consequences of a False Narrative
6:44 - Conclusion: It was never about safety - It was about CONTROL
END
https://x.com/dksdata/status/1848914896395640994
I like that. Thanks. Hadn't seen it before.
The original video from March 2020 is here. This made a mockery of the testing and didn't even factor in the tests were/are fundamentally flawed.
https://x.com/dksdata/status/1745553064805945399
Indeed it need not be just one “something”. It could be many “somethings”, with varying levels of severity. Some of the “somethings” might even be harmful even if the majority are not.
A coup d'état using a computer simulation and test kits. And Drosten actually developed the protocol and the primers for it in a cloak-and-dagger operation. He supplied the weapons for this coup d'état, knowingly and willingly, even though he knew that there had never been and never would be a pure isolate anywhere. He said so himself ("difficult to impossible", he merely "believed that this had been achieved for the first time" in China, without checking and using their source).
Spot on. The perpetrators had been rehearsing such a coup for decades beforehand.
They used tabletop simulation of events which had never happened & cannot happen. This is evidence of malice aforethought.
Meanwhile, in the Conservative 'stronghold' in Alberta, Canada - Lateral Flow (RAT) tests are enough to lock down asymptomatic residents of care homes in 2025.
Two 'Cases' and the whole Unit, Floor/Building locks down for 2 weeks AFTER the last 'Case'.
Death by design continues behind closed doors.
https://x.com/dksdata/status/1916962509183193246
Good YouTube video. The scam was obvious at the time (2009, the pandemic that never was), but, undaunted, notices in surgeries, clinics and pharmacies for years
afterwards referenced it. The propaganda got good pushback from some in the EU then, including if I remember correctly the Polish Minister for Health, who forthrightly refused to be bamboozled into “vaccinating” her very fortunate electorate.
Also, a technician in I think it was a Czech laboratory headed off a possible crime by testing a delivery of some “flu vaccine” vials and discovering a murderous concoction: all the ferrets died; 72 Kg of the stuff, ripe for distribution and injection.
A test run?? It did mark a noticeable ramping-up of the “ have you had your flu vaccine?” propaganda/ hassling, which continues.
I admire you both for labouring this point that, in theory, there was, potentially, no requirement for any new virus allegedly spreading around world in the first quarter of 2020.
I still think there was though, which is significant, in that it gives that kernel of experienced 'truth' that many people latched onto, from their own experience.
During February of that year I spent 48 hours feeling feverish and weird, like I had never experienced before, associated with mild upper respiratory symptoms. That was it (Covid) for me, notable and unusual, though insignificant.
Then during April and early May of that year, as a general medical nurse working in hospital with acutely ill respiratory patients, I experienced, briefly, the most notable winter respiratory winter season of my 35 years as a general nurse.
True, it might have been because they had delayed getting the hospital treatment that they needed, but I have never seen as many people under 60 needing oxygen therapy and IV antibiotics as at that time, though they generally recovered (and I recall ninety something year olds being discharged to handclapping, as if they were miraculous heroes, when they'd just responded to treatment).
After that, and especially the following winter season (2020-2021) it was obviously being exaggerated for the benefit of hysteria/Narrative - there was nothing unusual happening in hospitals that second winter.
Still agree that most of it was confected, just that there was initially just about enough substance there to fool people that it was some much bigger.
I have to ask why you believe there was a virus to blame for your symptoms. I agree with everything else you wrote. no need to respond, obviously, but at least contemplate why you would assign your symptoms to a virus. Said another way, does your faith in virus come from?
Right.
It's like I said to my daughter - it's not that people don't get sick...it's that the things called viruses have not been shown to be the cause/a cause.
https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/do-you-believe-in-viruses-yes-or
"I have never seen as many people under 60 needing oxygen therapy and IV antibiotics as at that time"
If you don't mind my asking, where are you located?
If you get covid twice - call the police!
nno virus no lab lleakno bats all bulshit
ov cours e nonnew vitius not lableak no batsallbulshit
Sidenote: Ragnar Danneskjöld is a character in Atlas Shrugged. Less known than John Galt. But who is John Galt ?
In the Second Key in your other article, the specificity study shows genes E and N2 are clearly unsuitable. Surely the consequence of that study should have been to exclude those two genes from all future tests. Are you saying that was not done? The same data set you reproduce is saying all other genes had no issues - why not use those? Confused.