10 Comments
Jun 4Liked by Jonathan Engler

Surely the procurement of excessive amounts of these dubious drugs in advance of the outbreak (2019) shows planned intent? Then you see that Hancock was (is?) shareholder of/associated personally with the suppliers of same.. I would say that is the smoking gun!

I have seen evidence of this through a variety other journalistic research which I’m sure could be verified again through NHS unless of course now scrubbed along with their killer protocol.

Expand full comment
Jun 4Liked by Jonathan Engler

Correct.

Expand full comment
author

I didn't really cover anything there about advanced procurment - can you provide some links please, inc to the Hancock point.

Expand full comment
Jun 4Liked by Jonathan Engler

A guest on Maajid Nawaz’s programme, I believe a former NHS pharmacist, had the receipts on unusual alterations in purchasing & dispensing records in 2018 & 2019, which I regard as a smoking gun. I’m referring to midazolam as injection presentations. They were stockpiled

Expand full comment
Jun 4Liked by Jonathan Engler

I have seen several investigators point to excessive procurement through NHS records. Not sure whether it involved FOI requests but they stated it was well over the expected/normal trend of orders. Will try and re-research.

Expand full comment
author

Would be great if you could help - I am becoming overwhelmed by this!

Expand full comment
Jun 4Liked by Jonathan Engler

Yes.

Most people reading your article, Jonathan, have long realised that we’re lied to extensively.

In the case of the “covid pandemic”, I’m convinced that the only moving parts were propaganda, Iatrogenecity, knowingly useless PCR based diagnostics and intentionally harmful non-vaccine injections.

Expand full comment
Jun 7·edited Jun 7

There is another explanation for Covid, but you might not like it.

It's invariably dismissed by the hysterics and sceptics alike as being completely implausible, despite the fact that we have countless examples of this phenomenon having occurred before, the most famous and well known, being the medieval witch trials. With Dartmouth Hitchcock we have evidence of the PCR being 0% accurate and, to make matters worse, being 0% accurate at even being able to detect bacteria (pertussis) theoretically much easier for the PCR to detect than a virus.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/how-soap-opera-virus-felled-hundreds-students-portugal-180962383/

https://www.bleadon.org.uk/media/other/24400/FaithinQuickTestLeadstoEpidemicThatWasnt-TheNewYorkTimes.pdf

I believe this was a mass psychosis outbreak that started, quickly spread and flourished, in the medical profession. So trusted and respected are the Doctors that it was thought inconceivable that they could all go, simultaneously, insane over an imaginary virus.

"You mean to tell me that ALL the Doctors, All over the world, went mad mistaking flu as a deadly virus and then killed all these people?" is the usual response and my response is still the same, yes they did.

Mass Psychosis does not mean that the doctors ripped off their clothes and ran down the street naked. They remained, outwardly, the same but their perception of this illness had become so distorted through irrational fear that data was ignored or excused, the rulebook went out of the window and they embarked on a quest to find a 'cure' (initially ventilation) for this virus based on the most dubious of evidence. interventions turned out to be extremely deadly for many of those unfortunates in hospital at the time, it being well known that in some hospitals the fatality rate was 90%.

The most damaging human symptom that emerges in a MP outbreak is confirmation bias. So the ventilator deaths were simply put down to the lethality of Covid and confirmed the doctors belief that they correct identifying Covid as a deadly disease when the data (ignored) was showing it only needed a Lemsip. Misdiagnosis by confirmation bias was conjuring Covid patients where none actually existed. The 'happy hypoxics' have a perfectly rational explanation, hyperventilation from a panic attack.

If you think that's ludicrous bare in mind that this large study at the end of 2020 gave the 2nd biggest risk factor (after obesity) for dying in hospital of Covid was Anxiety. Yes, apparently having this MENTAL condition gave people a staggering 30% chance of not coming out of the hospital alive. Of course it’s absurd. A repiratory virus cannot identify someone with a mental condition. The real reason was they were ventilating panic attacks believing them to be severe Covid because hyperventilation actually causes oxygen desaturation. So all the requirements of the Happy Hypoxic are met, breathing difficulties, oxygen desaturation and no fever and they were then marched off to the ventilator to be pre-emptively ventilated before the inevitable ‘cytokine storm’.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34197283/

Luckily, mass psychosis outbreaks are temporary and sense eventually returns. The first Covid spike in early 2020 is not an indication of covid deaths but a graphical representation of hysteria in the medical profession. The second spike, late 2020 was a re-emergence of the hysteria (combined with the start of the vax deaths) but not on the scale of early 2020.

The problem with the hypothesis that this was a Mass psychosis outbreak is that it is opposed, obviously, by the hysterics but equally by the sceptics. The hysterics have invested everything into maintaining that Covid is real and deadly and the sceptics have invested everything into it being a conspiracy or plandemic. Neither side is willing, or able, to move due to the time, effort and research they’ve done to prove their position. Everyone doing an about face is still unlikely but I believe that the further Covid recedes in the past the more it will become clear what it really was, group madness. I do have one advantage though, I've done 23 years on a frontline Ambulance and was actually there seeing it all unfold before my eyes. Unfortunately I'm only a glorified taxi driver in the eyes of the hysterics and sceptics but, as the saying goes, 'in the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king'

To the sceptics it's even more heresy to suggest that the doctors and politicians were, technically, not responsible for their actions as they were ill themselves with a devastating mind virus.

What I think the sceptics are forgetting though is that proving they went mad over an imaginary virus would be a far more devastating weapon to have in their arsenal. The people responsible would be hit hardest where it hurts, their reputations, their credibility and their ego's. Imagine the ridicule that they would suffer as a result?

Surely that’s worth at least considering this alternative explanation?

Expand full comment

Yes. The evidence was clear as it was happening if you spend time in ‘health groups’. There desperate families and whistleblowers shared the truth but with media blackouts and social media brainwashing it was beyond difficult to speak openly or ask questions, never mind saving anyone!

Expand full comment

Indirectly related: https://x.com/Wood_House76/status/1691930950563680742

I had forgotten about this case...

Expand full comment