The reason is likely to be the narrative that mRNA technology involves. Specifically, the mRNA 'platform' is supposed to be able to produce an infinite variety of new injections for new problems with little to no additional testing. This is the necessary myth that opens the way to immense profit and long-term access to billions of bodies.
Under the old vaccine conceptual regime, there was a perceived need for lengthy test periods (although in reality there was no real safety testing at all.) Under the new mRNA narrative concept, new injections can be introduced at 'Warp Speed' for any imaginable illness or condition, as fast as a media marketing campaign can be gotten together to spread fear. All of these new injectables are deemed safe by regulatory authorities because they carry the stamp of mRNA narrative.
As I've discovered over the last few years, neither the previous injections nor the new ones have ever had any real use for protecting people from illness. Once we put aside the idea that there was some positive health endpoint and rid ourselves of the false belief that anyone in regulatory or pharma cares about safety, the real difference stands out: one set of products takes years to introduce and the other can be deemed safe immediately.
Yes money, it really is the root of all evil. Also the opportunity handed to them on a silver platter to have a worldwide experiment of their mRNA platform.
As a person who spent my entire career in commercial R&D in big pharma including Pfizer (where I was responsible for global research and early clinical development for experimental therapeutics for allergic & respiratory diseases) as well as in biotech (where I both founded and led a company as CEO & also consulted to over 30 biotechs and small pharma), I am steeped in the “rational drug design” method.
I also, unusually, have a formal training in “mechanistic toxicology”, the field in which the ways foreign substances can cause harm are elucidated and used to “teach away from” using certain design principles in order to reduce or eliminate unanticipated human toxicity.
This combination of training and commercial experience in a single therapeutic area is unusual in the industry. Most senior people move from their original field of expertise in order to “gain breadth”, often seen as a requisite to be further promoted. Unfortunately the effect of this is to ensure that very few senior leaders in big pharma really understand what is going on in the departments below them and in their laboratories. It’s convenient because it makes plausible deniability so easy and plausible. I declined such career advice and was more than content to “plateau” at vice president level. I could have gone further (witness my ability to succeed in biotech both as a consultant and as a CEO) but I was actively against being promoted to my level of incompetence.
With that as background, I was several times laid out how the declared composition of the do-called “vaccines” can ONLY have arisen through a conscious, deliberate attempt to cause injuries to a proportion of those who received them.
Any single person can “make a mistake”. However, this isn’t how new drugs get into development. Anyone who’s worked in commercial R&D knows every idea & every assumption gets tested continually by your peers, line discipline experts (including those in the drug safety evaluation department, previously called toxicology or toxicity testing).
So I’m telling you that it’s impossible for one OBVIOUS “mistake” to get out of the lab & in humans. Choosing the underlying technology as described by Dr Jonathan Engler here is one such decision. There wasn’t a good reason to choose it. In my opinion all mRNA based products will be dangerous. That’s inherent in making a persons body manufacture non-self, or foreign proteins.
Another “mistake” was in selecting a known toxic protein, so-called “spike protein” for the mRNA to encode. Don’t be mislead by the name. The name is arbitrary and does not imply a viral source. It could be completely synthetic or from a surprising source. That closely related sequences of amino acids were known to be harmful to mammalian biology was known before 2020.
Another “mistake” was choosing to formulate the product in lipid nano particles (LNPs). These were known for over a decade to facilitate distribution of the formulated “payload” widely throughout the body. This is inherently undesirable. The components of the LNPs were also widely known to be both unapproved in medicinal preparations and the reason for this is that they possess various toxicities. But it gets worse. LNPs are also widely known to lead to accumulation of the payload into visceral organs, in particular, the ovaries.
There are many more “mistakes”. Another is that all four leading companies (Pfizer / BioNTech; Moderna; J&J & AstraZeneca) adopted precisely the same basic design principles. Two used mRNA & two used DNA, but otherwise extraordinarily similar designs. I know from prior experience that we never would do this. Firstly, and from a commercial perspective, if you’re essentially duplicating someone else’s product, one at least is going to get discarded because it’ll lack an feature, however trivial, that the other has. Or, possesses a weakness that the other lacks. It’s very unlikely to be a good idea to be so similar. The strategic reason is that your product is highly likely to have similar flaws. So if, for example, it wasn’t previously known that “spike protein” was toxic & could prompt blood coagulation or cause damage to neurones, the discovery of such properties would kill off all four products at a stroke. The similarities are, in my opinion and experience, highly suggestive either of collusion, or the entire multi company publicity was a deception. I’ve long thought it possible that there were only two products (mRNA & DNA) and that the plan was to kill off the latter. If this is what happened, the pharma companies are merely window dressing what was ordered by the Department of Defense.
There are yet more “mistakes”. I’m telling you that there’s not one shred of uncertainty here. There are multiple, independent, unnecessary and (to me and my peers) obvious mechanisms of toxicity, deliberately built into these molecules.
Someone or some small group was tasked with accomplishing something & it wasn’t merely making money. They could have used medical saline and made exactly the same money. That something was clearly to injure, to kill & to reduce fertility in survivors. These preparations were then, reportedly, administered to most of the people on the planet. A low single figure % of those into whom they were injected have died & a higher % are now unwell, many of them chronically. Of those, more are going to die earlier than they otherwise would have. We’re not going to know for some time how this all shakes out. I think this is arguable well up in the list of the worst ever crimes against humanity.
Great article, thank you! Small point: the media wants us to believe these are mRNA shots but they aren’t exactly. They are MODIFIED mRNA shots ie MODeRNA, very different bc now we’re almost all gmo’d (thank you shedding), even before any DNA contamination is considered. GMO organisms/plants can be patented, but naturally occurring ones cannot 🤔. Nuremberg 2.0 is coming - Hey, we built a play swing for all you big pharma/military evil-doers (it just 👀 like a noose).
I am convinced that the “depopulation agenda” is now in full swing and the mRNA technology is a big part of it. The “Day Tapes” are the key to understanding what has long been planned for the world population. Sage Hana’s Substack has many links and discussions about the Day Tapes. As far as the “follow the money” part of it, I believe that we (taxpayers) are now funding our own demise - since you can’t expect the perpetrators of this depopulation agenda to fund the whole thing out of their own fortunes.
Yep, it's a racket (and an experiment/ control mechanism) that's justified by the 'biodefense' agenda - ie. the new military-industrial (pharma) complex based on the need for "medical countermeasures for national security" against 'biothreats' (whether naturally occurring, accidentally released or deliberately deployed according to their hype). 'Covid' was a "live exercise" test consistent with the Pentagon's P3 Program (to "stop a pandemic in 60 days" with medical countermeasures).
In their defense S&T fantasies, mRNA is the platform that allows "bug to drug" or "lab to jab" within as little as 48 hours... to protect civilians and warfighters! "Public health" was a front for the military/ 'national security' response. A few links...
- Academic paper (UK) from 2015 on medical countermeasures (MCMs) for national security:
- Two minute video from June 2019, about what the DoD calls "medical rapid response" to 'biothreats' for fast-tracked MCMs, including regulatory authorization.
This. "I don’t believe there was a novel virus causing a pandemic of a novel disease, and thus there was never any justification for any novel treatments or vaccines."
I think I might finally be understanding the nuance that you (and Jessica, among others) have been trying to communicate with your "no pandemic" stance. I find NOTHING with which to disagree in the statement quoted above. However, as one of those people who almost always believes following the money leads to the answer, I believe further insight is necessary.
For instance, I believe so-called "alternative treatments" such as IVM and hydroxychloroquine WERE attacked, directly and tellingly. This is not because they were vital in saving lives against the (non-existent) novel virus capable of killing everyone on earth. It was because their existence--and the POSSIBILITY that they could be positioned as even pseudo-viable alternatives--threatened the ability to position mRNA [non-]vaccines as both necessary and unique.
Spoiler Alert: no pandemic => no need for anything, including NPIs or treatments of any kind, but pandemic + no alternative treatments => huge money-maker, given ability to mandate!
It is useful to keep in mind that in June 2020, Moderna issued this statement to their stakeholders:
"No mRNA drug has been approved in this new potential class of medicines, and may never be approved as a result of efforts by others or us. mRNA drug development has substantial clinical development and regulatory risks due to the novel and unprecedented nature of this new class of medicines." (Pg 69)
In other words, without the emergency use authorization given out to the covid injections, it is unlikely that mRNA would have been approved in the foreseeable future (except for extreme high risk health issues like terminal cancer).
Thus, we might ask: Did they stage/fake/exaggerate a "pandemic" solely to obtain EUA, so they could bring mRNA into mainstream medicine? Whether or not someone did this intentionally, it is most certainly what happened.
When people starting emitting bluetooth codes in 2021 it was like a huge puzzle piece of the jigsaw was put in its place.
IMO there is a horrific dark secret to these injections. That they contain very advanced cutting edge nanotechnology and form a fully operational nano devise(s) in human bodies.
This would explain their absolute insane attempt to get a 95% + uptake, which thankfully they failed to do. In the UK it was only 70%, not enough to bring in permanent vaccine passports and digital ID that went with them.
And they only had one chance at the vaccine route, they will never get 70% uptake again now, they blew it.
But that still leaves the nanotech issue. There have been many studies showing these strange self assembling nano objects by various people/groups all around the world.
And anyone with an android phone can verify that people are emitting random unknown bluetooth MAC addresses. This is a screen recording from my phone last week of kids at rugby practice. https://go.screenpal.com/watch/cZQrlKVS0GW
If you have an android phone, you need to turn on the bluetooth setting "Show devices without a name" It has been moved to the developer menu in 2021 (funny that). It takes 2 mins to access this menu and turn on "Show bluetooth devices without a name" see this YT video (works for all android models https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMitXA6H3aI
Once its on, if you do a bluetooth search wherever people are about, you will see these strange codes come up in front of your eyes.
And before people say "These codes are mobiles or headphones"
They are not, mobile phones only display their bluetooth name when in pairing mode and for 2 mins only. And any headsets etc would say "samsung headset" or "Apple airpods". etc
Otherwise when you want to pair your new headphones, how would you know which one of the 70 random MAC codes was your headphones lol
Good points, though my fear is that the reason that mRNA tech was chosen is because of time, and not necessarily money. On 28 Feb 2020, before even 100 "COVID deaths" outside of China, Bill Gates predicted a once-in-a-century pandemic [ PMID: 32109012 ].
He said it will become important to throw out prior pharmacovigilance standards and to adopt new methods allowing for new drug ("vaccine") approvals in 3 months or less -- rather than having to wait the normal 3-4 years for approvals -- i.e., a wait period which prior safety monitoring had proven to be a necessary wait period in order to uncover latent adverse effects from new vaccines (e.g., Dengue vaccine harmed people in the 3rd year).
In other words, if they get to make new vaccines every 90 days, and if we need to get new injections every 90 days (to travel or dine in public, or whatever), then they can control whole societies.
Ypu have unwittingly uncovered the biggest secret to all of it. Namely: the entire planet spent all the time talking about antibodies. Like you, no mention of T cells.
You did say "the immune system attacks and destroys". THAT is the most important facts of all. But you and all experts refuse to talk about killer T cells destroying those cells.
Some phenomeon has made the entire planet fucking stupid as hell, and experts and the public alike simply can't talk about killer T cells destroying. About 6 of us experts repeatedly tried to educate ate you in all cases, 100% of you listening simply ignore us. Over and over.
In reality, the t cells were always going to destroy organs , it was obvious, the planet had a whole year to mention this, and you all still can't.
Dr bhakdi and Dr Arne Burkhart proved it in 2021, it's three years later and ypu all still couldn't agree on the colour of shite. Some phenomeon is makeing you all blind to the most important facts. I'll happily face all of your famous experts together and point out easily how totally fucking dumb ass they have all been.
This was an extremely focused piece making one point. I've discussed natural immunity elsewhere.
I agree the obsession on antibodies is insane.
But wouldn't it be better to familiarise yourself with the breadth of what an author is saying rather than come on and attack them for a short piece which (inevitably) doesn't cover everything you want it to cover?
In this piece I even say there was no novel virus at all, so what is the relevance of an antibody / T cell discussion? Nothing was needed AT ALL. The entire pandemic was a scam.
The point made here was focused on the fact that THEY said they wanted to stimulate an antigenic response and there were safer ways of doing that than the way they chose.
No I don't think it would be better for me to familiarise myself with all of your work. I cover an extensive volume of people's work and opinions and in all cases I analyse their ability to discuss the most critical fact of all. That the very function of the mRNA making cells express foreign proteins invokes a destructive response. Cytotoxic, and that in 2020 , no grown up thinking adults or scientists bothered to mention that. Then for 3 years of a lunatic mass focused investigation on harms, I observe who can and cannot detail the cause, aka the cd8+ killer t cells responding and destroying the cells. In 3 years about 6 infuencial experts have got the details right, about 30 have worded "the immune system attacks/destroys" which is a correct answer but an infantile one avoiding details, ..and the rest of the planet, 99.9% of docotrs and investigators, still Avent even gone that far. Everybody has been incapable of seeing the logical obvious mechanism of harm.
So what's best for me is provoking people and challenging them on that point, then I observe their reaction as 99% refuse to talk about it in a scientific manner, but instead get hostile and critical...or lose the ability to communicate altogether. This mass shitty behaviour has kept the entire planet totally clueless to how mRNA is destroying people's organs , brains and hearts, and doctors still can't even find the answers in pathology.
It appears that you anticipate that the modRNA will always be correctly read at the ribosomes and will consequently produce exactly those peptides and proteines that were intended.
Always and 100%
Do you have any proove that the assumption of correct reading is true?
Agreed. When "spike" is said to be found it is highly likely that there are many other proteins also created, it's just that they only look for spike. The effects of such proteins are unknown but they aren't going to be beneficial, and almost certainly they would be pro-inflammatory.
I did a very short piece on framshifting here - asking who knew what, when?
Hiya, i don't believe that there is any viable mRNA in the vials transported around the country: in and out of fridges and freezers. I don't think any proteins, 'frameshifted' or otherwise, is translated by being injected with the jabs.
It stands to reason that p180-200 (aka the 'spike protein) is found after injection as it is likely to be a cellular protein involved in the inflammatory response and in detoxification.
As regards antibodies to it- it's true that many specific antibodies to proteins are produced by mammals, this is a way of detecting 'foreign' proteins and managing them. However, antibodies are also produced to cellular, pro-inflammatory proteins (mistakenly thought to be viral proteins) in the recovery phase of a healing event, in up to 30 times the base line titre, to return the body to homeostasis after the detox fever. This has given rise to the mistaken notion that antibodies are somehow involved in remembering 'infections'.
Unfortunately the Mulroney-paper occurred in Nature.
I, however, do not trust anymore anything published in Nature that is anyhow related to C19 or these vaccines. For me, Nature is as reliable regarding these themes as the NYT on Biden / Harris or the German BILD on Israel / Gaza.
So why should Nature have pubilshed a paper that points to fundamental ciriticism of the modRNA stuff?
Prof Ulrike Kämmerer told me on these issues in 2022. She is still underway getting her respective research published.
For me (not being biologist) it's that simple:
1. Apart from few exotic compounds, only 5 nucleosides are used in nature, from seaweed, trees, worms, elephants to human guinea-pigs. Everything is functioning well with these five.
2. The N1MPsU ist artificial, never occurred in nature.
3. If we (or "they") outwit the RNases, then we must also get some untoward effects on the ribosomes. This is because these five nucleosides are so fundamental. Fools may think that this would be totally different and independent issues. And business-minded people will make us think that the one issue has nothing at all to do with the other and that there would or could be a way to dissoble this dilemma..
However, I am convinced that no modRNA is thinkable that has resistance against RNases and that nevertheless perfectly works as natural RNA does.
This means: modRNA product are per se nonsense. Independent from the kind of vaccine, and, as to my opinion, also useless as therapeutic products.
The reason is likely to be the narrative that mRNA technology involves. Specifically, the mRNA 'platform' is supposed to be able to produce an infinite variety of new injections for new problems with little to no additional testing. This is the necessary myth that opens the way to immense profit and long-term access to billions of bodies.
Under the old vaccine conceptual regime, there was a perceived need for lengthy test periods (although in reality there was no real safety testing at all.) Under the new mRNA narrative concept, new injections can be introduced at 'Warp Speed' for any imaginable illness or condition, as fast as a media marketing campaign can be gotten together to spread fear. All of these new injectables are deemed safe by regulatory authorities because they carry the stamp of mRNA narrative.
As I've discovered over the last few years, neither the previous injections nor the new ones have ever had any real use for protecting people from illness. Once we put aside the idea that there was some positive health endpoint and rid ourselves of the false belief that anyone in regulatory or pharma cares about safety, the real difference stands out: one set of products takes years to introduce and the other can be deemed safe immediately.
Great summary!
Yep, money.
Yes money, it really is the root of all evil. Also the opportunity handed to them on a silver platter to have a worldwide experiment of their mRNA platform.
As a person who spent my entire career in commercial R&D in big pharma including Pfizer (where I was responsible for global research and early clinical development for experimental therapeutics for allergic & respiratory diseases) as well as in biotech (where I both founded and led a company as CEO & also consulted to over 30 biotechs and small pharma), I am steeped in the “rational drug design” method.
I also, unusually, have a formal training in “mechanistic toxicology”, the field in which the ways foreign substances can cause harm are elucidated and used to “teach away from” using certain design principles in order to reduce or eliminate unanticipated human toxicity.
This combination of training and commercial experience in a single therapeutic area is unusual in the industry. Most senior people move from their original field of expertise in order to “gain breadth”, often seen as a requisite to be further promoted. Unfortunately the effect of this is to ensure that very few senior leaders in big pharma really understand what is going on in the departments below them and in their laboratories. It’s convenient because it makes plausible deniability so easy and plausible. I declined such career advice and was more than content to “plateau” at vice president level. I could have gone further (witness my ability to succeed in biotech both as a consultant and as a CEO) but I was actively against being promoted to my level of incompetence.
With that as background, I was several times laid out how the declared composition of the do-called “vaccines” can ONLY have arisen through a conscious, deliberate attempt to cause injuries to a proportion of those who received them.
Any single person can “make a mistake”. However, this isn’t how new drugs get into development. Anyone who’s worked in commercial R&D knows every idea & every assumption gets tested continually by your peers, line discipline experts (including those in the drug safety evaluation department, previously called toxicology or toxicity testing).
So I’m telling you that it’s impossible for one OBVIOUS “mistake” to get out of the lab & in humans. Choosing the underlying technology as described by Dr Jonathan Engler here is one such decision. There wasn’t a good reason to choose it. In my opinion all mRNA based products will be dangerous. That’s inherent in making a persons body manufacture non-self, or foreign proteins.
Another “mistake” was in selecting a known toxic protein, so-called “spike protein” for the mRNA to encode. Don’t be mislead by the name. The name is arbitrary and does not imply a viral source. It could be completely synthetic or from a surprising source. That closely related sequences of amino acids were known to be harmful to mammalian biology was known before 2020.
Another “mistake” was choosing to formulate the product in lipid nano particles (LNPs). These were known for over a decade to facilitate distribution of the formulated “payload” widely throughout the body. This is inherently undesirable. The components of the LNPs were also widely known to be both unapproved in medicinal preparations and the reason for this is that they possess various toxicities. But it gets worse. LNPs are also widely known to lead to accumulation of the payload into visceral organs, in particular, the ovaries.
There are many more “mistakes”. Another is that all four leading companies (Pfizer / BioNTech; Moderna; J&J & AstraZeneca) adopted precisely the same basic design principles. Two used mRNA & two used DNA, but otherwise extraordinarily similar designs. I know from prior experience that we never would do this. Firstly, and from a commercial perspective, if you’re essentially duplicating someone else’s product, one at least is going to get discarded because it’ll lack an feature, however trivial, that the other has. Or, possesses a weakness that the other lacks. It’s very unlikely to be a good idea to be so similar. The strategic reason is that your product is highly likely to have similar flaws. So if, for example, it wasn’t previously known that “spike protein” was toxic & could prompt blood coagulation or cause damage to neurones, the discovery of such properties would kill off all four products at a stroke. The similarities are, in my opinion and experience, highly suggestive either of collusion, or the entire multi company publicity was a deception. I’ve long thought it possible that there were only two products (mRNA & DNA) and that the plan was to kill off the latter. If this is what happened, the pharma companies are merely window dressing what was ordered by the Department of Defense.
There are yet more “mistakes”. I’m telling you that there’s not one shred of uncertainty here. There are multiple, independent, unnecessary and (to me and my peers) obvious mechanisms of toxicity, deliberately built into these molecules.
Someone or some small group was tasked with accomplishing something & it wasn’t merely making money. They could have used medical saline and made exactly the same money. That something was clearly to injure, to kill & to reduce fertility in survivors. These preparations were then, reportedly, administered to most of the people on the planet. A low single figure % of those into whom they were injected have died & a higher % are now unwell, many of them chronically. Of those, more are going to die earlier than they otherwise would have. We’re not going to know for some time how this all shakes out. I think this is arguable well up in the list of the worst ever crimes against humanity.
Great article, thank you! Small point: the media wants us to believe these are mRNA shots but they aren’t exactly. They are MODIFIED mRNA shots ie MODeRNA, very different bc now we’re almost all gmo’d (thank you shedding), even before any DNA contamination is considered. GMO organisms/plants can be patented, but naturally occurring ones cannot 🤔. Nuremberg 2.0 is coming - Hey, we built a play swing for all you big pharma/military evil-doers (it just 👀 like a noose).
I am convinced that the “depopulation agenda” is now in full swing and the mRNA technology is a big part of it. The “Day Tapes” are the key to understanding what has long been planned for the world population. Sage Hana’s Substack has many links and discussions about the Day Tapes. As far as the “follow the money” part of it, I believe that we (taxpayers) are now funding our own demise - since you can’t expect the perpetrators of this depopulation agenda to fund the whole thing out of their own fortunes.
They used mRNA to see if their small sample trial results with genetics manipulation would be replicative as scale
Yep, it's a racket (and an experiment/ control mechanism) that's justified by the 'biodefense' agenda - ie. the new military-industrial (pharma) complex based on the need for "medical countermeasures for national security" against 'biothreats' (whether naturally occurring, accidentally released or deliberately deployed according to their hype). 'Covid' was a "live exercise" test consistent with the Pentagon's P3 Program (to "stop a pandemic in 60 days" with medical countermeasures).
In their defense S&T fantasies, mRNA is the platform that allows "bug to drug" or "lab to jab" within as little as 48 hours... to protect civilians and warfighters! "Public health" was a front for the military/ 'national security' response. A few links...
- Academic paper (UK) from 2015 on medical countermeasures (MCMs) for national security:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953614002664
- Two minute video from June 2019, about what the DoD calls "medical rapid response" to 'biothreats' for fast-tracked MCMs, including regulatory authorization.
https://democracymanifest.substack.com/p/preview-coming-soon
- DARPA- Moderna mobile "DART" = Deployable Accelerated RNA Technology (in army trucks) - 60 second video presentation from 2022
https://democracymanifest.substack.com/p/if-a-new-virus-struck-tomorrow
- US DoD (and DHS) conference on 20 January 2020 about accelerated MCMs for a pandemic!
https://democracymanifest.substack.com/p/dod-from-information-to-injection
- the P3 Program - activated by DoD on 4 February 2020 on 'national security' grounds
https://democracymanifest.substack.com/p/the-pentagons-pandemic-x
- DoD CBRN conference 2024 - biodefense industrial academia complex
https://democracymanifest.substack.com/p/ndia-we-must-act-now
IMO, They want to genetically modify people.
This. "I don’t believe there was a novel virus causing a pandemic of a novel disease, and thus there was never any justification for any novel treatments or vaccines."
I think I might finally be understanding the nuance that you (and Jessica, among others) have been trying to communicate with your "no pandemic" stance. I find NOTHING with which to disagree in the statement quoted above. However, as one of those people who almost always believes following the money leads to the answer, I believe further insight is necessary.
For instance, I believe so-called "alternative treatments" such as IVM and hydroxychloroquine WERE attacked, directly and tellingly. This is not because they were vital in saving lives against the (non-existent) novel virus capable of killing everyone on earth. It was because their existence--and the POSSIBILITY that they could be positioned as even pseudo-viable alternatives--threatened the ability to position mRNA [non-]vaccines as both necessary and unique.
Spoiler Alert: no pandemic => no need for anything, including NPIs or treatments of any kind, but pandemic + no alternative treatments => huge money-maker, given ability to mandate!
#AndHereWeAre
It is useful to keep in mind that in June 2020, Moderna issued this statement to their stakeholders:
"No mRNA drug has been approved in this new potential class of medicines, and may never be approved as a result of efforts by others or us. mRNA drug development has substantial clinical development and regulatory risks due to the novel and unprecedented nature of this new class of medicines." (Pg 69)
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1682852/000168285220000017/mrna-20200630.htm
In other words, without the emergency use authorization given out to the covid injections, it is unlikely that mRNA would have been approved in the foreseeable future (except for extreme high risk health issues like terminal cancer).
Thus, we might ask: Did they stage/fake/exaggerate a "pandemic" solely to obtain EUA, so they could bring mRNA into mainstream medicine? Whether or not someone did this intentionally, it is most certainly what happened.
When people starting emitting bluetooth codes in 2021 it was like a huge puzzle piece of the jigsaw was put in its place.
IMO there is a horrific dark secret to these injections. That they contain very advanced cutting edge nanotechnology and form a fully operational nano devise(s) in human bodies.
This would explain their absolute insane attempt to get a 95% + uptake, which thankfully they failed to do. In the UK it was only 70%, not enough to bring in permanent vaccine passports and digital ID that went with them.
And they only had one chance at the vaccine route, they will never get 70% uptake again now, they blew it.
But that still leaves the nanotech issue. There have been many studies showing these strange self assembling nano objects by various people/groups all around the world.
There have also been a few papers published that sort of touch on the subject, this one that I found goes into great detail about it, v interesting read. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358833772_CoVid_Vaccines_Based_on_Graphene_Nanonetwork_and_Internet_of_NanoThings_IoNT
And anyone with an android phone can verify that people are emitting random unknown bluetooth MAC addresses. This is a screen recording from my phone last week of kids at rugby practice. https://go.screenpal.com/watch/cZQrlKVS0GW
If you have an android phone, you need to turn on the bluetooth setting "Show devices without a name" It has been moved to the developer menu in 2021 (funny that). It takes 2 mins to access this menu and turn on "Show bluetooth devices without a name" see this YT video (works for all android models https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMitXA6H3aI
Once its on, if you do a bluetooth search wherever people are about, you will see these strange codes come up in front of your eyes.
And before people say "These codes are mobiles or headphones"
They are not, mobile phones only display their bluetooth name when in pairing mode and for 2 mins only. And any headsets etc would say "samsung headset" or "Apple airpods". etc
Otherwise when you want to pair your new headphones, how would you know which one of the 70 random MAC codes was your headphones lol
Try it, its very scary when you first see it!
Good points, though my fear is that the reason that mRNA tech was chosen is because of time, and not necessarily money. On 28 Feb 2020, before even 100 "COVID deaths" outside of China, Bill Gates predicted a once-in-a-century pandemic [ PMID: 32109012 ].
He said it will become important to throw out prior pharmacovigilance standards and to adopt new methods allowing for new drug ("vaccine") approvals in 3 months or less -- rather than having to wait the normal 3-4 years for approvals -- i.e., a wait period which prior safety monitoring had proven to be a necessary wait period in order to uncover latent adverse effects from new vaccines (e.g., Dengue vaccine harmed people in the 3rd year).
In other words, if they get to make new vaccines every 90 days, and if we need to get new injections every 90 days (to travel or dine in public, or whatever), then they can control whole societies.
Ypu have unwittingly uncovered the biggest secret to all of it. Namely: the entire planet spent all the time talking about antibodies. Like you, no mention of T cells.
You did say "the immune system attacks and destroys". THAT is the most important facts of all. But you and all experts refuse to talk about killer T cells destroying those cells.
Some phenomeon has made the entire planet fucking stupid as hell, and experts and the public alike simply can't talk about killer T cells destroying. About 6 of us experts repeatedly tried to educate ate you in all cases, 100% of you listening simply ignore us. Over and over.
In reality, the t cells were always going to destroy organs , it was obvious, the planet had a whole year to mention this, and you all still can't.
Dr bhakdi and Dr Arne Burkhart proved it in 2021, it's three years later and ypu all still couldn't agree on the colour of shite. Some phenomeon is makeing you all blind to the most important facts. I'll happily face all of your famous experts together and point out easily how totally fucking dumb ass they have all been.
This was an extremely focused piece making one point. I've discussed natural immunity elsewhere.
I agree the obsession on antibodies is insane.
But wouldn't it be better to familiarise yourself with the breadth of what an author is saying rather than come on and attack them for a short piece which (inevitably) doesn't cover everything you want it to cover?
In this piece I even say there was no novel virus at all, so what is the relevance of an antibody / T cell discussion? Nothing was needed AT ALL. The entire pandemic was a scam.
The point made here was focused on the fact that THEY said they wanted to stimulate an antigenic response and there were safer ways of doing that than the way they chose.
No I don't think it would be better for me to familiarise myself with all of your work. I cover an extensive volume of people's work and opinions and in all cases I analyse their ability to discuss the most critical fact of all. That the very function of the mRNA making cells express foreign proteins invokes a destructive response. Cytotoxic, and that in 2020 , no grown up thinking adults or scientists bothered to mention that. Then for 3 years of a lunatic mass focused investigation on harms, I observe who can and cannot detail the cause, aka the cd8+ killer t cells responding and destroying the cells. In 3 years about 6 infuencial experts have got the details right, about 30 have worded "the immune system attacks/destroys" which is a correct answer but an infantile one avoiding details, ..and the rest of the planet, 99.9% of docotrs and investigators, still Avent even gone that far. Everybody has been incapable of seeing the logical obvious mechanism of harm.
So what's best for me is provoking people and challenging them on that point, then I observe their reaction as 99% refuse to talk about it in a scientific manner, but instead get hostile and critical...or lose the ability to communicate altogether. This mass shitty behaviour has kept the entire planet totally clueless to how mRNA is destroying people's organs , brains and hearts, and doctors still can't even find the answers in pathology.
It appears that you anticipate that the modRNA will always be correctly read at the ribosomes and will consequently produce exactly those peptides and proteines that were intended.
Always and 100%
Do you have any proove that the assumption of correct reading is true?
Always?
To a degree even near to 100%?
Agreed. When "spike" is said to be found it is highly likely that there are many other proteins also created, it's just that they only look for spike. The effects of such proteins are unknown but they aren't going to be beneficial, and almost certainly they would be pro-inflammatory.
I did a very short piece on framshifting here - asking who knew what, when?
https://sanityunleashed.substack.com/p/who-knew-what-and-when-about-the
Hiya, i don't believe that there is any viable mRNA in the vials transported around the country: in and out of fridges and freezers. I don't think any proteins, 'frameshifted' or otherwise, is translated by being injected with the jabs.
It stands to reason that p180-200 (aka the 'spike protein) is found after injection as it is likely to be a cellular protein involved in the inflammatory response and in detoxification.
As regards antibodies to it- it's true that many specific antibodies to proteins are produced by mammals, this is a way of detecting 'foreign' proteins and managing them. However, antibodies are also produced to cellular, pro-inflammatory proteins (mistakenly thought to be viral proteins) in the recovery phase of a healing event, in up to 30 times the base line titre, to return the body to homeostasis after the detox fever. This has given rise to the mistaken notion that antibodies are somehow involved in remembering 'infections'.
https://jowaller.substack.com/p/if-viruses-dont-exist-what-about?utm_source=publication-search
If the 'spike' is translated at all by the jabs- it has been known to be pro-inflammatory since the 90s. https://jowaller.substack.com/p/spikes-and-knobs?utm_source=publication-search
My point is that any foreign protein is inflammatory.
The only reason people fixate on spike is that that is the one being tested for.
In classical vaccines adjuvants have to added to create the 'immune' response as often the proteins don't have any effect.
Would the body recognise an mRNA product as 'foreign' when it has made it itself out of amino acids?
A final thought:
Unfortunately the Mulroney-paper occurred in Nature.
I, however, do not trust anymore anything published in Nature that is anyhow related to C19 or these vaccines. For me, Nature is as reliable regarding these themes as the NYT on Biden / Harris or the German BILD on Israel / Gaza.
So why should Nature have pubilshed a paper that points to fundamental ciriticism of the modRNA stuff?
Do you have an idea on this issue?
Excellent! Thank you very much!!!
Prof Ulrike Kämmerer told me on these issues in 2022. She is still underway getting her respective research published.
For me (not being biologist) it's that simple:
1. Apart from few exotic compounds, only 5 nucleosides are used in nature, from seaweed, trees, worms, elephants to human guinea-pigs. Everything is functioning well with these five.
2. The N1MPsU ist artificial, never occurred in nature.
3. If we (or "they") outwit the RNases, then we must also get some untoward effects on the ribosomes. This is because these five nucleosides are so fundamental. Fools may think that this would be totally different and independent issues. And business-minded people will make us think that the one issue has nothing at all to do with the other and that there would or could be a way to dissoble this dilemma..
However, I am convinced that no modRNA is thinkable that has resistance against RNases and that nevertheless perfectly works as natural RNA does.
This means: modRNA product are per se nonsense. Independent from the kind of vaccine, and, as to my opinion, also useless as therapeutic products.
JJ Couey has been bringing the receipts since 2021….
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/2249381359
https://gigaohmbiological.com/scooby