Edit: also, I spent many years tracking excess and all-causes mortality from the ABS but decided to stop at the beginning of 2024. They changed the baselines and reporting structure and parameters so many times that their reports no longer made sense. I don't have time to play games. If others do, great but I am no longer interested.
Spot on. 2023 showed ~23,000 excess deaths above the 5 year average, and the ABS and the government couldn’t have been less interested … even IF they could have proven their statistics weren’t manipulated, it completely put paid to the “safe and effective” vaccine narrative as more seniors died “of covid” in 2023 than 2022, more than 2021 and so on. Apparently an order of magnitude greater “covid death” number after the rollout meant the vaccines were obviously working as intended.
I have seen a lot of different Australian numbers from different analysts, but they are all much, much higher than what the ABS is claiming. When I first began looking at excess deaths at the beginning of 2022, I thought 'surely they will stop.' January 2022 was our highest ever: over 20% and that was from the ABS.
When I read the article that they just deleted them 'because reasons' I knew we had passed the point of no return and entered something very dark. As I said above, these people are playing games I believe to be demonic, and I want nothing to do with this darkness.
I have no doubt … we are compelled to combat bullshit using official bullshit unfortunately which is what I was referring to … as the old saying goes “start as you intend to carry on” and they’re not showing any signs of stopping the insanity or the gaslighting. Personally I can’t wait to be offered my first GSK bird flu vaccine that’s 95% effective against contradicting the government’s bullshit.
It's amazing isn't it? People keep telling me: oh they won't do another pandemic! Ok...but what about those massive jab manufacturing facilities they just built in Victoria (Moderna) and Qld? I suppose it could be money laundering but...I don't know. They really seem to be going for it.
The fact that you observed them covering their tracks is good to know. We would all expect that, but you actually went in and saw how the ‘sausage was made’… so to speak
Thank you ma'am but I can't take credit for the linked article. That was Alison Bevige a fellow Aussie.
I did, however, go deep into how the sausage was made in this article (using her article) with the efforts of a motivated reader. We contacted many Australian politicians about their attitudes to the excess deaths and I published their emails and what happened when I spoke to them (redacted). https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/australian-senate-rejects-and-obfuscates
It was very depressing. However much you think politicians despise us, multiply that by 100. They absolutely hate the public. After that experience, I vowed never to interact with a politician again in any meaningful way or even vote (rare exceptions apply). The system, at least for me, was busted wide open, once and for all.
"We are no longer measuring excess relative to pre-pandemic EXPECTATIONS." What? Prepandemic mortality data has nothing to do with "expectations" - it's supposed to represent actual mortality. Before the "pandemic." WTH?
Don't worry. We have been assured by top statisticians and scientists that all-cause death data isn't subject to manipulation and that globally-coordinated fraud is the stuff of conspiracy-minded moms
Actually, I think they mean that, until now, they were measuring excess from a baseline that was established before the pandemic declaration. Excess = a certain number/% above what is "expected" within a range.
I don't gather that they are talking there about raw numbers.
The baselines changing/adjusting every few years isn't unusual. Mary Pat Campbell is a good person to ask. (I'll ask.)
My biggest concern with Australia continues to be its 2020 data.
Very convenient.....covering their tracks, but also creating a new low baseline for a future upcoming? pandemic. After all, Vallance the Science Minister in the Labour government, has already said there'll be another 'pandemic'....'they' just haven't set the date.
Exactly the same occurs in the Netherlands. Fortunately we have a couple of very persistent critics. Looking at the total nr of annual deaths, its incredibly easy to recognise the pattern. Since 2020 there is a steep increase of total nr of deaths of around 10-15%. From there, it plateaus. By reworking the model, history is rewritten making is look as if there are no excess deaths. Good old Eastblock manipulation of the masses. Panem et circenses.
This is exactly what ONS England and Scotland have done, added another line of 'expected deaths' which coincides with the excess mortality numbers. Hey Presto, no excess deaths any more!
It is a disgraceful display of deceit. I don't know how they can sleep at night. They need to be prosecuted for falsifying evidence. I can't believe the arrogance. They think that we can't see straight through what they are doing. Those responsible shall rot in hell.
I did not write about this in the note but I personally believe that these people have fully delivered their souls to Satan. Katherine Watt does a good job describing it:
“In 1984, the Party used doublethink as part of its large-scale campaign of propaganda and psychological manipulation of its leadership and the public”. It now apparently has been adopted by all institutions in real life, fiction has now turned into our reality.
Australia's, New Zealand's and Germany's spring 2020 death curves are as suspicious as New York City's and Northern Italy's - but in a different direction - and present a serious challenge to those who continue to hand-wave with "lockdown" "antibiotic withdrawal" and "ventilators" as a catch-all explanations for simultaneous deaths spikes around the world. Is daily raw all cause by CITY available? (I don't plan to look, but Sydney and Melbourne would be worth someone delving into -- especially if deaths by setting is available.)
It comes as no surprise that Australia is making adjustments. (Didn't ONS do the same thing?) It's what I would expect in a "We kicked the can down the road" operation. That said, excess death isn't always a helpful concept and has done much to deflect in-depth, event-based analysis of the original globally-staged events in 2020. Adjustments to excess thresholds are typically done every 4-5 years in the U.S., I think. (Don't quote me on that; I'd need to check.)
Table 1 in the report is interesting because it lists COVID-19 deaths and then "Doctor-certified other respiratory diseases." COVID-19 is not under the WHO-ICD 10 respiratory disease codes (J codes). And don't we hear from "frontline doctors" that COVID-19 is a vascular disease, results in multi-organ failure, etc., etc?
I'd be interested in knowing if Australia is using U.071 and if they've adopted and are using ICD-11.
Apparently the Pharma trial method of approving drugs by moving goalposts has spread. I remember the diagnoses for Polio changed between pre- and post-jab date, so that even if a placebo was given, the cases would have gone down because there was as higher bar for a confirmed case. Maddening
When I think of the people who habitually create these evil laws and products I picture a bunch of Beevis and Buttheads, and "...I see them everywhere."
How can they establish a baseline for total excess mortality without looking at, well, all the available data? I might be more accepting if they used all the available data EXCEPT the Covid years. However, to just start fresh with 2023 and call it good is completely bogus. Am I missing something?
Yes, the Australian government has literally erased the 2022 non-'covid' excess deaths from the historical ledger: https://lettersfromaustralia.substack.com/p/hey-presto-the-2022-non-covid-excess
Edit: also, I spent many years tracking excess and all-causes mortality from the ABS but decided to stop at the beginning of 2024. They changed the baselines and reporting structure and parameters so many times that their reports no longer made sense. I don't have time to play games. If others do, great but I am no longer interested.
Spot on. 2023 showed ~23,000 excess deaths above the 5 year average, and the ABS and the government couldn’t have been less interested … even IF they could have proven their statistics weren’t manipulated, it completely put paid to the “safe and effective” vaccine narrative as more seniors died “of covid” in 2023 than 2022, more than 2021 and so on. Apparently an order of magnitude greater “covid death” number after the rollout meant the vaccines were obviously working as intended.
I have seen a lot of different Australian numbers from different analysts, but they are all much, much higher than what the ABS is claiming. When I first began looking at excess deaths at the beginning of 2022, I thought 'surely they will stop.' January 2022 was our highest ever: over 20% and that was from the ABS.
When I read the article that they just deleted them 'because reasons' I knew we had passed the point of no return and entered something very dark. As I said above, these people are playing games I believe to be demonic, and I want nothing to do with this darkness.
I have no doubt … we are compelled to combat bullshit using official bullshit unfortunately which is what I was referring to … as the old saying goes “start as you intend to carry on” and they’re not showing any signs of stopping the insanity or the gaslighting. Personally I can’t wait to be offered my first GSK bird flu vaccine that’s 95% effective against contradicting the government’s bullshit.
It's amazing isn't it? People keep telling me: oh they won't do another pandemic! Ok...but what about those massive jab manufacturing facilities they just built in Victoria (Moderna) and Qld? I suppose it could be money laundering but...I don't know. They really seem to be going for it.
The fact that you observed them covering their tracks is good to know. We would all expect that, but you actually went in and saw how the ‘sausage was made’… so to speak
Thank you ma'am but I can't take credit for the linked article. That was Alison Bevige a fellow Aussie.
I did, however, go deep into how the sausage was made in this article (using her article) with the efforts of a motivated reader. We contacted many Australian politicians about their attitudes to the excess deaths and I published their emails and what happened when I spoke to them (redacted). https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/australian-senate-rejects-and-obfuscates
It was very depressing. However much you think politicians despise us, multiply that by 100. They absolutely hate the public. After that experience, I vowed never to interact with a politician again in any meaningful way or even vote (rare exceptions apply). The system, at least for me, was busted wide open, once and for all.
"We are no longer measuring excess relative to pre-pandemic EXPECTATIONS." What? Prepandemic mortality data has nothing to do with "expectations" - it's supposed to represent actual mortality. Before the "pandemic." WTH?
Don't worry. We have been assured by top statisticians and scientists that all-cause death data isn't subject to manipulation and that globally-coordinated fraud is the stuff of conspiracy-minded moms
Right? “A lot more people have died this year compared to 2019 and before, but since we EXPECTED THAT, we are right on target and everything is fine.”
Unreal
fact manipulation and word manipulation. A kid caught with chocolate all over his face but has absolutely NOT touched the cookies
Actually, I think they mean that, until now, they were measuring excess from a baseline that was established before the pandemic declaration. Excess = a certain number/% above what is "expected" within a range.
I don't gather that they are talking there about raw numbers.
The baselines changing/adjusting every few years isn't unusual. Mary Pat Campbell is a good person to ask. (I'll ask.)
My biggest concern with Australia continues to be its 2020 data.
Very convenient.....covering their tracks, but also creating a new low baseline for a future upcoming? pandemic. After all, Vallance the Science Minister in the Labour government, has already said there'll be another 'pandemic'....'they' just haven't set the date.
Well that is as open an admission of guilt as we are likely to see.
Exactly the same occurs in the Netherlands. Fortunately we have a couple of very persistent critics. Looking at the total nr of annual deaths, its incredibly easy to recognise the pattern. Since 2020 there is a steep increase of total nr of deaths of around 10-15%. From there, it plateaus. By reworking the model, history is rewritten making is look as if there are no excess deaths. Good old Eastblock manipulation of the masses. Panem et circenses.
This is exactly what ONS England and Scotland have done, added another line of 'expected deaths' which coincides with the excess mortality numbers. Hey Presto, no excess deaths any more!
It is a disgraceful display of deceit. I don't know how they can sleep at night. They need to be prosecuted for falsifying evidence. I can't believe the arrogance. They think that we can't see straight through what they are doing. Those responsible shall rot in hell.
After reading many of their emails which were released via FOI I wrote a 'note' about this: https://substack.com/@excessdeathsau/note/c-63657113
I did not write about this in the note but I personally believe that these people have fully delivered their souls to Satan. Katherine Watt does a good job describing it:
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/on-demonic-possession-as-it-relates
Yet, here is a young pharmacist in Darwin whom we can celebrate who did not comply. He was the only one in his company. He is a hero: https://transcriberb.substack.com/p/hippocratic-oath-first-do-no-harm
In statistics it's called "cherry picking your start point" and is one of the most common tricks in this field.
It was even listed as one of the top ten ways of cheating in the best selling book " How to lie with statistics".
I think that's says it all.
I remember reading "How to lie with statistics" when I was about 12, over 50 years ago. A book that has stood the test of time.
by omitting the evidence, they have told the truth. A lie by omission is a lie nevertheless.
“In 1984, the Party used doublethink as part of its large-scale campaign of propaganda and psychological manipulation of its leadership and the public”. It now apparently has been adopted by all institutions in real life, fiction has now turned into our reality.
Australia's, New Zealand's and Germany's spring 2020 death curves are as suspicious as New York City's and Northern Italy's - but in a different direction - and present a serious challenge to those who continue to hand-wave with "lockdown" "antibiotic withdrawal" and "ventilators" as a catch-all explanations for simultaneous deaths spikes around the world. Is daily raw all cause by CITY available? (I don't plan to look, but Sydney and Melbourne would be worth someone delving into -- especially if deaths by setting is available.)
It comes as no surprise that Australia is making adjustments. (Didn't ONS do the same thing?) It's what I would expect in a "We kicked the can down the road" operation. That said, excess death isn't always a helpful concept and has done much to deflect in-depth, event-based analysis of the original globally-staged events in 2020. Adjustments to excess thresholds are typically done every 4-5 years in the U.S., I think. (Don't quote me on that; I'd need to check.)
Table 1 in the report is interesting because it lists COVID-19 deaths and then "Doctor-certified other respiratory diseases." COVID-19 is not under the WHO-ICD 10 respiratory disease codes (J codes). And don't we hear from "frontline doctors" that COVID-19 is a vascular disease, results in multi-organ failure, etc., etc?
I'd be interested in knowing if Australia is using U.071 and if they've adopted and are using ICD-11.
P.S. Australia also reported a still-unexplained off-season rise in flu tests administrated in March/April 2020. https://x.com/Wood_House76/status/1687515391910653952
Apparently the Pharma trial method of approving drugs by moving goalposts has spread. I remember the diagnoses for Polio changed between pre- and post-jab date, so that even if a placebo was given, the cases would have gone down because there was as higher bar for a confirmed case. Maddening
When I think of the people who habitually create these evil laws and products I picture a bunch of Beevis and Buttheads, and "...I see them everywhere."
I also thought it was funny when I read it. Here a the Actuaries article that reported it as well: https://www.actuaries.digital/2024/06/19/excess-mortality-in-first-two-months-of-2024-was-nil-noting-the-new-baseline/?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=240620-MCOM-Digest-%20Sub%20Digest&utm_content=240620-MCOM-Digest-%20Sub%20Digest+CID_9937dbc7daef5fc11b470a855f04de01&utm_source=Campaign%20Monitor&utm_term=Read%20more
Criminals.
How can they establish a baseline for total excess mortality without looking at, well, all the available data? I might be more accepting if they used all the available data EXCEPT the Covid years. However, to just start fresh with 2023 and call it good is completely bogus. Am I missing something?