The analogy could have been improved to include things like the coin viruses killing mainly older and poor people who rarely die with the high valued note viruses ….
A number of the bird flu "cases" currently being detected in "dairy workers" are via ... seroprevalence tests. OK so now having antibodies means you are a case? It doesn't mean you are simply immune to it anymore?
Also, uh, cross-reactivity anyone?
Is anyone examining old blood samples for seroprevalence? Maybe this has been around for 30 years?
They are claiming the virus is in milk, especially "raw milk."
It's mind boggling anyone could take this seriously.
'They' are trying to get people to take it seriously, but how much credibility do 'they' now have, how much impact will any new propaganda campaign have, if they do launch one in the early autumn? We've had claims galore around Covid-19, from the necessity for lockdowns, for people not to comfort each other during a funeral, in case the 'virus' was spread, and claims that the novel mrna jabs prevented infection/ transmission, and hospitalisation.
The 'corrupted' PCR tests -' exponentially rising cases' - enabled all these claims to be made....they are due a big exposé.....sooner rather than later.
Your articles never lose their shine and brilliance. Thank you for the best information.
I have picked out a "homework assignment" from the newly emerged RKI protocols, the explosiveness of which seems to have been underestimated (at least in Germany). Nobody writes about it... It is the infamous "hospital death protocols". They were linked in the RKI protocols. However, apart from the risk of death from the insane intubation, I am unable to identify the other dangers that can be derived from these hospital instructions. Would you perhaps like to fill in this gap and finish the article with me? If you want, you can take over the topic entirely. I suspect that there may be a great deal of explosiveness hidden in it... It could also be possible that the entire RKI protocols were faked and that the hospital protocols were intentionally made available in a weakened form. Such information may also be included in them.
I am just trying to find the time to look into the RKI stuff...obviously when something is in a language you don't speak it all takes a lot of time.
I have seen sufficient evidence to suggest that the "leak" may in fact be the deliberate and engineered release of versions of these documents which have been tampered with.
Jonathan, the WHO document is in English. It was only linked in the protocols. The recommended medications and the question of whether they can be harmful in the case of secondary bacterial pneumonia or ILI are interesting. I assume that the same document was sent worldwide and therefore it could be genuine. A later, second leak in another country is possible. It would be too risky to provide a watered-down/fake version here. Anything is possible, however. The fake can also be interesting. The question "What was watered-down/omitted in the fake version of the WHO hospital protocol?" would also be interesting. If it is not interesting to you, then that is understandable and completely fine. Best regards,
PCR works wonderfully as a tool for the lunacy of "pandemics" as marketed by organizations like WHO. It is a simple concept, yet the underlying science is amazingly complex. As such, it qualifies as magic that people can almost understand. (As an aside, I worked as the system engineer on a desktop PCR analyzer being developed at Kodak in Rochester, back in the early 90s. The project failed, ironically, due in some ways, to IP issues involving Dr. Mullis.) The simple quality of PCR allows it to be sold, like snake oil, to decision-makers, who can then market their decision to the masses using the magical quality.
The analogy could have been improved to include things like the coin viruses killing mainly older and poor people who rarely die with the high valued note viruses ….
Shockingly the coin viruses “kill” mostly very old people at or beyond life expectancy who were already in poor health. Shocking I tell you!
A number of the bird flu "cases" currently being detected in "dairy workers" are via ... seroprevalence tests. OK so now having antibodies means you are a case? It doesn't mean you are simply immune to it anymore?
Also, uh, cross-reactivity anyone?
Is anyone examining old blood samples for seroprevalence? Maybe this has been around for 30 years?
They are claiming the virus is in milk, especially "raw milk."
It's mind boggling anyone could take this seriously.
'They' are trying to get people to take it seriously, but how much credibility do 'they' now have, how much impact will any new propaganda campaign have, if they do launch one in the early autumn? We've had claims galore around Covid-19, from the necessity for lockdowns, for people not to comfort each other during a funeral, in case the 'virus' was spread, and claims that the novel mrna jabs prevented infection/ transmission, and hospitalisation.
The 'corrupted' PCR tests -' exponentially rising cases' - enabled all these claims to be made....they are due a big exposé.....sooner rather than later.
"Inventives" or "incentives"?!
Thanks - fixed.
Funny, both words work, don’t they…
Dear Jonathan,
Your articles never lose their shine and brilliance. Thank you for the best information.
I have picked out a "homework assignment" from the newly emerged RKI protocols, the explosiveness of which seems to have been underestimated (at least in Germany). Nobody writes about it... It is the infamous "hospital death protocols". They were linked in the RKI protocols. However, apart from the risk of death from the insane intubation, I am unable to identify the other dangers that can be derived from these hospital instructions. Would you perhaps like to fill in this gap and finish the article with me? If you want, you can take over the topic entirely. I suspect that there may be a great deal of explosiveness hidden in it... It could also be possible that the entire RKI protocols were faked and that the hospital protocols were intentionally made available in a weakened form. Such information may also be included in them.
Best regards,
Suavek
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-who-treatment-protocols-13-march
I am just trying to find the time to look into the RKI stuff...obviously when something is in a language you don't speak it all takes a lot of time.
I have seen sufficient evidence to suggest that the "leak" may in fact be the deliberate and engineered release of versions of these documents which have been tampered with.
https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/clinical-management-of-novel-cov.pdf
Jonathan, the WHO document is in English. It was only linked in the protocols. The recommended medications and the question of whether they can be harmful in the case of secondary bacterial pneumonia or ILI are interesting. I assume that the same document was sent worldwide and therefore it could be genuine. A later, second leak in another country is possible. It would be too risky to provide a watered-down/fake version here. Anything is possible, however. The fake can also be interesting. The question "What was watered-down/omitted in the fake version of the WHO hospital protocol?" would also be interesting. If it is not interesting to you, then that is understandable and completely fine. Best regards,
Suavek
It's unfortunate that the populace likes to be alarmed. They feed on scare stories. Editors will supply them if there's a demand.
PCR works wonderfully as a tool for the lunacy of "pandemics" as marketed by organizations like WHO. It is a simple concept, yet the underlying science is amazingly complex. As such, it qualifies as magic that people can almost understand. (As an aside, I worked as the system engineer on a desktop PCR analyzer being developed at Kodak in Rochester, back in the early 90s. The project failed, ironically, due in some ways, to IP issues involving Dr. Mullis.) The simple quality of PCR allows it to be sold, like snake oil, to decision-makers, who can then market their decision to the masses using the magical quality.