2 Comments
Mar 18Liked by Jonathan Engler

Vinay represents a narrow perspective in the debate over the rapid spread of what was labeled as a deadly novel virus. At most, he might concede that SARS-CoV-2 wasn’t as lethal as initially thought, but hesitates to delve into the true causes of mortality at the pandemic’s onset. He suggests that if the real dynamics of 2020’s fatalities were understood, the urgency for a vaccine, especially one based on gene therapy, would be questioned, arguing there was no need for such interventions.

This situation hints at the possibility that mRNA technology was intended for broader applications beyond immediate pandemic response. It suggests a potential shift away from traditional antibiotic treatments if primary bacterial infections decline, or even exploring mRNA’s utility in cancer treatment methodologies through transfection techniques.

Expand full comment
Mar 18Liked by Jonathan Engler

The medical profession will be the last to get the fraudulence of the covid debacle that has occurred over the past four years. They trust their medical authorities and most do not question them and always seem to follow their rules and regulations or protocols without question. Calling the experimental mRNA covid injection a vaccine was a tour de force and the perfect setup in that people especially doctors have been indoctrinated into how effective and safe they are for every man woman and child. We must also never question the science behind vaccines because if you do then you are labelled as an antivaxxer (the enemy of science).

Expand full comment