It was shocking during Covid watching "professionals" accept research studies from the pharmaceutical companies with competing interests. No one said ANYTHING and many verbally repeated the results as justification for the measures. I work in healthcare with some 'highly educated people'.
I think the most insane miscategorisation was that paper on household transmission in Nature. You had to trawl the supplementary section to find their definitions:
- Unvaccinated includes individuals with partial vaccination.
- Fully vaccinated includes UNVACCINATED INDIVIDUALS WITH PREVIOUS INFECTION
In other words, they were stealing the superior natural immunity of the infected unvaccinated and using it to bolster the vaxed numbers. Peer review is dead.
I would love your expert opinion on this story I have been working on.
The lab leak hoax is another distraction, the only way to create a worldwide pandemic is to clone lots and lots of virus and spread it all over the place.
If they would not have published it, they would have been very stupid and blatantly lying. And big thank you to the authors for this excellent systematic Review.
When will the journals withdraw all the papers that are based on the flawed data of all of these 38 "vaccine" "efficacy" "studies"?
Would be great for this to get published. Then it is multiple academics saying this in the proper channels. Doshi's team. Me. Fenton's team. Going to get hard to ignore.
This miscategorization could easily have been avoided by honest researchers if they had made 3 or 4 categories instead of 2: unvaccinated, recently/partially vaccinated, and vaccinated more than 14 days ago.
They didn't want to show the results in that light.
It is not scientifically possible to prove that any case of vaccination "prevented" any case of disease. Not possible because the case did not occur. Preventatives are measured "statistically" without any actual requirements for proof. It's interesting to compare "cure rate" calculations to "prevention rate" calculations - which reveals the nonsense on both sides to be little more than propaganda - and a lot of lies, damn lies, and statistics. Cancer cure rates, for example, are calculated without cures. Being included as."successful" in a cure rate calculation does not prove "cured." There is no medical test for "cancer cured," so even when a case of cancer is cured - no cure can be proven. We can cure cancers - most cases are cured, but we can't recognize, much less prove cured. So we study cancer cures "statistically." On the other hand, we can't recognize much less prove a case of prevention, so we study preventatives "statistically." This gives the mistaken impression that vaccine efficacy statistics are similar to cancer cure rate statistics. But they are not close..Cancer cure rate statistics have a very high correlation between the statistical cures and actual cases cured. Disease prevention statistics can have a very low, even zero correlation between actual cases prevented - even when the "statistically calculated result" is very high.
Why did it take so long to bring this obvious trick to light? I have no medical training but have follow all the experts closely for 4 years and counting. When I first learned about this trick it was obvious this made no sense, not counting adverse event, deaths but even infection for weeks after vaccination. This standard operating policy tells us the research industrial complex has been rotten for a very long time. Credibility score is zero.
this old news and very welcome to see it come up again. the covid monster is still with us and hidden just below the surface. the gangsters of the authorities can and will pull out their coercive punitive powers whenever they wish.
It might be time for me to start updating my 'site of records' again because I think I begin to detect, finally, a serious upswell of serious appraisal and interest in it all.
Many links have probably died since I put them there but considering the total number there'd still be hundreds are good and all filled with pertinent information.
N Italy story is deeply suspect too.
https://pandauncut.substack.com/p/were-the-unprecedented-excess-deaths
It was shocking during Covid watching "professionals" accept research studies from the pharmaceutical companies with competing interests. No one said ANYTHING and many verbally repeated the results as justification for the measures. I work in healthcare with some 'highly educated people'.
I think the most insane miscategorisation was that paper on household transmission in Nature. You had to trawl the supplementary section to find their definitions:
- Unvaccinated includes individuals with partial vaccination.
- Fully vaccinated includes UNVACCINATED INDIVIDUALS WITH PREVIOUS INFECTION
In other words, they were stealing the superior natural immunity of the infected unvaccinated and using it to bolster the vaxed numbers. Peer review is dead.
I would love your expert opinion on this story I have been working on.
The lab leak hoax is another distraction, the only way to create a worldwide pandemic is to clone lots and lots of virus and spread it all over the place.
More here; https://truthaddict.substack.com/p/lab-leak-zoonotic-spillover-or-deliberate
Thank you for the excellent summary.
If they would not have published it, they would have been very stupid and blatantly lying. And big thank you to the authors for this excellent systematic Review.
When will the journals withdraw all the papers that are based on the flawed data of all of these 38 "vaccine" "efficacy" "studies"?
Would be great for this to get published. Then it is multiple academics saying this in the proper channels. Doshi's team. Me. Fenton's team. Going to get hard to ignore.
This miscategorization could easily have been avoided by honest researchers if they had made 3 or 4 categories instead of 2: unvaccinated, recently/partially vaccinated, and vaccinated more than 14 days ago.
They didn't want to show the results in that light.
H1N1 never existed : The Spanish Flu, of 1918/1920, was a Bacterial Pneumonia induced by the Rockefeller Foundation’s “vaccines”
https://xochipelli.substack.com/p/h1n1-never-existed-the-spanish-flu
Thank you
China. The Pandemic never existed. Total absence of excess mortality, in 2020, except in Wuhan. Why is this so?
https://xochipelli.substack.com/p/china-the-pandemic-never-existed
It is not scientifically possible to prove that any case of vaccination "prevented" any case of disease. Not possible because the case did not occur. Preventatives are measured "statistically" without any actual requirements for proof. It's interesting to compare "cure rate" calculations to "prevention rate" calculations - which reveals the nonsense on both sides to be little more than propaganda - and a lot of lies, damn lies, and statistics. Cancer cure rates, for example, are calculated without cures. Being included as."successful" in a cure rate calculation does not prove "cured." There is no medical test for "cancer cured," so even when a case of cancer is cured - no cure can be proven. We can cure cancers - most cases are cured, but we can't recognize, much less prove cured. So we study cancer cures "statistically." On the other hand, we can't recognize much less prove a case of prevention, so we study preventatives "statistically." This gives the mistaken impression that vaccine efficacy statistics are similar to cancer cure rate statistics. But they are not close..Cancer cure rate statistics have a very high correlation between the statistical cures and actual cases cured. Disease prevention statistics can have a very low, even zero correlation between actual cases prevented - even when the "statistically calculated result" is very high.
To your health, Tracy
Author: A New Theory of Cure
Why did it take so long to bring this obvious trick to light? I have no medical training but have follow all the experts closely for 4 years and counting. When I first learned about this trick it was obvious this made no sense, not counting adverse event, deaths but even infection for weeks after vaccination. This standard operating policy tells us the research industrial complex has been rotten for a very long time. Credibility score is zero.
I hope some readers realise that the harms from the injections was anticipated by experienced drug discovery professionals and warned about?
This was wholly INTENTIONAL.
https://open.substack.com/pub/drmikeyeadon/p/my-letter-to-pc-ben-bates?r=gop0d&utm_medium=ios
this old news and very welcome to see it come up again. the covid monster is still with us and hidden just below the surface. the gangsters of the authorities can and will pull out their coercive punitive powers whenever they wish.
It might be time for me to start updating my 'site of records' again because I think I begin to detect, finally, a serious upswell of serious appraisal and interest in it all.
Many links have probably died since I put them there but considering the total number there'd still be hundreds are good and all filled with pertinent information.
Help yourselves: https://covidhonesty.com/
The Necro-Corona of “Molecular Spikes of Graphene Oxide”, and not the invisible coronavirus, induces a SMOG in the human organism
https://xochipelli.substack.com/p/the-necro-corona-of-molecular-spikes