Please read..it is one of the keys to understanding what happened in spring 2020...
...and everything else since.
The Scottish covid inquiry - though obviously not a free-for-all in terms of what can be said - has certainly gone places the London equivalent has not dared to go.
Please watch this 3-minute clip and this 2-minute one about care homes. They describe a policy applying Do Not Resuscitate orders (“DNRs”) without the knowledge of the individual or their family.
It looks like that may have green-lit the implementation of end-of-life policies involving the administration of midazolam and other drugs.
But how many of those people were really at the end of their lives?
Perhaps you don’t believe that the judgment of healthcare professionals can be clouded in certain circumstances - resulting in previously sacrosanct ethical red lines being simply washed away?
Perhaps you think that an “advanced, developed” society will ultimately re-assert those red lines by ensuring full accountability - after a transparent investigation - if they are crossed?
If you harbour any such delusions, then please read the article which
and I published last year about the aftermath of Hurricae Katrina in New Orleans in 2006, and its parallels to the events of the covid era.It’s a story I had never heard of until last year, but it is astonishing and wide-ranging in its implications.
Remember:
Every one of these cases of death through euthanasia or other deviations from normal treatment would have contributed to the imputed “covid” case fatality rate.
We don’t know how many “covid deaths” were subject to such policies around the world, but it would be nice to know, wouldn’t it?
I do not believe doctors or nurses had a deliberate intent to cause harm, I think they were given protocols handed down to them from whatever regulatory body they trust and answer to, then followed them to the letter. If they question why the patients do not survive it will never be the protocols it will be rationalised, it is the effect of the "deadly disease" and the patient's age/underlying condition or we followed the protocol and "tried our best" but the patient was weakened by the "deadly disease", there are many scenarios they can play in their head. They then move on to the next patient and repeat the same actions. I think the protocols absolved them from responsibility and encouraged groupthink where no one questioned the authority giving them orders, critical thinking was discouraged. We were all told it was a time of life threatening emergency, doctors are not exempt from succumbing to the same fear and hysteria that was deliberately pushed onto the populations. The scariest thing was the need to blindly follow orders even to the detriment of their patients, it becomes almost a mission. "I'm doing this for your own good" should fill us all with fear.
In the UK, Chris Whitty - Chief Medical Officer England and his 3 counterparts in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, alongside other ‘high-ups’ in the so called health-care field, signed a letter informing NHS staff that deviating from established NHS rules and practice would basically be overlooked by their professional bodies.
An official get-out-of-jail card issued to formalise and normalise questionable - and abhorrent- practice.
https://twitter.com/CMO_England/status/1326516354300735488