Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Gaye's avatar

Looks like somebody knew this way back in 2006.

“So peer review is a flawed process, full of easily identified defects with little evidence that it works. Nevertheless, it is likely to remain central to science and journals because there is no obvious alternative, and scientists and editors have a continuing belief in peer review. How odd that science should be rooted in belief.”

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1420798/

Expand full comment
Woody's avatar

One only has to watch the stock of a pharmaceutical company when it mentions positive or negative clinical results for a new drug, to understand why peer review standards will fall prey to those with vested interests.

Combine that with the lax approach to drug advertising on MSM (who has become severely compromised by their sponsors), or the laws surrounding sponsor's vaccine liability. Peer review is simply in the food chain to be manipulated by the vested interests.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts