Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Seacat's avatar

'They' have done both from the outset. I don't understand all the implications of the content of this Paper, maybe just a few, but to manufacture at pace and in huge quantities, something they called a vaxx but was a new 'therapy' on a new platform, and say that it was suitable for everyone, including pregnant women, and 6 month old babies ( U.S.A) is incomprehensible! (But, probably not in terms of financial returns).

I think the lies told are worse than the 'not looking', because the lies are indefensible. So big were/are the lies about the 'vaccines', they are matched by the large number of harms and fatalities.

Here's an example of someone who refuses to look at what one 'vaccine' has done....Dr Ellie Canon writes in the Health section in the MoS ( Mail on Sunday). In the May 12th edition, under a title, 'Don't Worry If You Had The Astrazeneca Jab' ( not a 'vaccine' then?), she claims, " The important things to know about the AZ jab is that blood clots were extremely rare, and people who had it don't need to worry about problems developing now. If anything was going to happen, it would have happened pretty much right away." Oh, that's all right then. What a comfort. What a blithe dismissal of all the people injured by the AZ. This doctor has never 'looked', like so many of her peers. How can she possibly say that people who had it "don't need to worry about problems developing now", any more than the pushers of Pfizer, Moderna 'vaccines' can claim that the mrna cannot possibly have long term deleterious effects?

Expand full comment
Dr Mike Yeadon's avatar

These aren’t regulated pharmaceutical products in the USA but “countermeasures” deployed in a “public health emergency”.

The role of the regulatory agencies is to say “Authorised”, regardless of the properties of the material for which emergency use authorization is sought protected by immunity that comes into force automatically upon declaration of a public health emergency.

It’s theatre that they’re half pretending that they’re holding manufacturers feet to the fire, for there are no criteria whatsoever that apply.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts