I was an early signatory. It was of it's time. As a doctor of forty years, mostly working in general practice the language used seemed sane and in keeping with what I then thought I knew! Also, it was such a a relief to find that others across the world saw things as I did. But I've unlearned so much, and agree- it was ballox!
The Declaration needs to be updated... however I spoke with one of the sub authors when this dropped ... and a number of times in the ensuing months.... included was a discussion of mass deployment of leaky vaccines during a pandemic and the risks of doing that... he said he would not touch that subject publicly as it would destroy his career...
I imagine most who signed the original declaration would not sign if these amendments were made to a new version -- they'd be particularly averse to any suggestion that the authorities purposely murdered people using ventilators, drugs such as Midazolam ... and refusing to use standard protocols for treating severe respiratory illnesses....
I signed the GBD also. I admit, even though I’m an MD with an immunology background, I was brainwashed by the constant fearmongering. In retrospect it looks (and is/was) nonsensical. Dr B is being touted as a great choice for the NIH Director. Yet he refuses to engage, as far as I know, in any dialogue with either you or Jessica Hockett about the fact that the whole pandemic was faked, as they always are. How does this qualify him if he, like his predecessor, doesn’t promote open scientific discourse?
Thanks Jonathan. Just the tip of the iceberg as to the underlying damage that has (and is) being done from the actions still pushed by the authors of the GBD.
From flawed testing to mandated COVID shots (for healthcare workers), deadly isolation and so much more. All based on a fundamental lie of the COVID 'Case'.
"As I said, I admired the Cornell response while watching it from, from Stanford. It's a tremendously difficult choice with constraints from, from all over the place and manage that as best as possible. There's no way to do it perfectly where everyone's happy. This was just not possible."
From Aug. 2020 here is Bhattacharya and John Ioannidis advocating for masks, lockdowns and social distancing.
We all knew at the time that the 'response ' to the ?virus was hugely irregular and authoritarian, but none of us had 20/20 vision (no pun intended).
I saw through the hoax of lockdowns and masks immediately, but fell for the vaccine hoax, naively believing it would be the solution to the idiocy.
Don't be overly critical of those who continue to support the GBD, and don't forget you're on the same side. The 'virus' was only one element of a cultural/economic power war, even if it was a decisive victory for 'opposition '.
As Jay Bhartachaya said himself, we may have come to the end of 400 years of the Enlightenment. Those of us who comprehend that should feel comfortable with our relatively minor disagreements.
Thank you for sharing your journey through Corona - it has impacted different people in very different ways.
I am a retired, married person and was 69 yrs old when the Corona event started.
Certainly two of our three daughters took the vaccine, not under mandate, but one to travel and the other, an NHS doctor, I suspect because of peer pressure (I think she understood the risks). Very many of my (then) friends also got vaccinated and urged me to do so but by then I had seen through the scam by simply looking at the Italian data which my wife had fortunately found. In naively trying warn friends and family about the greatest criminal illusion in all of history (as I saw it and tried to express it in cartoon drawings), I lost very many friends due to my ‘extreme’ views. The worst aspect of this great crime I think is the psychological effect on people which has caused a real divide in society. Meanwhile, this silent war of technocracy, which has been called the Omniwar, and for which I think Corona was the initiating staged event, rolls on with most people unaware they are being attacked. Due to the deliberately induced divisions in society caused in large part by never-before-experienced levels of propaganda, it has become difficult or impossible to engage with people on the other side and even among differing groups on the ‘freedom’ side. Somehow we have to get back to being able to have civil discourse.
Didn't need 20/20 anything or a crystal ball or tea leaves just needed to know a little history which in these times would have taken well about one single hour to figure out that it was fraud from the get go. Some of us were warning people and fighting against the coming extortion in Feb. 2020 and offered all of these people ample sources and opportunities to see through this con.
Not only is what I'm saying here UNDERLY critical, as most of these people should be in prison, but I am absolutely NOT on the side of any of these people and stand in direct opposition to their stands then and to what they hold to believe true now. Ioannidis' latest published chunk of garbage is just another example.
If you (or anyone) couldn't figure out that a corporation convicted of over 70 felony offenses was not exactly involved in the "public good" I don't know what to say.
Folks like Jay and countless others are part of the problem and stand in the way of people understanding the medical syndicate and the countless crimes they commit.
Initially I thought similarly ... but then I asked these questions
Every country on the planet is on board with the Injections. Even Sweden. When have all countries aligned on any issue? Never.
Not a single MSM outlet is interviewing any of the expert dissenters – Yeadon, Bridle, Montagnier, Bossche etc… and the mainstream social media platforms are blocking them.
Circa 2024 it is easy to get 100's of countries on board via various "contracts" and "obligations" that these countries must adhere to or they will get punished through various sanctions courtesy of the IMF, World Bank etc.
They just run the operations through the WHO, UN, NATO.
Wiping out large numbers of people, especially pensioners, is a bonus in the eyes of these ghoulish eugenicists.
If it was about money... and you have the power to control every entity on the planet that might push back..... then effectively you run the world.
Why would you resort to flogging dodgy covid vaccines for money? You just tell the Fed you need $$$.... and they ask how much
Also if it was about $$$ why did they use LNPs and go through all this trouble...why did they inject poison? Why not just inject a relatively benign substance... a tweaked flu vaccine
Glad to see there are still some out there that won't let this crime against humanity pass. I'm astounded that so many - even those who were resisting it - have essentially memory holed it and moved on. Millions dead, injured for life, and destroyed and the death toll from this crime spree and the injection is far from over. I'm still furious at myself for buying for one second that this scam ever existed at the start. Four or five years in, there's no excuse in the world to attach any validity to ANY of it. There was no pandemic and there was no viral entity called Covid19.
The left went completely insane, and what's even more disturbing here is that guys like Bhattacharya, Oz, and RFK are now in tow with Captain Warp Speed/Ventilator King Trump as supposed opposition to any of it. Beyond laughable. Controlled opposition doesn't even begin to cover this madness.
Hope you're well man. Don't ever back off from exposing the depravity that took place. It's not over. It will never be over. Never forget.
Though I was acutely aware of the rank hypocrisy of the liberal class I still can't believe what I witnessed and went through on a daily basis in the lib/prog sinkhole where I was living at the time. No need to review that here.
What I was astounded at was how suddenly moronic and a-historical most of the Marxist, socialists etc. became virtually overnight. You'd think they would apply some economic analysis and historical context to the operation but not only did they avoid this they rebuffed anyone who tried to address the corona crisis in these terms.
So much for historical materialism.
Excellent to see you around- still going strong here.
Not only rebuffed, but vilified, attacked, and erased man. I still see some around and they're still doing it in full force. Not a single ounce of self-reflection to their complicity. They are unable to admit they were wrong. In the face of mountains of evidence and research that proves it beyond any doubt. The silence from the even the fence-sitters is deafening. Deep denial at a level I've never seen.
I've lost family, friends, and more for not backing down and speaking out. I'm sure you've experienced the same. I've watched some of them lose their friends and family members way too early from the injection. Many sickened and a shell of their former selves. Still, it doesn't click in their minds. They can't make the connection. I grieve it all man, but there's no possibility of reasoning with them.
Personally I did lose a lot as I was very outspoken and involved in protests and leaf letting and too many discussions to recount. For that I paid a heavy price yet am only motivated further. I don't talk about it too much.
You always have an ally here. Don't hesitate to call upon a friend to jump in the fray whenever you need a hand.
As has become all too frequent, your points are well taken and wonderfully communicated.
I admit that I DESPERATELY do not want to place the authors of the GBD on the side of "the enemy." That said, many tenets upon which the horrendous response during the GCDF was based reflect approaches and beliefs expressed within that document. Unfortunate, but true.
(As an aside, even now John Ioannidis, an ostensible champion of a more reasonable approach based upon the Diamond Princess data, published a paper, based upon a model, illustrating how many lives the mRNA vaccines saved!)
I’ve been warning people about the GBD and all their people since day one. Not only did I not sign it, but I was shamed by all the “ Team Reality folks and more for speaking out against it. Jay B blocked me on Twitter.
The declaration made a kind of sense if it was an attempt to shift government policy, in the belief that this was more likely to succeed than outright opposition. If that was indeed the intention, then it failed and should have been withdrawn. Ideally the 3 main sponsors would now publicly repudiate it, and assert that the whole idea of “protection” was misguided. The last thing we need is the GBD to provide government with a blueprint for the next (real or imagined) “pandemic”.
Like so many, the past five years have been a steep curve of re-learning, including a careful study of the methodologically impoverished field of 'virology'. Careful review of early papers (Almeida & Tyrrell 1967) "corona", (Smith, Andrews, & Laidlaw 1933) "influenza" serves to highlight the virological retreat to computer generated in silico constructs with any absence of direct and indirect evidence of an in vivo biological entity referred to as a contagious, self-replicating intracellular parasite. This remains a phantasmagorical construct looking for a 'germ'. At the same time, multiple glaring insults to health, well being and productive longevity afflict humanity, not least among which number the intentional and unethical actions of those determined to poison a majority.
I agree with others, that the Great Barrington Declaration was for a time and the only thing which seemed rational and hopeful in the utter madness of what was going on. I too signed it with reservations on focussed protection, testing and vaccines but it was still an improvement on what we had and an acceptable option for sowing seeds of doubt. As sceptics (for want of a better word), we had an additional burden with our views which were at odds with family members, friends, colleagues and neighbours. We were desperate for them to see how much was wrong so the declaration possibly exploited our vulnerability and subtly coerced us into colluding with measures we instinctively knew were wrong. The GBD presents a model that could be seen as a more rational response to the 'next pandemic' and I suspect the model that the various inquiries could well recommend on the basis that the sceptics were right after all and they've endorsed this alternative and less harmful approach. I'm shifting my position and agree that signatures, especially prominent ones, should be removed or better still, the declaration should be withdrawn.
The long overdue need to revise or withdraw it isn’t just an academic nicety.
The existence of this Declaration is contributing to actual ongoing harm, as described by David Dickson. His MiL’s care home isn’t a one-off by any means, and Canada in general isn’t a total outlier.
The withdrawal of the Declaration and an admission that its premises were faulty could go a long way towards encouraging those people still in the fear zone (which includes many HCWs) to reject the ongoing harmful “measures”.
This would improve the lives of many, prevent ongoing deaths, and help slow down or stop the pandemic preparedness industry, which is currently attempting to transform our society inexorably into a biosecurity surveillance state run for the benefit of the pharma-industrial complex and various technocratic collaborators.
The GBD has not aged well and you’re correct to disassociate from it Jonathan. ‘Focused protection’ in reality becomes social isolation and neglect of vulnerable people, and is, inevitably, a hugely damaging, counterproductive and cruel policy. That much should’ve been obvious 4 years ago.
The original GBD had a series of appendices (about 7) attached which exposed the document for what it really is - a pharma cartel promotion from three vaccine lovers.
The appendices have been removed.
I wonder why.
Sadly, I can't find a copy but I recall writing about them. Perhaps someone has the original version and not the truncated one?
Not yet. I was on twitter and don't have an account with it anymore. I recall one of them was recommending the killzines for their mythicat risk" population.
Wonder if the authors, given the chance, would edit/reword the gbd in light of what we now know? I’m guessing it would likely have to be a drastically different document to reach original signatories at this point….
Bring on Event 201 followed by the disappearance of ALL pandemic response documentation across the globe followed by mass propaganda campaign via captured media, same language different dialects hit the go button & Bob's your father's brother.
Event 201 followed by removal of ALL sensible pandemic response documentation in the first instance ( this did happen) followed by mass one size fits all, world-wide, same language different dialect propaganda campaign, flu to disappear replaced by BS novel virus & Bob's your father's brother.
That was a very good breakdown. I had not revisted it myself. I think at the time I must have been glad that at least it was challenging the nonsense in some way, and was all I had observed at the time.
I have said it was helpful at the time but it might have been only in the limited sense as I did know that COVID 19 was a psy op by then, June 2020 in reality.
But rereading it I realise they are talking in the main a load of bollox. This much they say is true though:
"Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health."
I was an early signatory. It was of it's time. As a doctor of forty years, mostly working in general practice the language used seemed sane and in keeping with what I then thought I knew! Also, it was such a a relief to find that others across the world saw things as I did. But I've unlearned so much, and agree- it was ballox!
It was, all of it, bar the "Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health."
But not because of reducing vaccine uptake which is a positive boon. I would not have said that before 2020 but my eyes were opened thankfully.
The Declaration needs to be updated... however I spoke with one of the sub authors when this dropped ... and a number of times in the ensuing months.... included was a discussion of mass deployment of leaky vaccines during a pandemic and the risks of doing that... he said he would not touch that subject publicly as it would destroy his career...
I imagine most who signed the original declaration would not sign if these amendments were made to a new version -- they'd be particularly averse to any suggestion that the authorities purposely murdered people using ventilators, drugs such as Midazolam ... and refusing to use standard protocols for treating severe respiratory illnesses....
I signed the GBD also. I admit, even though I’m an MD with an immunology background, I was brainwashed by the constant fearmongering. In retrospect it looks (and is/was) nonsensical. Dr B is being touted as a great choice for the NIH Director. Yet he refuses to engage, as far as I know, in any dialogue with either you or Jessica Hockett about the fact that the whole pandemic was faked, as they always are. How does this qualify him if he, like his predecessor, doesn’t promote open scientific discourse?
Thanks Jonathan. Just the tip of the iceberg as to the underlying damage that has (and is) being done from the actions still pushed by the authors of the GBD.
From flawed testing to mandated COVID shots (for healthcare workers), deadly isolation and so much more. All based on a fundamental lie of the COVID 'Case'.
David.
avoidabledeathawareness.com
"Nice guy" Jay Bhattacharya advocated for masks, partial lockdowns/restrictions and (anti) social distancing throughout 2020.
Jay said he "admired Cornell University's response" which included forcing injections, masks and firing employees who resisted the mandates.
Here he is speaking at Cornell:
https://vod.video.cornell.edu/media/20230220_Pandemic%20What%20We%20Got%20Right%20What%20We%20Got%20Wrong/1_vpnpv7u4
"As I said, I admired the Cornell response while watching it from, from Stanford. It's a tremendously difficult choice with constraints from, from all over the place and manage that as best as possible. There's no way to do it perfectly where everyone's happy. This was just not possible."
From Aug. 2020 here is Bhattacharya and John Ioannidis advocating for masks, lockdowns and social distancing.
http://biomechanics.stanford.edu/paper/CMAME20.pdf
We all knew at the time that the 'response ' to the ?virus was hugely irregular and authoritarian, but none of us had 20/20 vision (no pun intended).
I saw through the hoax of lockdowns and masks immediately, but fell for the vaccine hoax, naively believing it would be the solution to the idiocy.
Don't be overly critical of those who continue to support the GBD, and don't forget you're on the same side. The 'virus' was only one element of a cultural/economic power war, even if it was a decisive victory for 'opposition '.
As Jay Bhartachaya said himself, we may have come to the end of 400 years of the Enlightenment. Those of us who comprehend that should feel comfortable with our relatively minor disagreements.
Thank you for sharing your journey through Corona - it has impacted different people in very different ways.
I am a retired, married person and was 69 yrs old when the Corona event started.
Certainly two of our three daughters took the vaccine, not under mandate, but one to travel and the other, an NHS doctor, I suspect because of peer pressure (I think she understood the risks). Very many of my (then) friends also got vaccinated and urged me to do so but by then I had seen through the scam by simply looking at the Italian data which my wife had fortunately found. In naively trying warn friends and family about the greatest criminal illusion in all of history (as I saw it and tried to express it in cartoon drawings), I lost very many friends due to my ‘extreme’ views. The worst aspect of this great crime I think is the psychological effect on people which has caused a real divide in society. Meanwhile, this silent war of technocracy, which has been called the Omniwar, and for which I think Corona was the initiating staged event, rolls on with most people unaware they are being attacked. Due to the deliberately induced divisions in society caused in large part by never-before-experienced levels of propaganda, it has become difficult or impossible to engage with people on the other side and even among differing groups on the ‘freedom’ side. Somehow we have to get back to being able to have civil discourse.
I've lost most of my long friendships... the bridges are burned... no going back.
I am ok with that
Uh, no- to pretty much everything you said.
Didn't need 20/20 anything or a crystal ball or tea leaves just needed to know a little history which in these times would have taken well about one single hour to figure out that it was fraud from the get go. Some of us were warning people and fighting against the coming extortion in Feb. 2020 and offered all of these people ample sources and opportunities to see through this con.
Not only is what I'm saying here UNDERLY critical, as most of these people should be in prison, but I am absolutely NOT on the side of any of these people and stand in direct opposition to their stands then and to what they hold to believe true now. Ioannidis' latest published chunk of garbage is just another example.
If you (or anyone) couldn't figure out that a corporation convicted of over 70 felony offenses was not exactly involved in the "public good" I don't know what to say.
Folks like Jay and countless others are part of the problem and stand in the way of people understanding the medical syndicate and the countless crimes they commit.
Initially I thought similarly ... but then I asked these questions
Every country on the planet is on board with the Injections. Even Sweden. When have all countries aligned on any issue? Never.
Not a single MSM outlet is interviewing any of the expert dissenters – Yeadon, Bridle, Montagnier, Bossche etc… and the mainstream social media platforms are blocking them.
Why?
This is what I came up with
https://fasteddynz.substack.com/p/the-ultimate-extinction-plan-uep
It's racketeering.
Circa 2024 it is easy to get 100's of countries on board via various "contracts" and "obligations" that these countries must adhere to or they will get punished through various sanctions courtesy of the IMF, World Bank etc.
They just run the operations through the WHO, UN, NATO.
Wiping out large numbers of people, especially pensioners, is a bonus in the eyes of these ghoulish eugenicists.
What do you think would happen if they refused to inject vaccines and cull the billions?
Let's say that resulted in half the population living beyond 90 years of age.
You started with an implied assumption.
In any case the hypothetical is dependent upon numerous variables.
If it was about money... and you have the power to control every entity on the planet that might push back..... then effectively you run the world.
Why would you resort to flogging dodgy covid vaccines for money? You just tell the Fed you need $$$.... and they ask how much
Also if it was about $$$ why did they use LNPs and go through all this trouble...why did they inject poison? Why not just inject a relatively benign substance... a tweaked flu vaccine
This is NOT about $$$$
I've since come to realize why we have vaccines... an upside down food pyramid... and not even a feeble attempt to improve the health of the herd https://fasteddynz.substack.com/p/vaccines-are-population-control
Glad to see there are still some out there that won't let this crime against humanity pass. I'm astounded that so many - even those who were resisting it - have essentially memory holed it and moved on. Millions dead, injured for life, and destroyed and the death toll from this crime spree and the injection is far from over. I'm still furious at myself for buying for one second that this scam ever existed at the start. Four or five years in, there's no excuse in the world to attach any validity to ANY of it. There was no pandemic and there was no viral entity called Covid19.
The left went completely insane, and what's even more disturbing here is that guys like Bhattacharya, Oz, and RFK are now in tow with Captain Warp Speed/Ventilator King Trump as supposed opposition to any of it. Beyond laughable. Controlled opposition doesn't even begin to cover this madness.
Hope you're well man. Don't ever back off from exposing the depravity that took place. It's not over. It will never be over. Never forget.
Though I was acutely aware of the rank hypocrisy of the liberal class I still can't believe what I witnessed and went through on a daily basis in the lib/prog sinkhole where I was living at the time. No need to review that here.
What I was astounded at was how suddenly moronic and a-historical most of the Marxist, socialists etc. became virtually overnight. You'd think they would apply some economic analysis and historical context to the operation but not only did they avoid this they rebuffed anyone who tried to address the corona crisis in these terms.
So much for historical materialism.
Excellent to see you around- still going strong here.
Not only rebuffed, but vilified, attacked, and erased man. I still see some around and they're still doing it in full force. Not a single ounce of self-reflection to their complicity. They are unable to admit they were wrong. In the face of mountains of evidence and research that proves it beyond any doubt. The silence from the even the fence-sitters is deafening. Deep denial at a level I've never seen.
I've lost family, friends, and more for not backing down and speaking out. I'm sure you've experienced the same. I've watched some of them lose their friends and family members way too early from the injection. Many sickened and a shell of their former selves. Still, it doesn't click in their minds. They can't make the connection. I grieve it all man, but there's no possibility of reasoning with them.
Stay well old friend.
Personally I did lose a lot as I was very outspoken and involved in protests and leaf letting and too many discussions to recount. For that I paid a heavy price yet am only motivated further. I don't talk about it too much.
You always have an ally here. Don't hesitate to call upon a friend to jump in the fray whenever you need a hand.
As has become all too frequent, your points are well taken and wonderfully communicated.
I admit that I DESPERATELY do not want to place the authors of the GBD on the side of "the enemy." That said, many tenets upon which the horrendous response during the GCDF was based reflect approaches and beliefs expressed within that document. Unfortunate, but true.
(As an aside, even now John Ioannidis, an ostensible champion of a more reasonable approach based upon the Diamond Princess data, published a paper, based upon a model, illustrating how many lives the mRNA vaccines saved!)
“Too frequent” ?!🤣
#NoOffense
#WithAllDueRespect
Sorry, I see now that sounds horrible!
I’ve been warning people about the GBD and all their people since day one. Not only did I not sign it, but I was shamed by all the “ Team Reality folks and more for speaking out against it. Jay B blocked me on Twitter.
The declaration made a kind of sense if it was an attempt to shift government policy, in the belief that this was more likely to succeed than outright opposition. If that was indeed the intention, then it failed and should have been withdrawn. Ideally the 3 main sponsors would now publicly repudiate it, and assert that the whole idea of “protection” was misguided. The last thing we need is the GBD to provide government with a blueprint for the next (real or imagined) “pandemic”.
A very well written and IMO totally correct piece. Bravo, I totally agree with every word in the [ ]
Like so many, the past five years have been a steep curve of re-learning, including a careful study of the methodologically impoverished field of 'virology'. Careful review of early papers (Almeida & Tyrrell 1967) "corona", (Smith, Andrews, & Laidlaw 1933) "influenza" serves to highlight the virological retreat to computer generated in silico constructs with any absence of direct and indirect evidence of an in vivo biological entity referred to as a contagious, self-replicating intracellular parasite. This remains a phantasmagorical construct looking for a 'germ'. At the same time, multiple glaring insults to health, well being and productive longevity afflict humanity, not least among which number the intentional and unethical actions of those determined to poison a majority.
I agree with others, that the Great Barrington Declaration was for a time and the only thing which seemed rational and hopeful in the utter madness of what was going on. I too signed it with reservations on focussed protection, testing and vaccines but it was still an improvement on what we had and an acceptable option for sowing seeds of doubt. As sceptics (for want of a better word), we had an additional burden with our views which were at odds with family members, friends, colleagues and neighbours. We were desperate for them to see how much was wrong so the declaration possibly exploited our vulnerability and subtly coerced us into colluding with measures we instinctively knew were wrong. The GBD presents a model that could be seen as a more rational response to the 'next pandemic' and I suspect the model that the various inquiries could well recommend on the basis that the sceptics were right after all and they've endorsed this alternative and less harmful approach. I'm shifting my position and agree that signatures, especially prominent ones, should be removed or better still, the declaration should be withdrawn.
Good summary of why I signed it initially.
The long overdue need to revise or withdraw it isn’t just an academic nicety.
The existence of this Declaration is contributing to actual ongoing harm, as described by David Dickson. His MiL’s care home isn’t a one-off by any means, and Canada in general isn’t a total outlier.
The withdrawal of the Declaration and an admission that its premises were faulty could go a long way towards encouraging those people still in the fear zone (which includes many HCWs) to reject the ongoing harmful “measures”.
This would improve the lives of many, prevent ongoing deaths, and help slow down or stop the pandemic preparedness industry, which is currently attempting to transform our society inexorably into a biosecurity surveillance state run for the benefit of the pharma-industrial complex and various technocratic collaborators.
I don't think the unholy trinity will withdraw the gbd simply because they are happily in bed with the pharma cartel.
A good synopsis. Thanks.
The GBD has not aged well and you’re correct to disassociate from it Jonathan. ‘Focused protection’ in reality becomes social isolation and neglect of vulnerable people, and is, inevitably, a hugely damaging, counterproductive and cruel policy. That much should’ve been obvious 4 years ago.
The original GBD had a series of appendices (about 7) attached which exposed the document for what it really is - a pharma cartel promotion from three vaccine lovers.
The appendices have been removed.
I wonder why.
Sadly, I can't find a copy but I recall writing about them. Perhaps someone has the original version and not the truncated one?
Can you find what you wrote about them?
Not yet. I was on twitter and don't have an account with it anymore. I recall one of them was recommending the killzines for their mythicat risk" population.
Hi.
Are you referring to the FAQ? https://gbdeclaration.org/frequently-asked-questions/
There's also this, with references: https://gbdeclaration.org/focused-protection/
I haven't read these before so it was interesting to see them.
I refer to appendices/addendums which were part of the declaration.
Much shorter, just a paragraph each.
I've tried Wayback extensively and there is no original to read.
Just a link to the current format with FAQ's.
I have no recollection of these FAQ's originally but there are two references to the gbd on Wayback - both linking to the same URL.
One published in 2020, the other published in 2022.
Maybe 2022 was when the FAQ's were added?
Why the two publications dates for the "same" document?
Wonder if the authors, given the chance, would edit/reword the gbd in light of what we now know? I’m guessing it would likely have to be a drastically different document to reach original signatories at this point….
Bring on Event 201 followed by the disappearance of ALL pandemic response documentation across the globe followed by mass propaganda campaign via captured media, same language different dialects hit the go button & Bob's your father's brother.
Event 201 followed by removal of ALL sensible pandemic response documentation in the first instance ( this did happen) followed by mass one size fits all, world-wide, same language different dialect propaganda campaign, flu to disappear replaced by BS novel virus & Bob's your father's brother.
That was a very good breakdown. I had not revisted it myself. I think at the time I must have been glad that at least it was challenging the nonsense in some way, and was all I had observed at the time.
I have said it was helpful at the time but it might have been only in the limited sense as I did know that COVID 19 was a psy op by then, June 2020 in reality.
But rereading it I realise they are talking in the main a load of bollox. This much they say is true though:
"Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health."
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/covid-19-summary/