17 Comments
May 7Liked by Jonathan Engler

Excellent report Jonathan.

Covid-19, the disease, is nothing more than a disease of false attribution.

The COVID “virus” is a hoax which was used as a proxy to justify the massive and swift funding of new mRNA vaccine technology while indoctrinating everyone into a new medical tyranny.

COVID is really due to:

• Being healthy was relabeled as asymptomatic “COVID” due to the 100% invalid PCR test.

• Ordinary illnesses were relabeled as “COVID” due to the 100% invalid PCR test.

• Illness from severe air pollution (e.g. China and Italy) were relabeled as

“COVID” due to the 100% invalid PCR test.

• Illness due to toxic masks and toxic nasal-swabs (used in COVID tests) were relabeled as

“COVID” due to the 100% invalid PCR test.

• Illness from flu shots were relabeled as “COVID” due to the 100% invalid PCR test.

• Illness from EMF poisoning (cell phone towers, phones, WIFI, etc.) was relabeled as “COVID” due to the

100% invalid PCR test.

• Illness from the fear, stress and isolation of lockdowns was relabeled as “COVID” due to the

100% invalid PCR test.

“COVID” deaths are really due to democide i.e. “treatment” with Remdesivir, ventilators, sedatives like Midazolam, neglect etc..

A perfectly healthy individual can test “positive” for COVID and be dead after a few weeks of “treatment.”

Without a contrived virus, there could be no path to quickly force the world into a paradigm shift.

Co-Vee as seen on your Tee-Vee serves as the justification for all that we see taking place before us now. It is an artificial construct that is in reality a political weapon.

Expand full comment
May 7Liked by Jonathan Engler

Asymptomatic 'cases' led to the advertising campaigns 'Act like you've got it'....but people didn't know they had 'it' as they went about their daily lives, shopworkers etc were all potentially 'asymptomatic' but they managed to keep going, and, weren't told to stay at home. The label 'asymptomatic' was a vital element of the 'pandemic'...kept people testing! One would expect it will be key element should/ when there is another such alleged health emergency.

Expand full comment
May 7Liked by Jonathan Engler

And they kept the phony "case counts" going through mandated tests all over the country (at least in the US) at most all of the largest institutions- universities, hospital systems, etc.

Guaranteed casedemic.

Expand full comment
May 7Liked by Jonathan Engler

Yes....Ivor Cummins was highlighting that there was a casedemic once Johnson's 'moonshot' testing extravaganza got underway. School childrens' education seriously disrupted if one of their cohort tested 'positive'' ! Same things over here but some States in the US seemed to be particularly 'hot' on embedding the agenda.

Expand full comment
May 8Liked by Jonathan Engler

Correct.

One reason saliva tests were developed (for use in universities, sports teams, etc) is because it's non-invasive which a) gets around communicable disease code laws about who can be compelled to test and under what conditions, and b) allows for insane requirements likes testing 2x+/week.

Expand full comment
May 8Liked by Jonathan Engler

They were using nasal swab tests for two years.

Expand full comment
May 8Liked by Jonathan Engler

I'm talking a number of public universities/colleges (although Yale is private)

University of Illinois was the worst. And look - President Killeen was so proud of the unethical, if not illegal, data collection "saliva PCR genomics"

"...it's very exciting, because we have pioneered a new technology. It's saliva PCR, genomics essentially. And we've managed to create a system where individuals, including very young people, are prepared to give saliva samples, to be looked at for their signatures, of viral signatures. We've done that at 8 million cases. We have that data and that data is going to be publicly available and we can make all kinds of assessments about viral load, speed of recovery, age groups. It's going to have to be anonymized, of course, for patient records." https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/transcript-u-of-i-president-tim-killeens?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=web

Expand full comment

I am too not that it matters which scientifically phony test they were using.

Swab tests for two years mandatory for all students and staff twice a week.

Expand full comment

Exactly right!

The universal testing (and universal masking) was the psychology used to prepare populations for universal 'vaccination' and digital ID.

Expand full comment
May 7Liked by Jonathan Engler

Damn! I was going to chip in with we knew all this since the Spanish Flu - including the detrimental contribution of masks - and then you concluded with it! In other news, people get sick in hospital...

Expand full comment

Amazing work here. Thank you.

Expand full comment

Jonathan, why do you think there was a sudden surge of "treatable pneumonias" in some cities (and not others - in fact, the majority) after "15 Days" was declared?

Expand full comment
author

I don’t know. I suspect the phenomenon covered in this piece was just part of what was going on, and was a more relevant factor during winter 20/21 rather than spring 2020.

Expand full comment

A couple of devil's advocate points:

1. If we accept the findings of the study re pulmonary co-infection, then we accept the findings re the other pathology ("Covid-19 pneumonia").

2. The study looked at critically ill patients and hospital-acquired co-infection - not community-acquired pneumonia. So this was intensivists under-using antibiotics for secondary/ nosocomial infections (which require a high clinical index of suspicion).

What was the aetiology of respiratory failure and "diffuse alveolar damage" that put these patients into ICU in the first place?

3. "Now on the other hand, as regards “covid” at least... Whatever the signs and symptoms, a novel test identifying a genetic sequence cranked up to maximum sensitivity signifies a definite diagnosis; treat strictly using this protocol."

In early 2020, experienced emergency and ICU clinicians (not medical students) in particular locations - and not others - described a novel clinical syndrome in patients who were critically ill at presentation (with severely abnormal radiology and arterial blood gas results). At the time, PCR testing was not widely available.

----

So how do these pieces fit together?

Expand full comment

They misidentified a purportedly new syndrome is the most likely explanation.

There is no agreement about the unique signs & symptoms which characterise “covid” that aren’t seen in influenza like illnesses.

Expand full comment

But the presentation was pre-hospital sudden death in a huge number of cases:

Jessica Hockett said many thousands of people died relatively suddenly in private residences after calling ambulances in extremis according to the NYC data in early 2020. The same phenomenon reported in London. No contact with the medical system (apart from ambulance services) and the majority dead-on-arrival.

For inpatients, why would experienced critical care clinicians in certain cities (and not others) misidentify influenza? Does that mean these huge death spikes in early 2020 were due to outbreaks of influenza / bacterial pneumonia that were incorrectly treated? What caused this "outbreak" in NY/ NJ - but not the rest of the US?

Expand full comment