I just finished Mullis' autobiography, "Dancing Naked in the Mind Field"--a good book, actually. But I have to wonder if the PCR is good for ANYTHING, especially when we begin to learn that DNA sequences of viruses used for calibration are developed from "particles" that have never been actually isolated. It's smoke and turtles all the way down, yes?
Given that the PCR test has been exposed as a totally flawed measurement tool and given there is no evidence for the existence of viruses, the thing that the PCR test is claimed to measure, why is it necessary to spend any time on this whatsoever? It looks very much like all the PCR test provides is a crude indicator of ionic strength. Jamie Andrews has written about this. The fact is there is no proof of what it measures. It appears to me that several billion people were convinced to stick what is nothing more than a piece of litmus paper with lots of biochemical electronic bells and whistles attached to it up their noses. Fool me one, shame on you. Fool me twice shame on me. The people who use these tests, especially when it is for their living, are hardly likely to be the ones who will point out, or are able to see its abject failings.
My interest lies mainly in the contribution of the PCR test to narrative development, not so much in the nuts and bolts of the test. (I agree it is practically worthless, however technically correctly it may be executed, for a whole variety of reasons.)
However, it was a vital and key tool (alongside propaganda) in staging the pandemic, and I do regard it as legitimate and important to study the who, how and when of what happened with it.
I note that you were an editor of the review, and a friend / colleague / associate of Bobby Malhotra's. It would be good if you could get him to respond to Jessica's tweet from a couple of weeks ago:
Hi Howard. In addition to Jonathan's request, because you were a copy editor on the Corman Drosten Review (Borger et al), you are in a good position to answer a question about the Authors vs the Contributors, as shown in the "initial block."
Two authors (Clare Craig and Bruno Carbonare) do not have contributions listed. One contributor (Roger Van something) has contributions listed but is not an author.
My interpretation of the "mismatch" is that Ms Craig and Mr Carbonare signed on later than other authors, as endorsers, but did not make substantial contributions or offer feedback that changed anything
With Roger V, he contributed but - for whatever reason - could not or did not want to be listed as an author.
There is also the possibility of error (editing neglected to list CC and BC contributions).
Thank you.
Does this shocking article mean that the whole edifice of the plandemic scam was literally built on nothing? Am I understanding correctly?
They rebranded the 'flu. Everything flowing from it was a scam.
It appears you are, read this substack from Dr. Engler from last year regarding a whooping cough "epidemic" in 2006 connected to the pcr test.
https://open.substack.com/pub/sanityunleashed/p/false-positive-pcr-driven-pseudo?r=xxauv&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false
Thank you! Actually read about that before, not sure it was Dr Engler’s article. Will follow the link now.
I just finished Mullis' autobiography, "Dancing Naked in the Mind Field"--a good book, actually. But I have to wonder if the PCR is good for ANYTHING, especially when we begin to learn that DNA sequences of viruses used for calibration are developed from "particles" that have never been actually isolated. It's smoke and turtles all the way down, yes?
Yep, PCR makes no sense from the beginning.
They're amplifying something they can't measure to measure it. 😂
https://robc137.substack.com/p/pcr-fails-logic-from-the-start-sorry
I checked out the post and subscribed. Some interesting stuff. Thanks.
Given that the PCR test has been exposed as a totally flawed measurement tool and given there is no evidence for the existence of viruses, the thing that the PCR test is claimed to measure, why is it necessary to spend any time on this whatsoever? It looks very much like all the PCR test provides is a crude indicator of ionic strength. Jamie Andrews has written about this. The fact is there is no proof of what it measures. It appears to me that several billion people were convinced to stick what is nothing more than a piece of litmus paper with lots of biochemical electronic bells and whistles attached to it up their noses. Fool me one, shame on you. Fool me twice shame on me. The people who use these tests, especially when it is for their living, are hardly likely to be the ones who will point out, or are able to see its abject failings.
My interest lies mainly in the contribution of the PCR test to narrative development, not so much in the nuts and bolts of the test. (I agree it is practically worthless, however technically correctly it may be executed, for a whole variety of reasons.)
However, it was a vital and key tool (alongside propaganda) in staging the pandemic, and I do regard it as legitimate and important to study the who, how and when of what happened with it.
I note that you were an editor of the review, and a friend / colleague / associate of Bobby Malhotra's. It would be good if you could get him to respond to Jessica's tweet from a couple of weeks ago:
https://x.com/Wood_House76/status/1955615043875131748
Thanks
Hi Jonathan, thanks, I’ll respond to you on TG about this and another topic.
Hi Howard. In addition to Jonathan's request, because you were a copy editor on the Corman Drosten Review (Borger et al), you are in a good position to answer a question about the Authors vs the Contributors, as shown in the "initial block."
Two authors (Clare Craig and Bruno Carbonare) do not have contributions listed. One contributor (Roger Van something) has contributions listed but is not an author.
My interpretation of the "mismatch" is that Ms Craig and Mr Carbonare signed on later than other authors, as endorsers, but did not make substantial contributions or offer feedback that changed anything
With Roger V, he contributed but - for whatever reason - could not or did not want to be listed as an author.
There is also the possibility of error (editing neglected to list CC and BC contributions).
Would appreciate any insights you have on that.
Thanks.
Adding comment/question to HS from Substack Notes: https://substack.com/profile/32813354-jessica-hockett/note/c-149843382?utm_source=notes-share-action&r=jjay2
HS reply https://substack.com/@howard366646/note/c-149902335?r=jjay2&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
JH reply to HS https://substack.com/@jessicahockett/note/c-150243349?utm_source=notes-share-action&r=jjay2
I remember later in the year that a group of scientists did a deep dive into the development of the covid pcr test.