- "breakthroughs are very common - and great for super-immunity"
Yes, negative efficacy in a pharmaceutical product is actually a GOOD thing!
Then the psy-op went into over-drive when mass vaccine failure meant the 'pandemic' continued, and policies of mass-masking, mass-testing and two weeks mandatory 'isolation' of the 'fully-vaccinated' took hold - and a booster was widely mandated*.
The 'pandemic' that Australia avoided started AFTER the worse-than-useless vaccines.
*Plus anti-virals with negative efficacy were added into the mix. It's normal to catch Covid when taking Paxlovid, after all. It means it's working. You just need to take it for longer.
Have you a link to a media piece which says "breakthroughs are very common - and great for super-immunity" - would love to repost that. It is truly ridiculous.
In "Zero Covid" Australia, the "breakthrough cases" exploded in December 2021 in the 95% fully-vaccinated adult population.
The response? RAT tests, masks, boosters, Paxlovid.... and mandatory reporting of positive at-home tests with 2 weeks mandatory isolation. In the "fully vaccinated". Early 2022 - ie. AFTER the vaccine rollout - was the period of maximal workforce problems during the 'pandemic' because of absenteeism - not due to illness, but mandatory 'isolation' based on RAT results.
In effect, a 'pandemic' with lockdowns-by-stealth.
"Yes, negative efficacy in a pharmaceutical product is actually a GOOD thing! "
I have a theory that perhaps the vaccine was so bad that it did the opposite of Marek's disease, and pushed evolution to favor the far milder Omicron. If that is the case it might have actually ended the pandemic, but for completely different reasons from what we were told.
It is worth mentioning that this experiment was also done on seronegative volunteers, and some of them indeed got infected (footnote 12 of the study). This demonstrates that natural immunity is robust and durable, but people without signs of previous infection are indeed more susceptible.
None of this will convince Bret Weinstein one bit. He still swears by his bandana/goggles combo plus his routine of fully undressing at the front door when returning from being outside.
The no-virus message is now known to most of the major players but we are getting diminishing returns now. Various World Councils or People's Health movements are concentrating on the lab leak theory and are sticking to the virus hypothesis to explain disease.
The fake isolation procedures have been thoroughly exposed and they even know about this but don't seem to care, simply claiming that despite lack of proof, the idea of pathogenic particles still seems the most likely cause.
The reasons they themselves give are:
1. They believe that the precise ordering of base pairs of RNA or DNA can carry sufficient information to create Life itself.
2. Lack of any credible alternative cause of disease
3. An innate confidence in the integrity of their own knowledge. They imagine that their knowledge of biology is essentially complete with only the details to be worked out.
We therefore need to address these misconceptions:
1. The ordering of DNA base pairs has no biological significance
DNA is not the blueprint for life
DNA mutations are not random.
Natural selection plays little to no part in evolution
2. An alternative approach to determining the cause of disease
Influenza and many other diseases correlate heavily with the season, weather, latitude and specific location and not so much with any quality of the individual. The cause must therefore have something to do with these.
Flu is the disruption of a primarily electromagnetic regulatory system by seasonal changes in the Earth's magnetic field.
3. Current knowledge of biological systems is woefully inadequate. Scientists have not even worked out how the circuatory system works. The blood is not pumped around by the heart according to 150 years of research at least. Nobody knows how this works and there seems to be no reasonable explanation within the accepted limits of biology, physics or hydraulic engineering.
This is a surely a major embarrassment and enough to instill some level of 'sobriety' into anyone who looks into the problem.
This video that I created during the early stages of the pandemic has stood the test of time very well. I developed further concepts on the transmission of respiratory viruses in my Substack newsletter: https://youtu.be/VocSzs4yxLU
Btw re the video I would have concluded the same as you at that time but I think you’ve just missed the conclusion.
You correctly cite extraordinary synchronicity and the fact that it must have been already widespread, but these features clearly point towards blanket policy related harm and not the spread of a pathogen.
This is the link to my opening article. Most of this lengthy 6 part article I still standby but subsequent information / data has emerged that has modified my thinking. If you have the time to read these articles I am sure that It will be food for thought.
Remember the flip from
- "you won't get Covid" >>
- "breakthroughs are very rare" >>
- "breakthroughs are very common - and great for super-immunity"
Yes, negative efficacy in a pharmaceutical product is actually a GOOD thing!
Then the psy-op went into over-drive when mass vaccine failure meant the 'pandemic' continued, and policies of mass-masking, mass-testing and two weeks mandatory 'isolation' of the 'fully-vaccinated' took hold - and a booster was widely mandated*.
The 'pandemic' that Australia avoided started AFTER the worse-than-useless vaccines.
*Plus anti-virals with negative efficacy were added into the mix. It's normal to catch Covid when taking Paxlovid, after all. It means it's working. You just need to take it for longer.
Have you a link to a media piece which says "breakthroughs are very common - and great for super-immunity" - would love to repost that. It is truly ridiculous.
Yep! Only a slight embellishment for effect, the "super immunity" FARCE had a dual purpose:
1. Initially - to market vaccine failure (including NEGATIVE efficacy) as a benefit
2. As the rollout progressed - to coerce the naturally-immune to get vaccinated
Also known as "hybrid immunity" - a hitherto unknown medical term prior to 2021.
Will try to find one of the TV doctor links, but here are a few examples of the "science":
- New study suggests two paths toward ‘super immunity’ to COVID-19
https://news.ohsu.edu/2022/01/25/new-study-suggests-two-paths-toward-super-immunity-to-covid-19
- Breakthrough COVID powers up immune response to variants — including Omicron
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-00328-8
- Hybrid immunity is the best protection against COVID-19, researchers find
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/01/230120131249.htm
Yes..it's a total farce.
In "Zero Covid" Australia, the "breakthrough cases" exploded in December 2021 in the 95% fully-vaccinated adult population.
The response? RAT tests, masks, boosters, Paxlovid.... and mandatory reporting of positive at-home tests with 2 weeks mandatory isolation. In the "fully vaccinated". Early 2022 - ie. AFTER the vaccine rollout - was the period of maximal workforce problems during the 'pandemic' because of absenteeism - not due to illness, but mandatory 'isolation' based on RAT results.
In effect, a 'pandemic' with lockdowns-by-stealth.
https://www.unsw.edu.au/newsroom/news/2022/01/3-problems-fines-not-reporting-positive-covid-tests
You gotta love that the word “omicron” is an anagram for moronic.
Straight from the expert's mouth!
Offit even refers to (lack of) "protection from asymptomatic infection" several times. If you can believe that.
https://www.facebook.com/droz/videos/super-immunity-to-covid-19/453823782543936/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2uuNF-rsA7I
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lf7Ndmki1I4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nOAAPUzC0o
Other - media
https://www.cbsnews.com/video/covid-natural-immunity-can-be-as-strong-as-vaccine/
https://www.facebook.com/FoxNewsVideo/videos/dr-saphier-answers-important-covid-questions/270992468392174/
3 minute mark. How much was this TV doctor (a radiologist) paid to pump out this garbage?
https://www.facebook.com/FoxNewsVideo/videos/dr-saphier-answers-important-covid-questions/270992468392174/
There was a clip with another American MD - even more ridiculous. Will try to find it.
"Yes, negative efficacy in a pharmaceutical product is actually a GOOD thing! "
I have a theory that perhaps the vaccine was so bad that it did the opposite of Marek's disease, and pushed evolution to favor the far milder Omicron. If that is the case it might have actually ended the pandemic, but for completely different reasons from what we were told.
The idea that IM injections can influence the evolution of respiratory coronaviruses is pretty far-fetched IMO.
I think all we are seeing are increasingly damaged immune systems.
The "variants" are just a figment of testing using
consensus-based sequencing into a constantly mutating swarm.
There was also a theory that Omicron was a deliberate release by a white hat
William of Ockham would probably have a thing or one to say about it too!
Kinda makes it a poor choice for a bioweapon eh? “But but Furin cleavage sites and HIV inserts!” Gain Of Fiction.
"claim of function" as Nick Hudson says
Poor choice for a bioweapon, but a great choice for a decoy
Yet more evidence of what I've been saying since day one.
https://substack.com/profile/93629334-paramaniac/note/c-55580648
It is worth mentioning that this experiment was also done on seronegative volunteers, and some of them indeed got infected (footnote 12 of the study). This demonstrates that natural immunity is robust and durable, but people without signs of previous infection are indeed more susceptible.
Fantastic as usual Jonathan, thanks again!
Any chance you could pass on this info to those two drips Gert & Phil Macmillan?
Am I a doctor for questioning what we know?
No I am not.
Do I need to be a doctor to question what is known?
No I do not.
None of this will convince Bret Weinstein one bit. He still swears by his bandana/goggles combo plus his routine of fully undressing at the front door when returning from being outside.
The Way Forward.
The no-virus message is now known to most of the major players but we are getting diminishing returns now. Various World Councils or People's Health movements are concentrating on the lab leak theory and are sticking to the virus hypothesis to explain disease.
The fake isolation procedures have been thoroughly exposed and they even know about this but don't seem to care, simply claiming that despite lack of proof, the idea of pathogenic particles still seems the most likely cause.
The reasons they themselves give are:
1. They believe that the precise ordering of base pairs of RNA or DNA can carry sufficient information to create Life itself.
2. Lack of any credible alternative cause of disease
3. An innate confidence in the integrity of their own knowledge. They imagine that their knowledge of biology is essentially complete with only the details to be worked out.
We therefore need to address these misconceptions:
1. The ordering of DNA base pairs has no biological significance
DNA is not the blueprint for life
DNA mutations are not random.
Natural selection plays little to no part in evolution
Evolution of form is decoupled from that of genes
DNA is not the physical substance of inheritance
https://library-of-atlantis.com/2023/07/06/the-dna-delusion/
Best guess for DNA is an energy buffer as described by Stefan Lanka
https://library-of-atlantis.com/2024/04/14/stefan-lanka-on-dna/
2. An alternative approach to determining the cause of disease
Influenza and many other diseases correlate heavily with the season, weather, latitude and specific location and not so much with any quality of the individual. The cause must therefore have something to do with these.
Flu is the disruption of a primarily electromagnetic regulatory system by seasonal changes in the Earth's magnetic field.
https://library-of-atlantis.com/2024/06/13/influenza-and-weather/
https://library-of-atlantis.com/2024/10/09/influenza-is-not-contagious/
3. Current knowledge of biological systems is woefully inadequate. Scientists have not even worked out how the circuatory system works. The blood is not pumped around by the heart according to 150 years of research at least. Nobody knows how this works and there seems to be no reasonable explanation within the accepted limits of biology, physics or hydraulic engineering.
This is a surely a major embarrassment and enough to instill some level of 'sobriety' into anyone who looks into the problem.
https://library-of-atlantis.com/the-heart-is-not-a-pump/
https://library-of-atlantis.com/2024/09/29/the-blood-can-circulate-by-itself/
This video that I created during the early stages of the pandemic has stood the test of time very well. I developed further concepts on the transmission of respiratory viruses in my Substack newsletter: https://youtu.be/VocSzs4yxLU
What’s your substack link?
Btw re the video I would have concluded the same as you at that time but I think you’ve just missed the conclusion.
You correctly cite extraordinary synchronicity and the fact that it must have been already widespread, but these features clearly point towards blanket policy related harm and not the spread of a pathogen.
Jonathan
This is the link to my opening article. Most of this lengthy 6 part article I still standby but subsequent information / data has emerged that has modified my thinking. If you have the time to read these articles I am sure that It will be food for thought.
https://open.substack.com/pub/sandrews/p/were-charles-darwin-and-robert-edgar-232?r=16e1vo&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Steve
“It just means they’re working.”
—Smug-faced virtue-signaling bossypants three-letter science-worshiping bureaupath who really wants you dead to save the planet
It would have been so much worse.
Indeed. Much.