Three persistent problems in the pandemic narrative nobody wants to address
No real pushback, just capitulation disguised as dissent.
Surveying the landscape of current COVID-related events and conversations, we see three persistent problems with the pandemic narrative that nobody wants to address.
Each one is related to the use and mis-use of PCR testing.
1. The“appearance” of a novel pathogen causal of a new disease.
In a discussion this morning on X, Jonathan pointed out that even if PCR protocols and the sequencing of found things is an entirely valid science, the pandemic narrative not only presumes a one-to-one relation between pathogen and illness (ie., this detected entity is alone in causing a new disease), but also that nasopharyngeal swabbing is relevant to any serious illness in the lungs.
A short article on these same points and associated studies can be found here:
A longer piece with Martin Neil and Norman Fenton plumbs the depths of the topic further:
2. The “disappearance” of influenza
Yesterday Robert Malone (now an ACIP member) asked a CDC representative about the sudden and prolonged “disappearance” of influenza. We do not for one moment think that Dr Malone is anything other than fully committed to preserving the need for “pandemic preparedness”, and view his asking of the question entirely “scripted” and “theatrical”.
The response from Vivien Dugan, director of the CDC influenza division, is predictably nonsensical. She basically claimed that reduced contact and other NPIs caused the disappearance (only) of other respiratory pathogens, seemingly relying on the notion that “SARS-CoV-2” wiped out all other causes of influenza-like illnesses.
Why the “new virus” didn’t manage to defeat its “competitors” until countries deployed mass testing for it is never explained but is an important concept to grasp since - in our view and as Jonathan articulated in the article below - flu “had” to vanish in order for the “new virus” to seem very powerful, in need of special treatments and a shot.
Human interference in the form of shifts in testing priorities and directives given to hospitals and doctors are obvious culprits of the disappearing act. See here for a whole series of articles on the “vanishing flu” trope.
The role of various SARS-CoV-2 and RVP (Respiratory Viral Panel) tests must also be investigated. Same goes for the expansion of flu surveillance and shifts in coding pneumonia deaths, apparent in U.S. data, which Jessica probed in the article below.
3. Pandemic propagation
Also from the ACIP meetings: A CDC staffer gave a presentation with a message to the effect of “everything is fine with the covid vaccines”.
Children’s Health Defense reported that ACIP committee members pushed back hard against this claim. In our view, they did no such thing. As Jonathan stated via Substack Note, the “pushback” was incredibly muted and no one is questioning whether a new disease came into existence, or whether it can be reliably or meaningfully diagnosed via PCR test.
By avoiding any criticism of the PCR test as the basis for propagating and maintaining the state of pandemicity, the ACIP took great care to only push back within the constraints of what we’ve termed “permitted dissent”. (Explanation and examples here.)
It’s truly incredible that we’re at the end of June 2025 and it is still considered “out of bounds” to question whether a pandemic declaration was justified at all.
What others see as pushback, we see as capitulation – and therefore cannot agree (with this article, for example) that pressure is being applied or “dialed up”.
 | A guest post by
|
 | A guest post by
|
My belief is that the most basic fundamental assumptions upon which massive fallacies are built are typically erroneous yet rarely examined critically. I mean everyone “knows” there was a novel virus spreading, and that “tests” proved that you were “infected” and that whatever was causing “positive” tests was going to make you sick and also sicken others. As you point out and have done so repeatedly, every bit of this statement is incorrect and hence there was no pandemic. Most people observed ample evidence of this, as positive tests were often not followed by illness and if they were, there was never any proven causation. Family members never became ill. If they did, there was no distinction between their symptoms and other respiratory syndromes. Hospitals were “overloaded” yet in your community no one was sick much less severely ill. All the lab vs wet market, Sweden vs the world, death dashboards, dancing doctors, closed schools, masks, distancing etc etc were just distractions serving to ensure most folks never questioned the most basic assumptions.
the whole thing was perhaps the biggest hoax on mankind worldwide.
Who knows who was responsible, but I am very sure it was because "Trump needs to go" These people are completely mentally destroyed and they inflicted their insanity on so many lives, so many people.