Government worked hand-in-hand with broadcasters to push the pandemic narrative.
This article appeared in the Daily Telegraph a week or so ago.
The first point which needs making is that it was pretty shoddy of Sarah Knapton to fail to acknowledge the source of the FOI documents on which she bases her article.
is, quite understandably, quite cross about that, as he makes clear here.It appears that Ms Knapton has claimed that she retrieved the information from “What do They Know”, but Lewis states - with compelling evidence - that this is plainly untrue.
Anyway, what of the actual FOI request and the response?
The request made was this:
I am making this request under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and seek details of any government collaboration with UK television production companies regarding scriptwriting, storyline guidance, or messaging influence within fictional TV programs.
I request records from January 2020 to the present that relate to:
Agreements, contracts, or official documents outlining collaboration between any UK government department (including but not limited to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS), Cabinet Office, and UKHSA) and TV production companies regarding:
Incorporating public health messaging (COVID-19, vaccinations, mental health). Storylines reflecting government initiatives (climate policy, migration, extremism, social cohesion).
Copies of any finalised strategy reports or briefings where government officials discussed how to influence narratives in widely watched fictional TV programs such as EastEnders, Coronation Street, Emmerdale, and Hollyoaks.
Any government funding agreements, payments, or sponsorships given to TV production companies in exchange for incorporating specific narratives.
This was the reponse:
As you will see, huge swathes are redacted (the vast majority, in fact). That said, there are still some interesting findings.
I highly recommend (subject to one point - see below) Lewis’s substack article and embedded video where he goes through the document, though I am not sure why these are termed “leaked emails”, when they were released (albeit after lengthy delay and heavily redacted) under FOI legislation:
There is no doubt that the UK government acted hand-in-hand with mainstream broadcasters to push approved messaging about all matters “pandemic” related, including lockdowns and vaccines.
Given that the entire “pandemic” was - to all intents and purposes - a declaration of war by governments against the citizenry, and run like or actually as a military operation, I personally don’t find any of this at all surprising.
Both Sarah Knapton and Lewis Brackpool wrongly interpret one important point.
Sarah Knapton says this in the Daily Telegraph piece:
However, it seems highly likely to me that the person who typed up the minutes starting on the first page, or whoever wrote the header to that briefing note when compiling the FOI response, has simply made a typo here (resulting in this part of the response coming at the front when placed into chronological order).
I think it’s pretty obvious that 2020 there should read 2021, because:
2 Feb and 5 Jan were Sundays in 2020 but weekdays in 2021
I am very happy to entertain all sorts of conspiracies but I suspect “further C-19 measures” would have been written in 2021 not 2020
The 2nd document - an email - appears to be referring to the same briefing and is dated 5 Feb 2021:
In his video, Lewis doesn’t actually made direct reference to the date on the first page, and by not mentioning it I think we can assume he has taken the date at face value (as did Sarah Knapton).
None of this, by the way, makes me think any better of our governments. I strongly suspect that the desire to roll out mRNA technologies was a major driver behind the faked pandemic, and governments willingly and actively participated in the scam.
But the people meeting with broadcasters wouldn’t be that high up in the food chain, and if they were, the idea that they’d decide to mention vaccines to mere broadcasters in early 2020, or discuss “further C-19 measures” on 5 Jan 2020, is fanciful.
People need to understand that the world is capitalist for the benefit of the transnational ruling class. COVID was a test class war attack on global humanity. COVID may be used again to quash proletariat uprising against poverty.
The ruling class owns and controls the media, governments, institutions, academia and the judiciary, and the police and military exist to protect the RC. When we switch on the television we do not hear the voice of the people. We hear the voice of the ruling class.
Google also serves the RC, hence constant reminders of new variants of COVID which are future forms of insurance against revolution. See the cultural hegemony. Absolutely had enough of childlike bourgeois critique.
Without the fear-mongering propaganda campaign no one would’ve noticed anything unusual about the Spring 2020 "flu season" as there was nothing unusual happening, except for the criminal, murderous, lockdown policies and "health protocols" in response to a non- existent threat.
I have currently laid out a very thorough history and chronology of the bio-security state and how we got here which includes a day by day and month by month review of the events of 2020.
Parts One and Two cover the history from 1999-2019.
Part Three of that chronology covers 2020 on a day by day month by month basis. Here is the first installation of that piece which covers the month of January:
https://healthfreedomdefense.org/timeline-to-covid-tyranny-part-three-2020-jan/
Here is the second installation of that piece which covers the month of February:
https://healthfreedomdefense.org/timeline-to-covid-tyranny-part-three-2020-feb/
As one can see if they go through the chronology there literally was nothing happening even as told by the mainstream media stories. They simply made it up.
The March 2020 edition will be published next week.
The covid campaign was not an isolated episode but, rather, a highly organized undertaking disguised as a public health emergency. This multi-faceted structural event was the culmination of the Deep State’s decades-old determination to institute a raft of invasive policies—including the worldwide suspension of basic civil liberties—to salvage their crumbling financial empire and usher in a complete transformation of society.
Another of the major components of this terror operation was to greatly reduce the gargantuan problem of trillions in unfunded liabilities facing all Western financial systems. This meant eliminating large swathes of disabled and elderly people who rely on government assistance and/or pensions.