Very well said! And why Dr Stefan Lanka has argued that the word "virus" should be eliminated from discussion altogether; we have been living in the pseudo reality, the false matrix built on the lies and deception of unproven science since the 1800s and earlier; real scientists using the scientific method had their work and lives systematically destroyed in order to preserve the fake science(allopathic medicine) which keeps money and power for the few at the expense of sickness and death for the rest of us.
Dead right. This is at the heart of modern propaganda, which has become so widespread. Present the public with two competing ideas, both of which are wrong. The BBC do this all the time. It’s very clever, because most people are either unable to judge between the two options, or only have enough knowledge to realise that just one of them is wrong.
Yes, and very often the reframe comes in the form of a poll on "what the American people think, or approve of." The media is feeding you what you should think, or not think about anything. They also use experts, so they are often inviting you to fall into a number of logical fallacies, from appeal to experts, bandwagon, sunk costs, straw man arguments, etc., all brought to you by the mass media.
2,000 years ago this strategy was said, “be clever as a serpent, harmless as a dove”.
In order to not fight Tribalize Divide and Conquer powers that be with your hands tied behind your back. Binary choices are for 2D chess players in 2D Flatland, governed by tunnel vision Adrenaline and Cortisol. The death and aging hormones forcing 3D common sense from the frontal cortex down into the 2D binary reptilian brain. The Amygdala.
“But I kint regalate my heart beat, thar’s a mountain lyin’ on my chest!”~ Ricky Bobby, Talladega Nights
Since I’m not permitted to comment on Jessica’s substack, I think yours will do. I only care about two people here: You and Mike Yeadon becuse both of you have conscience, as far as I can tell… :-)
False Binaries”? Why?
It is clear that those behind the so-called "scamdemic" insisted on promoting false binaries as the only options to be discussed among so-called experts, effectively keeping the conversation away from deeper truths. However, I believe the issues at play here go much deeper than just an overly hyped seasonal flu rebranded as COVID-19.
Fauci’s own quotes offer some insight:
“I represent science. I represent the scientific community. I represent the public health community. So, when they go after me, they're going after science. Because I am science. I mean, that's what it is. So, they’re really attacking science.”
“I’m not going to be around forever, but science is going to be here forever.”
These statements suggest that what was truly at stake was not just public health policy, but the credibility of science itself—something Fauci seemed deeply concerned about. The origins of the pandemic could have followed one of two narratives: a natural spillover event or a lab-based gain-of-function (GoF) scenario. But beyond that binary, the broader issue was whether science, as a modern institution, could admit to being wrong.
If science had failed to identify the true origins of SARS-CoV-2, what else might be called into question? Millions around the world continue to support scientific research, often without scrutiny, because taxpayers generally trust science. In many ways, scientists in white lab coats have become the modern equivalent of priests—figures of authority on "truth."
Before Darwin, few paid serious attention to science, as that role was largely reserved for priests in robes who claimed divine insight. But with the advent of figures like Darwin and Einstein, the mantle of truth was handed to the scientific establishment. If this modern religion of science—or scientism—were to fail or be discredited, where would people turn? Would society revert to beliefs from 400 years ago, before Copernicus challenged the geocentric worldview?
I was going to write you what most of what I know on the matter of covid-19 so far… but then it hit me: Do you, or don’t believe the SARS CoV-2 “spike protein” is killing people doing…whatever the narrative is currently?
I believe your analysis of fake binaries to be inadequate and lacking important facts. None of your alternatives seem to me to account for all the facts, are thus not productive and will mislead your readers.
If there were no virus, or agent of some kind, how do you account for the unusual white clots that form both in the vaccinated and in those who have had a bad infection. They are known to be amyloid and have tested positive for prion formation too. They are biologically novel.
McCairn says that it is becoming hard to find blood that does not show signs of microclotting.
Pretorius' work has made progress on depicting this amyloid pathology.
Are you going to dismiss all biomedical evidence? Isn't it time to move on from these tired old arguments and alternatives?
These fibrinoid microclots have been found in children whose only exposure was to a vaccination in utero.
Amyloidogenic Fibrin Microclotting Following Prenatal mRNA Vaccination Exposure
None of the papers presented as evidence for that effect in the unvaccinated are the least bit convincing, and are, moreover uncontrolled experiments of unknown / questionable clinical relevance.
I know literally nobody who is unvaccinated whose health is any different to how it was before the fake pandemic - and I know a LOT of unvaccinated people.
"McCairn says that it is becoming hard to find blood that does not show signs of microclotting." Well that clinches it !!!
I know someone who works in the UK Blood Transfusion Service (and is very anti- the covid narrative) responsible for handling many thousands of samples who assure me there have been no such observations.
"I know someone who works in the UK Blood Transfusion Service (and is very anti- the covid narrative) responsible for handling many thousands of samples who assure me there have been no such observations."
Can you provide any evidence of this statement? Who is this person and what tests has this person carried out?
Pretty excellent.
Whether all Venezuelan people are dog molesters or not is - for example - not a false binary.
It’s clear case of lie versus truth.
The notion of a replication competent intercellular parasite transmissible and pathogenic is a similar case.
It’s a total fairytale. Renaming something else with the word poison (virus) is not useful.
Virus means poison and then went on to mean a pathogen.
There is no use in this word. Viruses are as fictional as space badgers. They were plucked from the air to salvage a falsified germ theory.
They are as real as the climate emergency.
Here is another example where it is not a false binary. It is simply a lie to say that humans are causing catastrophic climate change.
It is simply a lie to suggest virology is other than fairytale pseudoscience in every single respect.
https://open.substack.com/pub/beyondcertainty/p/lazy-and-gullible-or-something-else
Very well said! And why Dr Stefan Lanka has argued that the word "virus" should be eliminated from discussion altogether; we have been living in the pseudo reality, the false matrix built on the lies and deception of unproven science since the 1800s and earlier; real scientists using the scientific method had their work and lives systematically destroyed in order to preserve the fake science(allopathic medicine) which keeps money and power for the few at the expense of sickness and death for the rest of us.
Dead right. This is at the heart of modern propaganda, which has become so widespread. Present the public with two competing ideas, both of which are wrong. The BBC do this all the time. It’s very clever, because most people are either unable to judge between the two options, or only have enough knowledge to realise that just one of them is wrong.
Yes, and very often the reframe comes in the form of a poll on "what the American people think, or approve of." The media is feeding you what you should think, or not think about anything. They also use experts, so they are often inviting you to fall into a number of logical fallacies, from appeal to experts, bandwagon, sunk costs, straw man arguments, etc., all brought to you by the mass media.
2,000 years ago this strategy was said, “be clever as a serpent, harmless as a dove”.
In order to not fight Tribalize Divide and Conquer powers that be with your hands tied behind your back. Binary choices are for 2D chess players in 2D Flatland, governed by tunnel vision Adrenaline and Cortisol. The death and aging hormones forcing 3D common sense from the frontal cortex down into the 2D binary reptilian brain. The Amygdala.
“But I kint regalate my heart beat, thar’s a mountain lyin’ on my chest!”~ Ricky Bobby, Talladega Nights
Since I’m not permitted to comment on Jessica’s substack, I think yours will do. I only care about two people here: You and Mike Yeadon becuse both of you have conscience, as far as I can tell… :-)
False Binaries”? Why?
It is clear that those behind the so-called "scamdemic" insisted on promoting false binaries as the only options to be discussed among so-called experts, effectively keeping the conversation away from deeper truths. However, I believe the issues at play here go much deeper than just an overly hyped seasonal flu rebranded as COVID-19.
Fauci’s own quotes offer some insight:
“I represent science. I represent the scientific community. I represent the public health community. So, when they go after me, they're going after science. Because I am science. I mean, that's what it is. So, they’re really attacking science.”
“I’m not going to be around forever, but science is going to be here forever.”
These statements suggest that what was truly at stake was not just public health policy, but the credibility of science itself—something Fauci seemed deeply concerned about. The origins of the pandemic could have followed one of two narratives: a natural spillover event or a lab-based gain-of-function (GoF) scenario. But beyond that binary, the broader issue was whether science, as a modern institution, could admit to being wrong.
If science had failed to identify the true origins of SARS-CoV-2, what else might be called into question? Millions around the world continue to support scientific research, often without scrutiny, because taxpayers generally trust science. In many ways, scientists in white lab coats have become the modern equivalent of priests—figures of authority on "truth."
Before Darwin, few paid serious attention to science, as that role was largely reserved for priests in robes who claimed divine insight. But with the advent of figures like Darwin and Einstein, the mantle of truth was handed to the scientific establishment. If this modern religion of science—or scientism—were to fail or be discredited, where would people turn? Would society revert to beliefs from 400 years ago, before Copernicus challenged the geocentric worldview?
Today, someone wrote this in a group, which would seem to be a good maxim.
“Anything that does not properly recognise the uncertainty in itself is garbage.“
This make little sense to me…
I was going to write you what most of what I know on the matter of covid-19 so far… but then it hit me: Do you, or don’t believe the SARS CoV-2 “spike protein” is killing people doing…whatever the narrative is currently?
I thought you’d said you were taking a break from writing…???
So good hearing (reading) from you, Dr. Engler.
I believe your analysis of fake binaries to be inadequate and lacking important facts. None of your alternatives seem to me to account for all the facts, are thus not productive and will mislead your readers.
If there were no virus, or agent of some kind, how do you account for the unusual white clots that form both in the vaccinated and in those who have had a bad infection. They are known to be amyloid and have tested positive for prion formation too. They are biologically novel.
McCairn says that it is becoming hard to find blood that does not show signs of microclotting.
Pretorius' work has made progress on depicting this amyloid pathology.
Are you going to dismiss all biomedical evidence? Isn't it time to move on from these tired old arguments and alternatives?
These fibrinoid microclots have been found in children whose only exposure was to a vaccination in utero.
Amyloidogenic Fibrin Microclotting Following Prenatal mRNA Vaccination Exposure
https://kevinwmccairnphd282302.substack.com/p/amyloidogenic-fibrin-microclotting
A central role for amyloid fibrin microclots in long COVID/PASC: origins and therapeutic implications
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35195253/
None of the papers presented as evidence for that effect in the unvaccinated are the least bit convincing, and are, moreover uncontrolled experiments of unknown / questionable clinical relevance.
I know literally nobody who is unvaccinated whose health is any different to how it was before the fake pandemic - and I know a LOT of unvaccinated people.
"McCairn says that it is becoming hard to find blood that does not show signs of microclotting." Well that clinches it !!!
I know someone who works in the UK Blood Transfusion Service (and is very anti- the covid narrative) responsible for handling many thousands of samples who assure me there have been no such observations.
"I know someone who works in the UK Blood Transfusion Service (and is very anti- the covid narrative) responsible for handling many thousands of samples who assure me there have been no such observations."
Can you provide any evidence of this statement? Who is this person and what tests has this person carried out?
Nope. But then you just quoted from someone called McCairn - without evidence either.
I don't think you're here to debate in good faith. Bye.
Objection: Irrelevant.
The false binaries and exemplars of "Off Limits" perspectives are in no way framed or intended to capture all "facts"/fact candidates.
Did you read the full article?