Cock-up, Conspiracy or Murmuration?
Hugh Willbourn's 2021 essay still reads well today.
It’s obviously de rigeur within (some sections of) what can loosely be called “the freedom movement” to interpret the events of the last few years as a conspiracy to cause deliberate harm and as part of a coordinated plan to install a totalitarian one-world government.
To be frank, I am unsure of where I stand on many of these issues (by which I do not mean to understate the extent of the harms wrought on the world and the dangers we are in).
However, what I am sure of is that we have seen a combination of greed, ideological groupthink and reckless / callous disregard as to harms caused.
All things told, whatever the organisational structures behind “the event”, that is more than enough in my book for us all to get much more angry about what has happened than appears to be the case.
On the question of cock-up versus conspiracy, I offer up this article by High Willbourn from 2021:
Obviously, the article is from 3 years ago and much has emerged since. Regardless, I do feel it contains some observations and themes which are still relevant today. It would be interesting to hear what the author thinks today.
You may also want to listen to the podcast linked within this article:
Towards the end,
and delve into more philosophical questions about the drivers of the covid event, posing the question as to whether to some extent it came about as a product of the flaws in human nature.Let’s try to get some sort of discussion going around these themes in the comments below.
Update 1:
Some of the comments below pertain to whether or not there was actually a pandemic at all. Obviously there was not, and I have written extensively on that:
Whilst overlapping, that is an entirely different point from the main discussion intended - about the organisational structure behind the covid event.
Update 2.
Having read and considered the comments made so far (ie by 4 Nov 19.30 UK time), these are my thoughts:
I am pleased I posted this as it has generated a lot of very interesting comments.
I agree with the general tone of the majority of comments posted, which is that there are facets to the timeline which stretch credulity for this to have been an entirely emergent event.
That is not to say that the elements identified in the essay I posted are not relevent; even if alone they were not sufficient, they describe elements of human behaviour which were essential in drawing in the professional and “credentialed” classes into participating in the delusion.
I posted a few updates to this under the main article.
There are no pandemics, yet German journalist Paul Schreyer documents decades of rehearsals of pandemics.
https://youtu.be/d3WUv5SV5Hg
Honestly, there is no benign interpretation of this activity at all. Pretending there’s a pandemic is going to kill a lot of fragile people. This is well known.
We can rule out money as the primary motive because those who put it into effect must have had the authority of those who create money in central & private banks. Money has been a lubricant but war creates plenty of money. A pandemic is a messy method for accomplishing things they do much more efficiently by other means.
I claim that they must have had authorization because what happened shut down half the world and was very disruptive for the owners, not only for us peons.
Now we need another motive.
Even early on I ruled out gross control because they had that already.
This left control at the level of the individual as the only thing that made any sense.
Sure enough, there was early talk of digital ID, vaccine passports, cashless CBDC, not to mention The Great Reset. It’s not like they hid it.
And the pretended need for a response to the global climate boiling change nonsense is another course of action that leads inevitably to mass graves. Have you seen how nitrogenous fertiliser is made?
You might want to take into account that though I didn’t & still don’t predict numbers, because we don’t have sufficient information to do that, I did predict toxicity from the injections.
This started happening the first day of mass administration and never got better.
No one has even attempted a rebuttal of my detailed claims about the injections that have been public for almost four years. If I was wrong, a hundred scientists would have humiliated me in every format. If I was wrong, all the companies I’ve maligned would have sought & got injunctions against me. Neither have happened.
Instead, I’m censored like crazy and also smeared (less so nowadays than in the early years, I suspect because they’ve realised it’s best to draw no attention to me at all).
They’ve even messed with the search result algorithms in the main browsers. I’m flattered but offer this as yet more proof that I’m correct.
I’ve been formally certain this was intentional since Dec 1 2020, but I knew it in my bones much earlier than that. There’s no benign interpretation of what’s been done.
There’s no bloody pandemic either.
And it’s impossible anyway to make a complex medical product in under a year, literally impossible.
At this point I am incredulous that a well informed person comes up with any alternative explanation for the past five years that doesn’t involve totalitarian digital control and mass murder.